Transnational citizenship and the democratic state: Modes of membership and voting rights
Transnational citizenship and the democratic state: Modes of membership and voting rights
This article addresses two central topics in normative debates on transnational citizenship: the inclusion of resident non-citizens and of nonresident citizens within the demos. Through a critical review of the social membership (Carens, Rubio-Marin) and stakeholder (Baubock) principles, it identifies two problems within these debates. The first is the antinomy of incorporation, namely, the point that there are compelling arguments both for the mandatory naturalization of permanent residents and for making naturalization a voluntary process. The second is the arbitrary demos problem and concerns who determines whether expatriate voting rights are granted (and on what terms). The argument developed provides a way of dissolving the first problem (and defending the proposed solution against possible objections) and resolving the second problem. In doing so it provides a defensible normative basis for the political theory of transnational citizenship.
Democracy, Membership, Migration, Transnational citizenship, Voting rights
299-322
Owen, David
9fc71bca-07d1-44af-9248-1b9545265a58
15 May 2017
Owen, David
9fc71bca-07d1-44af-9248-1b9545265a58
Owen, David
(2017)
Transnational citizenship and the democratic state: Modes of membership and voting rights.
In,
Shaw, Jo and Štiks, Igor
(eds.)
Citizenship Rights.
Taylor & Francis, .
(doi:10.4324/9781315260211).
Record type:
Book Section
Abstract
This article addresses two central topics in normative debates on transnational citizenship: the inclusion of resident non-citizens and of nonresident citizens within the demos. Through a critical review of the social membership (Carens, Rubio-Marin) and stakeholder (Baubock) principles, it identifies two problems within these debates. The first is the antinomy of incorporation, namely, the point that there are compelling arguments both for the mandatory naturalization of permanent residents and for making naturalization a voluntary process. The second is the arbitrary demos problem and concerns who determines whether expatriate voting rights are granted (and on what terms). The argument developed provides a way of dissolving the first problem (and defending the proposed solution against possible objections) and resolving the second problem. In doing so it provides a defensible normative basis for the political theory of transnational citizenship.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 15 May 2017
Additional Information:
Publisher Copyright:
© 2013 Jo Shaw and Igor Štiks. All rights reserved.
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Democracy, Membership, Migration, Transnational citizenship, Voting rights
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 453765
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/453765
PURE UUID: 4d623b9e-da43-4fb0-ab34-b181cf74a4ec
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 24 Jan 2022 17:44
Last modified: 06 Jun 2024 01:35
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Editor:
Jo Shaw
Editor:
Igor Štiks
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics