ESM, Union Institutions and EU Treaties: A Symbiotic Relationship - Joint Cases C-8/15 P to C-10/15 P (Ledra Advertising Ltd et al) and Joint Cases C-105/15 P to C-109/15 P (Mallis and Malli et al)
ESM, Union Institutions and EU Treaties: A Symbiotic Relationship - Joint Cases C-8/15 P to C-10/15 P (Ledra Advertising Ltd et al) and Joint Cases C-105/15 P to C-109/15 P (Mallis and Malli et al)
On 20 September 2016 the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice delivered two landmark judgments pertaining to the bail-in measures that applied to two Cypriot banks (Bank of Cyprus and Popular (“Laiki”) Bank) in 2013. The judgments deal with three novel constitutional issues relating to judicial protection: First, the legal status of the Eurogroup, the reviewability of its output and the role of the Union institutions involved therein. Second, the EU Treaties’ limitations on the participation of Union institutions in the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) and the Union institutions’ liability when acting in that context. Finally, the permissible restrictions on the right to property under the EU Charter in the light of a bail-in. These rulings aim to reduce the legal uncertainty within the EMU’s governance. They are part of the litigation generated by the euro crisis which can be divided in two categories: First, the litigation pertaining to the normative and institutional developments in the EMU’s governance (see Pringle, Gauweiler); second, cases challenging the macroeconomic conditionality accompanying the financial assistance programmes to member states and respective austerity measures (e.g. ADEDY).
21-33
Xanthoulis, Napoleon
653ad673-f0ec-42e4-9fdf-0ea87d49779e
1 April 2017
Xanthoulis, Napoleon
653ad673-f0ec-42e4-9fdf-0ea87d49779e
Xanthoulis, Napoleon
(2017)
ESM, Union Institutions and EU Treaties: A Symbiotic Relationship - Joint Cases C-8/15 P to C-10/15 P (Ledra Advertising Ltd et al) and Joint Cases C-105/15 P to C-109/15 P (Mallis and Malli et al).
Revue Internationale des Services Financiers, 1, .
Abstract
On 20 September 2016 the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice delivered two landmark judgments pertaining to the bail-in measures that applied to two Cypriot banks (Bank of Cyprus and Popular (“Laiki”) Bank) in 2013. The judgments deal with three novel constitutional issues relating to judicial protection: First, the legal status of the Eurogroup, the reviewability of its output and the role of the Union institutions involved therein. Second, the EU Treaties’ limitations on the participation of Union institutions in the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) and the Union institutions’ liability when acting in that context. Finally, the permissible restrictions on the right to property under the EU Charter in the light of a bail-in. These rulings aim to reduce the legal uncertainty within the EMU’s governance. They are part of the litigation generated by the euro crisis which can be divided in two categories: First, the litigation pertaining to the normative and institutional developments in the EMU’s governance (see Pringle, Gauweiler); second, cases challenging the macroeconomic conditionality accompanying the financial assistance programmes to member states and respective austerity measures (e.g. ADEDY).
Text
HR&ILD-Xanthoulis
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: 1 April 2017
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 453772
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/453772
PURE UUID: 19378afd-d575-4ee7-a706-d2522a1ade0d
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 24 Jan 2022 17:45
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:08
Export record
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics
