The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Comparison of commercial DNA extraction kits for extraction of bacterial genomic DNA from whole-blood samples

Comparison of commercial DNA extraction kits for extraction of bacterial genomic DNA from whole-blood samples
Comparison of commercial DNA extraction kits for extraction of bacterial genomic DNA from whole-blood samples

The demand for molecular diagnostic tests in medical microbiology has highlighted the need for efficient methods of DNA extraction. In addition, it is preferable for these methods to be automated. An example of such a requirement is for the confirmation of meningococcal disease where rapid, sensitive, and specific procedures are required for public health management purposes. Previous studies have shown that whole blood is the preferred method for the isolation of bacterial DNA in meningococcal disease, and in this study, we compare five commercially available kits for the extraction of bacterial genomic DNA from whole-blood samples. These include kits in a 96-well binding plate, 96-well filter plate, and metallic bead formats. The method for all five kits is described, and the sensitivity, specificity, ease of automation, and overall efficiency are determined.

Blood/microbiology, DNA, Bacterial/isolation & purification, Genome, Bacterial, Haemophilus influenzae/genetics, Humans, Neisseria meningitidis/genetics, Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods, Reagent Kits, Diagnostic, Sensitivity and Specificity, Streptococcus pneumoniae/genetics
0095-1137
2440-3
Smith, K
a2e75daf-e60c-4548-a4f4-0b2394ffc04a
Diggle, M A
d739c25b-e038-4a9a-850d-2e2fd6ff4a4f
Clarke, S C
f7d7f7a2-4b1f-4b36-883a-0f967e73fb17
Smith, K
a2e75daf-e60c-4548-a4f4-0b2394ffc04a
Diggle, M A
d739c25b-e038-4a9a-850d-2e2fd6ff4a4f
Clarke, S C
f7d7f7a2-4b1f-4b36-883a-0f967e73fb17

Smith, K, Diggle, M A and Clarke, S C (2003) Comparison of commercial DNA extraction kits for extraction of bacterial genomic DNA from whole-blood samples. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 41 (6), 2440-3. (doi:10.1128/JCM.41.6.2440-2443.2003).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The demand for molecular diagnostic tests in medical microbiology has highlighted the need for efficient methods of DNA extraction. In addition, it is preferable for these methods to be automated. An example of such a requirement is for the confirmation of meningococcal disease where rapid, sensitive, and specific procedures are required for public health management purposes. Previous studies have shown that whole blood is the preferred method for the isolation of bacterial DNA in meningococcal disease, and in this study, we compare five commercially available kits for the extraction of bacterial genomic DNA from whole-blood samples. These include kits in a 96-well binding plate, 96-well filter plate, and metallic bead formats. The method for all five kits is described, and the sensitivity, specificity, ease of automation, and overall efficiency are determined.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: June 2003
Keywords: Blood/microbiology, DNA, Bacterial/isolation & purification, Genome, Bacterial, Haemophilus influenzae/genetics, Humans, Neisseria meningitidis/genetics, Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods, Reagent Kits, Diagnostic, Sensitivity and Specificity, Streptococcus pneumoniae/genetics

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 454157
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/454157
ISSN: 0095-1137
PURE UUID: 5eade7e9-7fcc-4d4d-b2de-5baaf77f2ed3
ORCID for S C Clarke: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7009-1548

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Feb 2022 17:43
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:07

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: K Smith
Author: M A Diggle
Author: S C Clarke ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×