The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Reducing uncertainty in ecosystem service modelling through weighted ensembles

Reducing uncertainty in ecosystem service modelling through weighted ensembles
Reducing uncertainty in ecosystem service modelling through weighted ensembles

Over the last decade many ecosystem service (ES) models have been developed to inform sustainable land and water use planning. However, uncertainty in the predictions of any single model in any specific situation can undermine their utility for decision-making. One solution is creating ensemble predictions, which potentially increase accuracy, but how best to create ES ensembles to reduce uncertainty is unknown and untested. Using ten models for carbon storage and nine for water supply, we tested a series of ensemble approaches against measured validation data in the UK. Ensembles had at minimum a 5–17% higher accuracy than a randomly selected individual model and, in general, ensembles weighted for among model consensus provided better predictions than unweighted ensembles. To support robust decision-making for sustainable development and reducing uncertainty around these decisions, our analysis suggests various ensemble methods should be applied depending on data quality, for example if validation data are available.

Accuracy, Carbon, Committee averaging, Prediction Error, United Kingdom, Validation, Water supply, Weighted averaging
2212-0416
Hooftman, Danny A.p.
715d0810-9c09-47d4-9d33-07202d110112
Bullock, James M.
1905d5ee-f9cd-4752-b0aa-5ae5662b35e9
Jones, Laurence
6dbea67f-e714-408e-87ce-cf2cfed1ebd8
Eigenbrod, Felix
43efc6ae-b129-45a2-8a34-e489b5f05827
Barredo, José I.
305ae3c4-f493-401b-ac43-cea8f514f0c3
Forrest, Matthew
42a0f79e-0a39-400a-bcfa-7bf88c6f26a1
Kindermann, Georg
fffbb6d1-9772-43f7-90fd-be26da88370b
Thomas, Amy
98b8e74c-7071-46e4-a7b5-cffbf516696d
Willcock, Simon
89d9767e-8076-4b21-be9d-a964f5cc85d7
Hooftman, Danny A.p.
715d0810-9c09-47d4-9d33-07202d110112
Bullock, James M.
1905d5ee-f9cd-4752-b0aa-5ae5662b35e9
Jones, Laurence
6dbea67f-e714-408e-87ce-cf2cfed1ebd8
Eigenbrod, Felix
43efc6ae-b129-45a2-8a34-e489b5f05827
Barredo, José I.
305ae3c4-f493-401b-ac43-cea8f514f0c3
Forrest, Matthew
42a0f79e-0a39-400a-bcfa-7bf88c6f26a1
Kindermann, Georg
fffbb6d1-9772-43f7-90fd-be26da88370b
Thomas, Amy
98b8e74c-7071-46e4-a7b5-cffbf516696d
Willcock, Simon
89d9767e-8076-4b21-be9d-a964f5cc85d7

Hooftman, Danny A.p., Bullock, James M., Jones, Laurence, Eigenbrod, Felix, Barredo, José I., Forrest, Matthew, Kindermann, Georg, Thomas, Amy and Willcock, Simon (2022) Reducing uncertainty in ecosystem service modelling through weighted ensembles. Ecosystem Services, 53, [101398]. (doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101398).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Over the last decade many ecosystem service (ES) models have been developed to inform sustainable land and water use planning. However, uncertainty in the predictions of any single model in any specific situation can undermine their utility for decision-making. One solution is creating ensemble predictions, which potentially increase accuracy, but how best to create ES ensembles to reduce uncertainty is unknown and untested. Using ten models for carbon storage and nine for water supply, we tested a series of ensemble approaches against measured validation data in the UK. Ensembles had at minimum a 5–17% higher accuracy than a randomly selected individual model and, in general, ensembles weighted for among model consensus provided better predictions than unweighted ensembles. To support robust decision-making for sustainable development and reducing uncertainty around these decisions, our analysis suggests various ensemble methods should be applied depending on data quality, for example if validation data are available.

Text
Reducing uncertainty in ecosystem service modelling through weighted ensembles - Accepted Manuscript
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 8 December 2021
e-pub ahead of print date: 22 December 2021
Published date: 1 February 2022
Keywords: Accuracy, Carbon, Committee averaging, Prediction Error, United Kingdom, Validation, Water supply, Weighted averaging

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 454407
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/454407
ISSN: 2212-0416
PURE UUID: 82cfd16e-02cb-4a17-8821-906884c48fb9
ORCID for Felix Eigenbrod: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8982-824X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Feb 2022 17:31
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 07:04

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Danny A.p. Hooftman
Author: James M. Bullock
Author: Laurence Jones
Author: Felix Eigenbrod ORCID iD
Author: José I. Barredo
Author: Matthew Forrest
Author: Georg Kindermann
Author: Amy Thomas
Author: Simon Willcock

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×