The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Best-BRA (Is subpectoral or prepectoral implant placement best in immediate breast reconstruction?): a protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial of subpectoral versus prepectoral immediate implant-based breast reconstruction in women following mastectomy

Best-BRA (Is subpectoral or prepectoral implant placement best in immediate breast reconstruction?): a protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial of subpectoral versus prepectoral immediate implant-based breast reconstruction in women following mastectomy
Best-BRA (Is subpectoral or prepectoral implant placement best in immediate breast reconstruction?): a protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial of subpectoral versus prepectoral immediate implant-based breast reconstruction in women following mastectomy

Background: implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is the most commonly performed reconstructive procedure following mastectomy. IBBR techniques are evolving rapidly, with mesh-assisted subpectoral reconstruction becoming the standard of care and more recently, prepectoral techniques being introduced. These muscle-sparing techniques may reduce postoperative pain, avoid implant animation and improve cosmetic outcomes and have been widely adopted into practice. Although small observational studies have failed to demonstrate any differences in the clinical or patient-reported outcomes of prepectoral or subpectoral reconstruction, high-quality comparative evidence of clinical or cost-effectiveness is lacking. A well-designed, adequately powered randomised controlled trial (RCT) is needed to compare the techniques, but breast reconstruction RCTs are challenging. We, therefore, aim to undertake an external pilot RCT (Best-BRA) with an embedded QuinteT Recruitment Intervention (QRI) to determine the feasibility of undertaking a trial comparing prepectoral and subpectoral techniques.

Methods and analysis: best-BRA is a pragmatic, two-arm, external pilot RCT with an embedded QRI and economic scoping for resource use. Women who require a mastectomy for either breast cancer or risk reduction, elect to have an IBBR and are considered suitable for both prepectoral and subpectoral reconstruction will be recruited and randomised 1:1 between the techniques.The QRI will be implemented in two phases: phase 1, in which sources of recruitment difficulties are rapidly investigated to inform the delivery in phase 2 of tailored interventions to optimise recruitment of patients.Primary outcomes will be (1) recruitment of patients, (2) adherence to trial allocation and (3) outcome completion rates. Outcomes will be reviewed at 12 months to determine the feasibility of a definitive trial.

Ethics and dissemination: the study has been approved by the National Health Service (NHS) Wales REC 6 (20/WA/0338). Findings will be presented at conferences and in peer-reviewed journals.

Trial registration number: ISRCTN10081873.

Breast Implantation, Breast Implants, Breast Neoplasms/surgery, Female, Humans, Mammaplasty, Mastectomy, Pilot Projects, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
2044-6055
e050886
Roberts, Kirsty
567bcf1c-c441-4e96-af39-c49ccab64e80
Mills, Nicola
d43e1677-c156-4fc6-a09c-6519798682cc
Metcalfe, Chris
516c7009-41ad-4913-b7cd-5f9dffe792b1
Lane, Athene
6683aef1-075d-471f-9c9f-b561a2a3902e
Clement, Clare
d7ce5b3a-6b2b-478c-a506-982fedeb96d4
Hollingworth, William
ce7c7d7e-aa17-4986-8d67-02e0cf6e1a29
Taylor, Jodi
875cc40a-d428-4a7d-9ee0-710051549a88
Holcombe, Chris
f9196a8b-3f04-49cf-aa7b-e0a3e02caa57
Skillman, Joanna
c256c949-2985-4228-adf3-3a49e6b5f89f
Fairhurst, Katherine
2e7ac11b-017b-4ee4-a777-90b9b1887cc4
Whisker, Lisa
027116b4-974a-45fa-bd29-5e92e610e155
Cutress, Ramsey
68ae4f86-e8cf-411f-a335-cdba51797406
Thrush, Steven
b2ac6055-b39f-4083-8db3-e0b7644a8c52
Fairbrother, Patricia
137b0bd8-d286-42f0-b41a-71a084976cb0
Potter, Shelley
77970724-8e7c-47cb-973c-d5a7c6bd783c
Roberts, Kirsty
567bcf1c-c441-4e96-af39-c49ccab64e80
Mills, Nicola
d43e1677-c156-4fc6-a09c-6519798682cc
Metcalfe, Chris
516c7009-41ad-4913-b7cd-5f9dffe792b1
Lane, Athene
6683aef1-075d-471f-9c9f-b561a2a3902e
Clement, Clare
d7ce5b3a-6b2b-478c-a506-982fedeb96d4
Hollingworth, William
ce7c7d7e-aa17-4986-8d67-02e0cf6e1a29
Taylor, Jodi
875cc40a-d428-4a7d-9ee0-710051549a88
Holcombe, Chris
f9196a8b-3f04-49cf-aa7b-e0a3e02caa57
Skillman, Joanna
c256c949-2985-4228-adf3-3a49e6b5f89f
Fairhurst, Katherine
2e7ac11b-017b-4ee4-a777-90b9b1887cc4
Whisker, Lisa
027116b4-974a-45fa-bd29-5e92e610e155
Cutress, Ramsey
68ae4f86-e8cf-411f-a335-cdba51797406
Thrush, Steven
b2ac6055-b39f-4083-8db3-e0b7644a8c52
Fairbrother, Patricia
137b0bd8-d286-42f0-b41a-71a084976cb0
Potter, Shelley
77970724-8e7c-47cb-973c-d5a7c6bd783c

Roberts, Kirsty, Mills, Nicola, Metcalfe, Chris, Lane, Athene, Clement, Clare, Hollingworth, William, Taylor, Jodi, Holcombe, Chris, Skillman, Joanna, Fairhurst, Katherine, Whisker, Lisa, Cutress, Ramsey, Thrush, Steven, Fairbrother, Patricia and Potter, Shelley (2021) Best-BRA (Is subpectoral or prepectoral implant placement best in immediate breast reconstruction?): a protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial of subpectoral versus prepectoral immediate implant-based breast reconstruction in women following mastectomy. BMJ Open, 11 (11), e050886. (doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050886).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is the most commonly performed reconstructive procedure following mastectomy. IBBR techniques are evolving rapidly, with mesh-assisted subpectoral reconstruction becoming the standard of care and more recently, prepectoral techniques being introduced. These muscle-sparing techniques may reduce postoperative pain, avoid implant animation and improve cosmetic outcomes and have been widely adopted into practice. Although small observational studies have failed to demonstrate any differences in the clinical or patient-reported outcomes of prepectoral or subpectoral reconstruction, high-quality comparative evidence of clinical or cost-effectiveness is lacking. A well-designed, adequately powered randomised controlled trial (RCT) is needed to compare the techniques, but breast reconstruction RCTs are challenging. We, therefore, aim to undertake an external pilot RCT (Best-BRA) with an embedded QuinteT Recruitment Intervention (QRI) to determine the feasibility of undertaking a trial comparing prepectoral and subpectoral techniques.

Methods and analysis: best-BRA is a pragmatic, two-arm, external pilot RCT with an embedded QRI and economic scoping for resource use. Women who require a mastectomy for either breast cancer or risk reduction, elect to have an IBBR and are considered suitable for both prepectoral and subpectoral reconstruction will be recruited and randomised 1:1 between the techniques.The QRI will be implemented in two phases: phase 1, in which sources of recruitment difficulties are rapidly investigated to inform the delivery in phase 2 of tailored interventions to optimise recruitment of patients.Primary outcomes will be (1) recruitment of patients, (2) adherence to trial allocation and (3) outcome completion rates. Outcomes will be reviewed at 12 months to determine the feasibility of a definitive trial.

Ethics and dissemination: the study has been approved by the National Health Service (NHS) Wales REC 6 (20/WA/0338). Findings will be presented at conferences and in peer-reviewed journals.

Trial registration number: ISRCTN10081873.

Text
e050886.full - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (617kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 1 November 2021
Published date: 30 November 2021
Additional Information: Acknowledgments This study is being undertaken with the support of the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol. This study was designed and delivered in collaboration with the Bristol Trials Centre (BTC), a UKCRC Registered Clinical Trials Unit in receipt of National Institute for Health Research CTU support funding. Trial steering and data monitoring committee members: Matthew Gardiner (chair), Dr Isabelle Smith (statistician) and Elizabeth Teasdale (PPI member).
Keywords: Breast Implantation, Breast Implants, Breast Neoplasms/surgery, Female, Humans, Mammaplasty, Mastectomy, Pilot Projects, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 454534
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/454534
ISSN: 2044-6055
PURE UUID: 1626a107-0170-48f0-b9ba-ec3b681e3579

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Feb 2022 17:40
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 15:46

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Kirsty Roberts
Author: Nicola Mills
Author: Chris Metcalfe
Author: Athene Lane
Author: Clare Clement
Author: William Hollingworth
Author: Jodi Taylor
Author: Chris Holcombe
Author: Joanna Skillman
Author: Katherine Fairhurst
Author: Lisa Whisker
Author: Ramsey Cutress
Author: Steven Thrush
Author: Patricia Fairbrother
Author: Shelley Potter

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×