Comparative analysis of different polymer materials for the construction of microbial fuel cell stacks
Comparative analysis of different polymer materials for the construction of microbial fuel cell stacks
Microbial Fuel Cells (MFCs) have potential use as a renewable energy source, notably in the recovery of electricity from wastewater, and reduction of energy needs for the treatment process. Recent studies have shown that electron abstraction is more efficient at the smaller scale and that scale up of electricity production (and concomitant breakdown of waste) is more likely to be achieved via stacking of several small MFCs rather than increasing the volume of single units. If these stacked systems are to be consolidated, an overall reduction in manufacturing costs must be achieved (no expensive materials/catalysts).
This study aims to compare 5 different commercially-available engineering plastics: PMMA (Poly methyl-methacrylate a.k.a. Perspex), PC (Polycarbonate), ABS and ABSplus (Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene) and RC25 Nanocure (ceramic-filled photocurable resin). MFC chambers were fabricated–with common techniques such as CNC (Computer Numerical Controlled) machining, FDM (Fused Deposition Modelling) and SL (Stereolithography)–to the same dimensions and evaluated under the same physicochemical conditions. The different constructs were assessed by long term (1 month) performance monitoring with a fixed load resistor and also by polarisation runs using a variable resistor box.
Microbial fuel cells, Polymeric materials, Polarisation
S143-S143
Ledezma, P.
bae34594-33d7-4dfe-98b7-e13ba49b4aac
Ieropoulos, I.
6c580270-3e08-430a-9f49-7fbe869daf13
Greenman, J.
eb3d9b82-7cac-4442-9301-f34884ae4a16
11 November 2010
Ledezma, P.
bae34594-33d7-4dfe-98b7-e13ba49b4aac
Ieropoulos, I.
6c580270-3e08-430a-9f49-7fbe869daf13
Greenman, J.
eb3d9b82-7cac-4442-9301-f34884ae4a16
Ledezma, P., Ieropoulos, I. and Greenman, J.
(2010)
Comparative analysis of different polymer materials for the construction of microbial fuel cell stacks.
Journal of Biotechnology, 150, .
(doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.08.373).
Record type:
Meeting abstract
Abstract
Microbial Fuel Cells (MFCs) have potential use as a renewable energy source, notably in the recovery of electricity from wastewater, and reduction of energy needs for the treatment process. Recent studies have shown that electron abstraction is more efficient at the smaller scale and that scale up of electricity production (and concomitant breakdown of waste) is more likely to be achieved via stacking of several small MFCs rather than increasing the volume of single units. If these stacked systems are to be consolidated, an overall reduction in manufacturing costs must be achieved (no expensive materials/catalysts).
This study aims to compare 5 different commercially-available engineering plastics: PMMA (Poly methyl-methacrylate a.k.a. Perspex), PC (Polycarbonate), ABS and ABSplus (Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene) and RC25 Nanocure (ceramic-filled photocurable resin). MFC chambers were fabricated–with common techniques such as CNC (Computer Numerical Controlled) machining, FDM (Fused Deposition Modelling) and SL (Stereolithography)–to the same dimensions and evaluated under the same physicochemical conditions. The different constructs were assessed by long term (1 month) performance monitoring with a fixed load resistor and also by polarisation runs using a variable resistor box.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 11 November 2010
Keywords:
Microbial fuel cells, Polymeric materials, Polarisation
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 454657
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/454657
ISSN: 0168-1656
PURE UUID: 1f7de0a9-32e9-4ae3-8230-8bd08e6e98a9
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 18 Feb 2022 17:34
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:10
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
P. Ledezma
Author:
J. Greenman
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics