The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Comparative analysis of different polymer materials for the construction of microbial fuel cell stacks

Comparative analysis of different polymer materials for the construction of microbial fuel cell stacks
Comparative analysis of different polymer materials for the construction of microbial fuel cell stacks
Microbial Fuel Cells (MFCs) have potential use as a renewable energy source, notably in the recovery of electricity from wastewater, and reduction of energy needs for the treatment process. Recent studies have shown that electron abstraction is more efficient at the smaller scale and that scale up of electricity production (and concomitant breakdown of waste) is more likely to be achieved via stacking of several small MFCs rather than increasing the volume of single units. If these stacked systems are to be consolidated, an overall reduction in manufacturing costs must be achieved (no expensive materials/catalysts).

This study aims to compare 5 different commercially-available engineering plastics: PMMA (Poly methyl-methacrylate a.k.a. Perspex), PC (Polycarbonate), ABS and ABSplus (Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene) and RC25 Nanocure (ceramic-filled photocurable resin). MFC chambers were fabricated–with common techniques such as CNC (Computer Numerical Controlled) machining, FDM (Fused Deposition Modelling) and SL (Stereolithography)–to the same dimensions and evaluated under the same physicochemical conditions. The different constructs were assessed by long term (1 month) performance monitoring with a fixed load resistor and also by polarisation runs using a variable resistor box.
Microbial fuel cells, Polymeric materials, Polarisation
0168-1656
S143-S143
Ledezma, P.
bae34594-33d7-4dfe-98b7-e13ba49b4aac
Ieropoulos, I.
6c580270-3e08-430a-9f49-7fbe869daf13
Greenman, J.
eb3d9b82-7cac-4442-9301-f34884ae4a16
Ledezma, P.
bae34594-33d7-4dfe-98b7-e13ba49b4aac
Ieropoulos, I.
6c580270-3e08-430a-9f49-7fbe869daf13
Greenman, J.
eb3d9b82-7cac-4442-9301-f34884ae4a16

Ledezma, P., Ieropoulos, I. and Greenman, J. (2010) Comparative analysis of different polymer materials for the construction of microbial fuel cell stacks. Journal of Biotechnology, 150, S143-S143. (doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.08.373).

Record type: Meeting abstract

Abstract

Microbial Fuel Cells (MFCs) have potential use as a renewable energy source, notably in the recovery of electricity from wastewater, and reduction of energy needs for the treatment process. Recent studies have shown that electron abstraction is more efficient at the smaller scale and that scale up of electricity production (and concomitant breakdown of waste) is more likely to be achieved via stacking of several small MFCs rather than increasing the volume of single units. If these stacked systems are to be consolidated, an overall reduction in manufacturing costs must be achieved (no expensive materials/catalysts).

This study aims to compare 5 different commercially-available engineering plastics: PMMA (Poly methyl-methacrylate a.k.a. Perspex), PC (Polycarbonate), ABS and ABSplus (Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene) and RC25 Nanocure (ceramic-filled photocurable resin). MFC chambers were fabricated–with common techniques such as CNC (Computer Numerical Controlled) machining, FDM (Fused Deposition Modelling) and SL (Stereolithography)–to the same dimensions and evaluated under the same physicochemical conditions. The different constructs were assessed by long term (1 month) performance monitoring with a fixed load resistor and also by polarisation runs using a variable resistor box.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 11 November 2010
Keywords: Microbial fuel cells, Polymeric materials, Polarisation

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 454657
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/454657
ISSN: 0168-1656
PURE UUID: 1f7de0a9-32e9-4ae3-8230-8bd08e6e98a9
ORCID for I. Ieropoulos: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9641-5504

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 18 Feb 2022 17:34
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:10

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: P. Ledezma
Author: I. Ieropoulos ORCID iD
Author: J. Greenman

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×