Comparative study of three types of microbial fuel cell
Comparative study of three types of microbial fuel cell
Three different generations (Gen-I, -II and -III) of microbial fuel cell (MFC), distinguished by their historical development and mechanisms of electron transfer, were compared. Gen-I utilised synthetic redox mediators combined with Escherichia coli. In contrast, the Gen-II exemplar utilised the natural mediating properties of sulphate/sulphide with the sulphate reducing species Desulfovibrio desulfuricans. Gen-III MFCs were based on the anodophillic species Geobacter sulfurreducens and required no soluble mediator. Each type of MFC was operated under similar environmental conditions. In terms of substrate to power conversion efficiency, Gen-II was most efficient (64.52%), followed by Gen-III (47.38%) and Gen-I (28.12%). When output was expressed as power/unit of cells, Gen-III was 28-fold higher by comparison (33.72 × 1015 e/μg cells). For comparative purposes, these results were produced using equal rather than optimal circuit loads. Under optimal loading conditions, Gen-III produced on average five-fold higher power than under equal load and the conversion efficiency was 95%. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first time that these three types of MFC have been experimentally compared under similar conditions. Gen-II and -III but not Gen-I may be used advantageously in wastewater treatment and power generation from organic matter.
microbial fuel cells, dye mediators, sulphide, anodophillic bacteria, redox potential
238-245
Ieropoulos, IA
6c580270-3e08-430a-9f49-7fbe869daf13
Greenman, J
eb3d9b82-7cac-4442-9301-f34884ae4a16
Melhuish, C
b810405f-9492-42d0-b8b7-8712ab11536c
Hart, J
e949a885-7b26-4544-9e15-32ba6f87e49a
1 July 2005
Ieropoulos, IA
6c580270-3e08-430a-9f49-7fbe869daf13
Greenman, J
eb3d9b82-7cac-4442-9301-f34884ae4a16
Melhuish, C
b810405f-9492-42d0-b8b7-8712ab11536c
Hart, J
e949a885-7b26-4544-9e15-32ba6f87e49a
Ieropoulos, IA, Greenman, J, Melhuish, C and Hart, J
(2005)
Comparative study of three types of microbial fuel cell.
Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 37 (2), .
(doi:10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.03.006).
Abstract
Three different generations (Gen-I, -II and -III) of microbial fuel cell (MFC), distinguished by their historical development and mechanisms of electron transfer, were compared. Gen-I utilised synthetic redox mediators combined with Escherichia coli. In contrast, the Gen-II exemplar utilised the natural mediating properties of sulphate/sulphide with the sulphate reducing species Desulfovibrio desulfuricans. Gen-III MFCs were based on the anodophillic species Geobacter sulfurreducens and required no soluble mediator. Each type of MFC was operated under similar environmental conditions. In terms of substrate to power conversion efficiency, Gen-II was most efficient (64.52%), followed by Gen-III (47.38%) and Gen-I (28.12%). When output was expressed as power/unit of cells, Gen-III was 28-fold higher by comparison (33.72 × 1015 e/μg cells). For comparative purposes, these results were produced using equal rather than optimal circuit loads. Under optimal loading conditions, Gen-III produced on average five-fold higher power than under equal load and the conversion efficiency was 95%. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first time that these three types of MFC have been experimentally compared under similar conditions. Gen-II and -III but not Gen-I may be used advantageously in wastewater treatment and power generation from organic matter.
Text
Article
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Published date: 1 July 2005
Keywords:
microbial fuel cells, dye mediators, sulphide, anodophillic bacteria, redox potential
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 454685
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/454685
ISSN: 0141-0229
PURE UUID: 291458a8-e647-4785-814f-9164b9cbde92
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 21 Feb 2022 17:34
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:10
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
J Greenman
Author:
C Melhuish
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics