The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The first United Kingdom’s national ecosystem assessment and beyond

The first United Kingdom’s national ecosystem assessment and beyond
The first United Kingdom’s national ecosystem assessment and beyond

INTRODUCTION As water and land resources become scarcer, further conflicting demands of different uses and users will arise (Vörösmarty et al. 2000). Sustainable management is required to secure water resources for future generations. Ecosystem services-based approaches aim to ensure that the values of a broad range of benefits to humanity that are provided by our natural environment are accounted for in policy making, in order to foster sustainable development (Chapter 2). National-level incorporation of sustainable development goals has propelled interest in large-scale assessments of ecosystem services which can help address complex problems of ecosystem change (Bateman et al. 2013). The central question of this chapter is whether large-scale ecosystem services-based approaches provide an opportunity for improving water management. The UK National Ecosystem Assessment (UK-NEA) was the first analysis of the societal benefits of the UK natural environment (UK-NEA 2011a). Moreover, it was one of the leading initiatives worldwide to assess ecosystem services at national level after the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005) produced a global assessment. The first phase of the UK-NEA provided a wealth of policy-relevant information, and we use it here as a case study. UK rivers, lakes, and ponds make up around 250 000 hectares (1.1%) of the UK total surface area. These surface waters, together with unseen groundwater systems, contribute significant ecosystem services and goods to human well-being in the UK. The quality of UK freshwaters has improved over the last 50 years following direct regulatory interventions in rural and agricultural practices and EU Directives, such as the Water Framework Directive (Watson 2012). These policies have led to a reduction of point and diffuse chemical pollution and improved ecological conditions. Nonetheless, pressures from agricultural, industrial, and domestic use on water resources remains high, both in terms of quality and quantity (Watson 2012). Agricultural practices and landscape modifications, such as use of fertilisers, habitat fragmentation, and degradation, reduce the ecosystem service provision and resulting human benefits.

73-81
Cambridge University Press
Schaafsma, Marije
937ac629-0fa2-4a11-bdf7-c3688405467d
Ferrini, Silvia
47165331-b907-4aa6-a606-fd3fb412ff76
Harwood, Amii R.
5317de45-eb4b-4134-80b8-3cf3932034f5
Bateman, Ian J.
32951f10-7d68-4ca7-9e1f-51eee0582464
Martin-Ortega, Julia
Ferrier, Robert C.
Gordon, Iain J.
Khan, Shahbaz
Schaafsma, Marije
937ac629-0fa2-4a11-bdf7-c3688405467d
Ferrini, Silvia
47165331-b907-4aa6-a606-fd3fb412ff76
Harwood, Amii R.
5317de45-eb4b-4134-80b8-3cf3932034f5
Bateman, Ian J.
32951f10-7d68-4ca7-9e1f-51eee0582464
Martin-Ortega, Julia
Ferrier, Robert C.
Gordon, Iain J.
Khan, Shahbaz

Schaafsma, Marije, Ferrini, Silvia, Harwood, Amii R. and Bateman, Ian J. (2015) The first United Kingdom’s national ecosystem assessment and beyond. In, Martin-Ortega, Julia, Ferrier, Robert C., Gordon, Iain J. and Khan, Shahbaz (eds.) Water Ecosystem Services: A Global Perspective. (International Hydrology Series) Cambridge. Cambridge University Press, pp. 73-81. (doi:10.1017/CBO9781316178904.010).

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

INTRODUCTION As water and land resources become scarcer, further conflicting demands of different uses and users will arise (Vörösmarty et al. 2000). Sustainable management is required to secure water resources for future generations. Ecosystem services-based approaches aim to ensure that the values of a broad range of benefits to humanity that are provided by our natural environment are accounted for in policy making, in order to foster sustainable development (Chapter 2). National-level incorporation of sustainable development goals has propelled interest in large-scale assessments of ecosystem services which can help address complex problems of ecosystem change (Bateman et al. 2013). The central question of this chapter is whether large-scale ecosystem services-based approaches provide an opportunity for improving water management. The UK National Ecosystem Assessment (UK-NEA) was the first analysis of the societal benefits of the UK natural environment (UK-NEA 2011a). Moreover, it was one of the leading initiatives worldwide to assess ecosystem services at national level after the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005) produced a global assessment. The first phase of the UK-NEA provided a wealth of policy-relevant information, and we use it here as a case study. UK rivers, lakes, and ponds make up around 250 000 hectares (1.1%) of the UK total surface area. These surface waters, together with unseen groundwater systems, contribute significant ecosystem services and goods to human well-being in the UK. The quality of UK freshwaters has improved over the last 50 years following direct regulatory interventions in rural and agricultural practices and EU Directives, such as the Water Framework Directive (Watson 2012). These policies have led to a reduction of point and diffuse chemical pollution and improved ecological conditions. Nonetheless, pressures from agricultural, industrial, and domestic use on water resources remains high, both in terms of quality and quantity (Watson 2012). Agricultural practices and landscape modifications, such as use of fertilisers, habitat fragmentation, and degradation, reduce the ecosystem service provision and resulting human benefits.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 January 2015

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 455299
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/455299
PURE UUID: 5d5717ec-5bbc-43f1-bb6d-5e6f29932cff
ORCID for Marije Schaafsma: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0878-069X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Mar 2022 18:04
Last modified: 06 Jun 2024 01:53

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Silvia Ferrini
Author: Amii R. Harwood
Author: Ian J. Bateman
Editor: Julia Martin-Ortega
Editor: Robert C. Ferrier
Editor: Iain J. Gordon
Editor: Shahbaz Khan

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×