The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Health and health-care utilization of the older population of Ireland: comparing the intellectual disability population and the general population

Health and health-care utilization of the older population of Ireland: comparing the intellectual disability population and the general population
Health and health-care utilization of the older population of Ireland: comparing the intellectual disability population and the general population
Background/Objectives: Largely unresearched are the similarities and differences compared to the general population in the aging of people with an intellectual disability (ID). Data reported here compare the health and health-care utilization of the general aging population in Ireland with those who are aging with ID.

Design: Data for comparisons were drawn from the 2010 The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA) and the Intellectual Disability Supplement (IDS)-TILDA Wave 1 data sets.

Setting: TILDA participants were community dwelling only while IDS-TILDA participants were drawn from community and institutional settings.

Participants: TILDA consists of a sample of 8,178 individuals aged 50 years and older who were representative of the Irish population. The IDS-TILDA consists of a random sample of 753 persons aged 40 and older. Using age 50 as the initial criterion, 478 persons with ID were matched with TILDA participants on age, sex, and geographic location to create the sample for this comparison.

Measurements: Both studies gathered self-reported data on physical and mental health, behavioral health, functional limitations, and health-care utilization.

Results: Rates of chronic disease appeared higher overall for people with ID as compared to the general population. There were also age-related differences in the prevalence of diabetes and cancer and different rates of engagement between the two groups in relevant behavioral health activities such as smoking. There were higher utilization levels among IDS-TILDA participants for allied health and general practitioner visits.

Conclusion: Different disease trajectories found among IDS-TILDA participants raise concerns. The longitudinal comparison of data for people with ID and for the general population offered a better opportunity for the unique experiences of people with ID to be included in data that inform health planning.
0164-0275
693-718
McCarron, Mary
f3d1c9d4-d90f-4583-ac43-334fb4a299c4
Cleary, Eimear
3cbf7016-269e-4517-ab4f-323e86db6e58
Mccallion, Philip
4160ad9d-ba8c-4e4d-bac7-4d80e14bb9ce
McCarron, Mary
f3d1c9d4-d90f-4583-ac43-334fb4a299c4
Cleary, Eimear
3cbf7016-269e-4517-ab4f-323e86db6e58
Mccallion, Philip
4160ad9d-ba8c-4e4d-bac7-4d80e14bb9ce

McCarron, Mary, Cleary, Eimear and Mccallion, Philip (2017) Health and health-care utilization of the older population of Ireland: comparing the intellectual disability population and the general population. Research on Aging, 39 (6), 693-718. (doi:10.1177/0164027516684172).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Largely unresearched are the similarities and differences compared to the general population in the aging of people with an intellectual disability (ID). Data reported here compare the health and health-care utilization of the general aging population in Ireland with those who are aging with ID.

Design: Data for comparisons were drawn from the 2010 The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA) and the Intellectual Disability Supplement (IDS)-TILDA Wave 1 data sets.

Setting: TILDA participants were community dwelling only while IDS-TILDA participants were drawn from community and institutional settings.

Participants: TILDA consists of a sample of 8,178 individuals aged 50 years and older who were representative of the Irish population. The IDS-TILDA consists of a random sample of 753 persons aged 40 and older. Using age 50 as the initial criterion, 478 persons with ID were matched with TILDA participants on age, sex, and geographic location to create the sample for this comparison.

Measurements: Both studies gathered self-reported data on physical and mental health, behavioral health, functional limitations, and health-care utilization.

Results: Rates of chronic disease appeared higher overall for people with ID as compared to the general population. There were also age-related differences in the prevalence of diabetes and cancer and different rates of engagement between the two groups in relevant behavioral health activities such as smoking. There were higher utilization levels among IDS-TILDA participants for allied health and general practitioner visits.

Conclusion: Different disease trajectories found among IDS-TILDA participants raise concerns. The longitudinal comparison of data for people with ID and for the general population offered a better opportunity for the unique experiences of people with ID to be included in data that inform health planning.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2017

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 455548
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/455548
ISSN: 0164-0275
PURE UUID: b5cc216e-d10d-4be4-a1e2-2e66998ade3a
ORCID for Eimear Cleary: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2549-8565

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 25 Mar 2022 17:35
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:07

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Mary McCarron
Author: Eimear Cleary ORCID iD
Author: Philip Mccallion

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×