The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The impact of limited prosthetic socket documentation: a researcher perspective

The impact of limited prosthetic socket documentation: a researcher perspective
The impact of limited prosthetic socket documentation: a researcher perspective
The majority of limb prostheses are socket mounted. For these devices, the socket is essential for adequate prosthetic suspension, comfort, and control. The socket is unique among prosthetic components as it is not usually mass-produced and must instead be custom-made for individual residual limbs by a prosthetist. The knowledge of what constitutes “good” socket fit is gained by expert prosthetists and technicians over years of experience, and rarely documented. The reliance on tacit knowledge makes it difficult to standardize the criteria for a well-fitting socket, leading to difficulties understanding the impact of socket fit. Despite its importance, the workflow for socket fitting is often overlooked in literature. Due to the customized nature of sockets, if information is provided in literature, generally only the type of socket and suspension mechanism is noted, with information regarding the fitting and manufacturing processes omitted. In this article, the concerns, issues and consequences arising from lack of upper and lower limb socket documentation are discussed from a researcher perspective, supported by healthcare professionals and socket fabrication specialists. Key changes are proposed to the way socket manufacturing and evaluation are documented to assist future research
853414
Olsen, Jenny
a7048c1b-ea57-44f4-a839-64fef808703a
Turner, Shruti
a40e35bf-823b-4e64-a9aa-9e1fc7c4139c
Chadwell, Alix
c337930e-a6b5-43e3-8ca5-eed1d2d71340
Dickinson, Alexander
10151972-c1b5-4f7d-bc12-6482b5870cad
Ostler, Chantel, Marie
c5e34ffb-7763-4fc0-98a4-128d1ed5d967
Armitage, Lucy
1c2ed788-73a2-4dff-9c04-4281e9616e91
McGregor, Alison
fccf158f-85b0-4333-98f2-55bec69c5d94
Dupan, Sigrid
69bddf68-7ea4-41d4-acb7-83d940c02f15
Day, Sarah
3af2930a-d2cc-436d-8ff6-a2415815f4ad
Olsen, Jenny
a7048c1b-ea57-44f4-a839-64fef808703a
Turner, Shruti
a40e35bf-823b-4e64-a9aa-9e1fc7c4139c
Chadwell, Alix
c337930e-a6b5-43e3-8ca5-eed1d2d71340
Dickinson, Alexander
10151972-c1b5-4f7d-bc12-6482b5870cad
Ostler, Chantel, Marie
c5e34ffb-7763-4fc0-98a4-128d1ed5d967
Armitage, Lucy
1c2ed788-73a2-4dff-9c04-4281e9616e91
McGregor, Alison
fccf158f-85b0-4333-98f2-55bec69c5d94
Dupan, Sigrid
69bddf68-7ea4-41d4-acb7-83d940c02f15
Day, Sarah
3af2930a-d2cc-436d-8ff6-a2415815f4ad

Olsen, Jenny, Turner, Shruti, Chadwell, Alix, Dickinson, Alexander, Ostler, Chantel, Marie, Armitage, Lucy, McGregor, Alison, Dupan, Sigrid and Day, Sarah (2022) The impact of limited prosthetic socket documentation: a researcher perspective. Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences, 3, 853414. (doi:10.3389/fresc.2022.853414).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The majority of limb prostheses are socket mounted. For these devices, the socket is essential for adequate prosthetic suspension, comfort, and control. The socket is unique among prosthetic components as it is not usually mass-produced and must instead be custom-made for individual residual limbs by a prosthetist. The knowledge of what constitutes “good” socket fit is gained by expert prosthetists and technicians over years of experience, and rarely documented. The reliance on tacit knowledge makes it difficult to standardize the criteria for a well-fitting socket, leading to difficulties understanding the impact of socket fit. Despite its importance, the workflow for socket fitting is often overlooked in literature. Due to the customized nature of sockets, if information is provided in literature, generally only the type of socket and suspension mechanism is noted, with information regarding the fitting and manufacturing processes omitted. In this article, the concerns, issues and consequences arising from lack of upper and lower limb socket documentation are discussed from a researcher perspective, supported by healthcare professionals and socket fabrication specialists. Key changes are proposed to the way socket manufacturing and evaluation are documented to assist future research

Text
fresc-03-853414 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (200kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 11 February 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 7 March 2022
Published date: 7 March 2022

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 455782
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/455782
PURE UUID: 9005ab6b-9cb1-42f2-b45d-dcd650c66548
ORCID for Alix Chadwell: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9101-5202
ORCID for Alexander Dickinson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9647-1944
ORCID for Chantel, Marie Ostler: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8267-2892

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Apr 2022 16:45
Last modified: 25 Sep 2024 01:57

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Jenny Olsen
Author: Shruti Turner
Author: Alix Chadwell ORCID iD
Author: Chantel, Marie Ostler ORCID iD
Author: Lucy Armitage
Author: Alison McGregor
Author: Sigrid Dupan
Author: Sarah Day

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×