Outcome following repeat liver resection for colorectal liver metastases
Outcome following repeat liver resection for colorectal liver metastases
AIM: Our aim was to determine independent predictors of survival after second liver resection and to confirm whether the type of first resection influences survival after repeat resection.
METHODS: Fifty-four patients who underwent a second liver resection for colorectal liver metastases were analyzed. To find independent predictors of survival, possible prognostic factors regarding the primary tumor, and the first and second resections were used in the Cox regression analysis.
RESULTS: There were three postoperative deaths within 90 days of surgery. The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 53% and 46%, respectively. The size of the tumor (>50mm) (p=0.005), serum carcinoembryonic antigen level (>30microg/L) (p=0.002), and the presence of a positive surgical margin at the second resection (p=0.006) were independent predictors of poor survival following the second resection. The type of first resection was not associated with survival but was associated with the ability to achieve a histological negative surgical margin at the second liver resection (p=0.01).
CONCLUSION: Three independent predictors of survival were identified. Major initial liver resection was associated with a reduced ability to achieve surgical clearance at the second resection. For colorectal liver metastases, major resection should only be performed if a negative margin cannot be achieved by minor resection.
Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use, Biomarkers, Tumor/blood, Carcinoembryonic Antigen/blood, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Colonic Neoplasms/pathology, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Forecasting, Hepatectomy/methods, Humans, Liver Neoplasms/pathology, Lung Neoplasms/secondary, Male, Middle Aged, Neoadjuvant Therapy, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology, Neoplasm, Residual/pathology, Prospective Studies, Rectal Neoplasms/pathology, Reoperation, Retrospective Studies, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome
729-34
Nishio, H
00db888d-ac01-4657-8c79-804b3d8ee813
Hamady, Z Z R
545a1c81-276e-4341-a420-aa10aa5d8ca8
Malik, H Z
07a4edfd-e6b7-4ef4-8120-6be46b04cb26
Fenwick, S
90d97842-85d8-4c4b-a4d3-9a1fcabc29dd
Rajendra Prasad, K
23cd5dae-9e8e-4348-9cc8-541b4f06ab43
Toogood, G J
f2183798-4d71-42fd-bcc9-483f191c066f
Lodge, J P A
c97dd104-0cb2-4f05-a008-9b9af01e4820
1 August 2007
Nishio, H
00db888d-ac01-4657-8c79-804b3d8ee813
Hamady, Z Z R
545a1c81-276e-4341-a420-aa10aa5d8ca8
Malik, H Z
07a4edfd-e6b7-4ef4-8120-6be46b04cb26
Fenwick, S
90d97842-85d8-4c4b-a4d3-9a1fcabc29dd
Rajendra Prasad, K
23cd5dae-9e8e-4348-9cc8-541b4f06ab43
Toogood, G J
f2183798-4d71-42fd-bcc9-483f191c066f
Lodge, J P A
c97dd104-0cb2-4f05-a008-9b9af01e4820
Nishio, H, Hamady, Z Z R, Malik, H Z, Fenwick, S, Rajendra Prasad, K, Toogood, G J and Lodge, J P A
(2007)
Outcome following repeat liver resection for colorectal liver metastases.
European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 33 (6), .
(doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2006.07.005).
Abstract
AIM: Our aim was to determine independent predictors of survival after second liver resection and to confirm whether the type of first resection influences survival after repeat resection.
METHODS: Fifty-four patients who underwent a second liver resection for colorectal liver metastases were analyzed. To find independent predictors of survival, possible prognostic factors regarding the primary tumor, and the first and second resections were used in the Cox regression analysis.
RESULTS: There were three postoperative deaths within 90 days of surgery. The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 53% and 46%, respectively. The size of the tumor (>50mm) (p=0.005), serum carcinoembryonic antigen level (>30microg/L) (p=0.002), and the presence of a positive surgical margin at the second resection (p=0.006) were independent predictors of poor survival following the second resection. The type of first resection was not associated with survival but was associated with the ability to achieve a histological negative surgical margin at the second liver resection (p=0.01).
CONCLUSION: Three independent predictors of survival were identified. Major initial liver resection was associated with a reduced ability to achieve surgical clearance at the second resection. For colorectal liver metastases, major resection should only be performed if a negative margin cannot be achieved by minor resection.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1 August 2007
Keywords:
Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use, Biomarkers, Tumor/blood, Carcinoembryonic Antigen/blood, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Colonic Neoplasms/pathology, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Forecasting, Hepatectomy/methods, Humans, Liver Neoplasms/pathology, Lung Neoplasms/secondary, Male, Middle Aged, Neoadjuvant Therapy, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology, Neoplasm, Residual/pathology, Prospective Studies, Rectal Neoplasms/pathology, Reoperation, Retrospective Studies, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 455815
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/455815
ISSN: 0748-7983
PURE UUID: 5aa695f9-9584-4626-bc80-241d7a844a6f
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 Apr 2022 17:33
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:12
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
H Nishio
Author:
Z Z R Hamady
Author:
H Z Malik
Author:
S Fenwick
Author:
K Rajendra Prasad
Author:
G J Toogood
Author:
J P A Lodge
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics