The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

RP or not RP: that is the co-creation question

RP or not RP: that is the co-creation question
RP or not RP: that is the co-creation question

The growth of rapid prototyping (RP) appears to show no sign of slowing. Within industry, recent advances in material development have driven the increased adoption of RP technologies for manufacture. Businesses and hobbyists have embraced the availability of low-cost, desktop 3D printers. Schools and universities have enthusiastically integrated 3D printing into their teaching, particularly within the fields of design and engineering. However, there is evidence that the popularity of RP is driving a disconnection between the worlds of industry and education. Recent comments by Apple’s head designer have highlighted a shortage in vital practical design skills among new graduates. These comments follow announcements of the closure of practical workshops within the design departments of several universities. Recent academic research has also been increasingly concerned about the educational benefits of utilising RP within design teaching. These developments raise a number of important questions for educators within design and engineering (D&E): Can the use of RP technology affect the development of other essential skills required in D&E? Is experience of RP technology an essential requirement for today’s D&E graduates? Is practical workshop experience an essential requirement for today’s D&E graduates? What view does the design industry take on these questions? Drawing on new research into the experiences of Bournemouth University’s BA/BSc Product Design students and industry professionals, this paper explores whether universities are providing students with the correct skills for today’s design industry; how RP affects the traditional design education approach; and whether the concept of co-creation through the combination of traditional physical fabrication and rapid prototyping is appropriate.
246-251
Institute of Engineering Designers; The Design Society
Koohgilani, Mehran
080d7229-10b5-4267-9513-d55bab6eace6
Powell, John
bdcceb91-0079-48fd-8646-0d8edc871e03
Underwood, Gary
cd267507-0634-44ca-90af-680fcd31b721
Koohgilani, Mehran
080d7229-10b5-4267-9513-d55bab6eace6
Powell, John
bdcceb91-0079-48fd-8646-0d8edc871e03
Underwood, Gary
cd267507-0634-44ca-90af-680fcd31b721

Koohgilani, Mehran, Powell, John and Underwood, Gary (2015) RP or not RP: that is the co-creation question. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, Loughborough University. Institute of Engineering Designers; The Design Society. pp. 246-251 .

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract


The growth of rapid prototyping (RP) appears to show no sign of slowing. Within industry, recent advances in material development have driven the increased adoption of RP technologies for manufacture. Businesses and hobbyists have embraced the availability of low-cost, desktop 3D printers. Schools and universities have enthusiastically integrated 3D printing into their teaching, particularly within the fields of design and engineering. However, there is evidence that the popularity of RP is driving a disconnection between the worlds of industry and education. Recent comments by Apple’s head designer have highlighted a shortage in vital practical design skills among new graduates. These comments follow announcements of the closure of practical workshops within the design departments of several universities. Recent academic research has also been increasingly concerned about the educational benefits of utilising RP within design teaching. These developments raise a number of important questions for educators within design and engineering (D&E): Can the use of RP technology affect the development of other essential skills required in D&E? Is experience of RP technology an essential requirement for today’s D&E graduates? Is practical workshop experience an essential requirement for today’s D&E graduates? What view does the design industry take on these questions? Drawing on new research into the experiences of Bournemouth University’s BA/BSc Product Design students and industry professionals, this paper explores whether universities are providing students with the correct skills for today’s design industry; how RP affects the traditional design education approach; and whether the concept of co-creation through the combination of traditional physical fabrication and rapid prototyping is appropriate.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 3 September 2015
Venue - Dates: DS 82: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE15): Great Expectations: Design Teaching, Research & Enterprise, Loughborough, Loughborough, United Kingdom, 2015-09-03 - 2015-09-04

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 455821
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/455821
PURE UUID: 509b2c4f-2537-4b01-8efd-ecf41a21c8eb

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Apr 2022 17:33
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 16:24

Export record

Contributors

Author: Mehran Koohgilani
Author: John Powell
Author: Gary Underwood

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×