The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Image guidance and improved accuracy of external ventricular drain tip position particularly in patients with small ventricles

Image guidance and improved accuracy of external ventricular drain tip position particularly in patients with small ventricles
Image guidance and improved accuracy of external ventricular drain tip position particularly in patients with small ventricles
Objective: external ventricular drain (EVD) insertion is one of the most common emergency neurosurgical procedures. EVDs are traditionally inserted freehand (FH) in an emergency setting, but often result in suboptimal positioning. Image-guided surgery (IGS) is selectively used to assist placement. However, the accuracy and practicality of IGS use is yet to be reported. In this study, the authors set out to assess if IGS is practical and improves the accuracy of EVD placement. Methods: case notes and images obtained in patients who underwent frontal EVD placement were retrospectively reviewed. Ventriculomegaly was determined by the measurement of the Evans index. EVD location was classified as optimal (ipsilateral frontal horn) or suboptimal (any other location). Propensity score matching of the two groups (IGS vs FH) for the Evans index was performed. Data were analyzed for patient age, diagnosis, number of EVDs, and complications. Those without postoperative CT scans were excluded. Results: a total of 607 patients with 760 EVDs placed were identified; 331 met inclusion criteria. Of these, 287 were inserted FH, and 44 were placed with IGS; 60.6% of all unmatched FH EVDs were optimal compared with 75% of the IGS group (p = 0.067). The IGS group had a significantly smaller Evans index (p < 0.0001). Propensity score matching demonstrated improved optimal position in the IGS group when compared with the matched FH group (75% vs 43.2%, OR 4.6 [1.5–14.6]; p = 0.002). Patients with an Evans index of ≥ 0.36 derived less benefit (75% in IGS vs 66% in FH, p = 0.5), and those with an Evans index < 0.36 derived more benefit (75% in IGS vs 53% in FH, p = 0.024). The overall EVD complication rate was 36% in the FH group versus 18% in the IGS group (p = 0.056). Revision rates were higher in the FH group (p = 0.035), and the operative times were similar (p = 0.69). Long intracranial EVD catheters were associated with tip malposition irrespective of the group. Conclusions: image guidance is practical and improves the accuracy of EVD placement in patients with small ventricles; thus, it should be considered for these patients.
0022-3085
Shtaya, A
7b9d3363-83f4-41a9-ae6d-3de05cabb937
Roach, J
8c5c387a-31ca-49ac-9886-9733a59ea902
Sadek, AR
745c319c-82b0-4eb4-b8ea-48ea7be1f2fa
Gaastra, B
c7b7f371-706b-4d59-9150-94e8f254e205
Hempenstall, J
dcad8e46-abee-46b0-98f5-bd8cd9de0b64
Bulters, D
d6f9644a-a32f-45d8-b5ed-be54486ec21d
Shtaya, A
7b9d3363-83f4-41a9-ae6d-3de05cabb937
Roach, J
8c5c387a-31ca-49ac-9886-9733a59ea902
Sadek, AR
745c319c-82b0-4eb4-b8ea-48ea7be1f2fa
Gaastra, B
c7b7f371-706b-4d59-9150-94e8f254e205
Hempenstall, J
dcad8e46-abee-46b0-98f5-bd8cd9de0b64
Bulters, D
d6f9644a-a32f-45d8-b5ed-be54486ec21d

Shtaya, A, Roach, J, Sadek, AR, Gaastra, B, Hempenstall, J and Bulters, D (2018) Image guidance and improved accuracy of external ventricular drain tip position particularly in patients with small ventricles. Journal of Neurosurgery, 130 (4). (doi:10.3171/2017.11.jns171892).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective: external ventricular drain (EVD) insertion is one of the most common emergency neurosurgical procedures. EVDs are traditionally inserted freehand (FH) in an emergency setting, but often result in suboptimal positioning. Image-guided surgery (IGS) is selectively used to assist placement. However, the accuracy and practicality of IGS use is yet to be reported. In this study, the authors set out to assess if IGS is practical and improves the accuracy of EVD placement. Methods: case notes and images obtained in patients who underwent frontal EVD placement were retrospectively reviewed. Ventriculomegaly was determined by the measurement of the Evans index. EVD location was classified as optimal (ipsilateral frontal horn) or suboptimal (any other location). Propensity score matching of the two groups (IGS vs FH) for the Evans index was performed. Data were analyzed for patient age, diagnosis, number of EVDs, and complications. Those without postoperative CT scans were excluded. Results: a total of 607 patients with 760 EVDs placed were identified; 331 met inclusion criteria. Of these, 287 were inserted FH, and 44 were placed with IGS; 60.6% of all unmatched FH EVDs were optimal compared with 75% of the IGS group (p = 0.067). The IGS group had a significantly smaller Evans index (p < 0.0001). Propensity score matching demonstrated improved optimal position in the IGS group when compared with the matched FH group (75% vs 43.2%, OR 4.6 [1.5–14.6]; p = 0.002). Patients with an Evans index of ≥ 0.36 derived less benefit (75% in IGS vs 66% in FH, p = 0.5), and those with an Evans index < 0.36 derived more benefit (75% in IGS vs 53% in FH, p = 0.024). The overall EVD complication rate was 36% in the FH group versus 18% in the IGS group (p = 0.056). Revision rates were higher in the FH group (p = 0.035), and the operative times were similar (p = 0.69). Long intracranial EVD catheters were associated with tip malposition irrespective of the group. Conclusions: image guidance is practical and improves the accuracy of EVD placement in patients with small ventricles; thus, it should be considered for these patients.

Text
[19330693 - Journal of Neurosurgery] Image guidance and improved accuracy of external ventricular drain tip position particularly in patients with small ventricles (3) - Version of Record
Available under License Other.
Download (2MB)

More information

Published date: 11 May 2018

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 455944
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/455944
ISSN: 0022-3085
PURE UUID: f1752075-3a53-4abc-a281-6236955ebae1
ORCID for B Gaastra: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7517-6882
ORCID for D Bulters: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9884-9050

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Apr 2022 16:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:07

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: A Shtaya
Author: J Roach
Author: AR Sadek
Author: B Gaastra ORCID iD
Author: J Hempenstall
Author: D Bulters ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×