The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The effect of a hydrolyzed protein diet on the fecal microbiota in cats with chronic enteropathy

The effect of a hydrolyzed protein diet on the fecal microbiota in cats with chronic enteropathy
The effect of a hydrolyzed protein diet on the fecal microbiota in cats with chronic enteropathy
The effect of a hydrolyzed protein diet on the fecal microbiota has not been studied in feline chronic enteropathy (CE). Our study aimed to (1) compare the fecal microbiota of cats with CE to control cats with no gastrointestinal signs and (2) determine the effect of a hydrolyzed protein diet on the fecal microbiota of cats with CE and whether this differs between dietary responders and non-responders. The fecal microbiome of cats with CE (n = 36) showed decreased α-diversity in terms of genus richness (P = 0.04) and increased β-diversity in terms of Bray-Curtis Dissimilarity (P < 0.001) compared to control cats (n = 14). Clostridium was the only genera significantly over-represented in cats with CE compared to control cats (adjusted P < 0.1). After 6-weeks of feeding the diet, fifteen cats were classified as responders and 18 as non-responders, based on clinical signs. At the genus level, α-diversity was increased in non-responders versus responders at diagnosis, but decreased after dietary intervention in both groups (P < 0.05). At the family level, non-responders became increasingly dissimilar after dietary intervention (P = 0.012). In general, the abundance of bacteria decreased with feeding a hydrolyzed diet, with the genera most significantly affected being more frequently observed in non-responders. Bifidobacterium was the only genus that increased significantly in abundance post-diet and this effect was observed in both responders and non-responders. Both Oscillibacter and Desulfovibrionaceae_unclassified were most abundant in non-responders at diagnosis but were rarely observed post diet in neither responders nor non-responders. Cats with CE had similar microbiota changes to those described in human inflammatory bowel disease. Whether the presence of Oscillibacter and Desulfovibrionaceae_unclassified are indicators of non-response to the diet at diagnosis requires further investigation. Despite the hydrolyzed diet reducing α-diversity in all cats with CE, this did not resolve gastrointestinal signs in some cats. However, responders metabolized the diet in a similar manner, reflected by sustained β-diversity, while the microbiome of non-responders became increasingly dissimilar compared to diagnosis at the family level. Therefore, the microbiome may not be as tightly regulated in cats with CE that are non-responders and therefore, these cats would require additional therapy for remission of clinical signs.
Animal Feed, Animals, Bacteria/classification, Cats, Feces/microbiology, Female, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/microbiology, Male, Protein Hydrolysates/pharmacology
2045-2322
Kathrani, Aarti
dc909987-b3d4-42cf-8270-59c77625942c
Yen, Sandi
c30f3c56-26a5-43eb-9fce-592583587558
Swann, Jonathan R
7c11a66b-f4b8-4dbf-aa17-ad8b0561b85c
Hall, Edward J
febbd74f-0b34-4eab-923d-08e6c8cfa44f
Kathrani, Aarti
dc909987-b3d4-42cf-8270-59c77625942c
Yen, Sandi
c30f3c56-26a5-43eb-9fce-592583587558
Swann, Jonathan R
7c11a66b-f4b8-4dbf-aa17-ad8b0561b85c
Hall, Edward J
febbd74f-0b34-4eab-923d-08e6c8cfa44f

Kathrani, Aarti, Yen, Sandi, Swann, Jonathan R and Hall, Edward J (2022) The effect of a hydrolyzed protein diet on the fecal microbiota in cats with chronic enteropathy. Scientific Reports, 12 (1), [2746]. (doi:10.1038/s41598-022-06576-y).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The effect of a hydrolyzed protein diet on the fecal microbiota has not been studied in feline chronic enteropathy (CE). Our study aimed to (1) compare the fecal microbiota of cats with CE to control cats with no gastrointestinal signs and (2) determine the effect of a hydrolyzed protein diet on the fecal microbiota of cats with CE and whether this differs between dietary responders and non-responders. The fecal microbiome of cats with CE (n = 36) showed decreased α-diversity in terms of genus richness (P = 0.04) and increased β-diversity in terms of Bray-Curtis Dissimilarity (P < 0.001) compared to control cats (n = 14). Clostridium was the only genera significantly over-represented in cats with CE compared to control cats (adjusted P < 0.1). After 6-weeks of feeding the diet, fifteen cats were classified as responders and 18 as non-responders, based on clinical signs. At the genus level, α-diversity was increased in non-responders versus responders at diagnosis, but decreased after dietary intervention in both groups (P < 0.05). At the family level, non-responders became increasingly dissimilar after dietary intervention (P = 0.012). In general, the abundance of bacteria decreased with feeding a hydrolyzed diet, with the genera most significantly affected being more frequently observed in non-responders. Bifidobacterium was the only genus that increased significantly in abundance post-diet and this effect was observed in both responders and non-responders. Both Oscillibacter and Desulfovibrionaceae_unclassified were most abundant in non-responders at diagnosis but were rarely observed post diet in neither responders nor non-responders. Cats with CE had similar microbiota changes to those described in human inflammatory bowel disease. Whether the presence of Oscillibacter and Desulfovibrionaceae_unclassified are indicators of non-response to the diet at diagnosis requires further investigation. Despite the hydrolyzed diet reducing α-diversity in all cats with CE, this did not resolve gastrointestinal signs in some cats. However, responders metabolized the diet in a similar manner, reflected by sustained β-diversity, while the microbiome of non-responders became increasingly dissimilar compared to diagnosis at the family level. Therefore, the microbiome may not be as tightly regulated in cats with CE that are non-responders and therefore, these cats would require additional therapy for remission of clinical signs.

Text
s41598-022-06576-y - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (2MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 2 February 2022
Published date: 17 February 2022
Additional Information: Funding Information: Grant from the American Academy of Veterinary Nutrition and Waltham. Publisher Copyright: © 2022, The Author(s). Copyright: Copyright 2022 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Keywords: Animal Feed, Animals, Bacteria/classification, Cats, Feces/microbiology, Female, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/microbiology, Male, Protein Hydrolysates/pharmacology

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 456059
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/456059
ISSN: 2045-2322
PURE UUID: 38d7f0b5-1d58-4b26-aa09-9b8ef261675d
ORCID for Jonathan R Swann: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6485-4529

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 25 Apr 2022 16:43
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:00

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Aarti Kathrani
Author: Sandi Yen
Author: Edward J Hall

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×