The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Accountability as mourning: accounting for death in the time of COVID-19

Accountability as mourning: accounting for death in the time of COVID-19
Accountability as mourning: accounting for death in the time of COVID-19
In view of the increasing coronavirus death toll around the globe, centralized governments have been put under the spotlight to account for the deaths in the sovereign states they represent. But could it be a problem if we simply hold governments accountable for deaths by demanding accurate and transparent accounting of the total? Is there a better way to account for deaths in a pandemic without ignoring the pathos of loss and undermining our capacity to act spontaneously? I engage with these questions by looking at how the ethics/politics of death, as two sides of the same coin, affect our understanding of accountability in the time of COVID-19. I distinguish between two types of accountability that correspond to the two meanings of “account for”: “to explain the reason or the cause of something” and “to form part of a total” (Cambridge Dictionary1). The second type of accountability, informed by a Deleuzian ethics of death, is explored through an interpretative case study of accounting for the deaths in Wuhan, where the global pandemic began. It shows that accountability is essentially a freedom-enabled endeavour to account for deaths through our repetition in mourning, which forms part of honouring the dead, the dying and the living. This new configuration implies that a more radical form of accounting is needed in order to appreciate the value of life and be mindful of the socio-psychological costs associated with deaths.
0361-3682
Yu, Ai
0c59d45f-7d68-4e4b-88a4-1333fe30a49d
Yu, Ai
0c59d45f-7d68-4e4b-88a4-1333fe30a49d

Yu, Ai (2021) Accountability as mourning: accounting for death in the time of COVID-19. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 90, [101198]. (doi:10.1016/j.aos.2020.101198).

Record type: Article

Abstract

In view of the increasing coronavirus death toll around the globe, centralized governments have been put under the spotlight to account for the deaths in the sovereign states they represent. But could it be a problem if we simply hold governments accountable for deaths by demanding accurate and transparent accounting of the total? Is there a better way to account for deaths in a pandemic without ignoring the pathos of loss and undermining our capacity to act spontaneously? I engage with these questions by looking at how the ethics/politics of death, as two sides of the same coin, affect our understanding of accountability in the time of COVID-19. I distinguish between two types of accountability that correspond to the two meanings of “account for”: “to explain the reason or the cause of something” and “to form part of a total” (Cambridge Dictionary1). The second type of accountability, informed by a Deleuzian ethics of death, is explored through an interpretative case study of accounting for the deaths in Wuhan, where the global pandemic began. It shows that accountability is essentially a freedom-enabled endeavour to account for deaths through our repetition in mourning, which forms part of honouring the dead, the dying and the living. This new configuration implies that a more radical form of accounting is needed in order to appreciate the value of life and be mindful of the socio-psychological costs associated with deaths.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 10 November 2020
Published date: 15 April 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 456139
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/456139
ISSN: 0361-3682
PURE UUID: 4a30e9de-7cb9-42bc-82ee-e69f8aebea94

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Apr 2022 15:02
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 16:33

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Ai Yu

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×