Systematic review of interventions to promote the performance of physical distancing behaviours during infectious disease pandemics/epidemics
Systematic review of interventions to promote the performance of physical distancing behaviours during infectious disease pandemics/epidemics
Objectives
Physical distancing, defined as keeping 1-2m apart when co-located, can prevent cases of droplet or aerosol transmitted infectious diseases such as SARS-CoV2. During the COVID-19 pandemic, distancing was a recommendation or a requirement in many countries. This systematic review aimed to determine which interventions and behavior change techniques (BCTs) are effective in promoting adherence to distancing and through which potential mechanisms of action (MOAs).
Methods
Six databases were searched. The review included studies that were (a) conducted on humans, (b) reported physical distancing interventions, (c) included any comparator (e.g., pre-intervention versus post-intervention; randomized controlled trial) and (d) reported actual distancing or predictors of distancing behavior. Risk of bias was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. BCTs and potential MoAs were identified in each intervention.
Results
Six papers indicated that distancing interventions could successfully change MoAs and behavior. Successful BCTs (MoAs) included feedback on behavior (e.g., motivation); information about health consequences, salience of health consequences (e.g., beliefs about consequences), demonstration (e.g., beliefs about capabilities) and restructuring the physical environment (e.g., environmental context and resources). The most promising interventions were proximity buzzers, directional systems and posters with loss-framed messages that demonstrated the behaviors.
Conclusions
The evidence indicates several BCTs and potential MoAs that should be targeted in interventions and highlights the gaps that should be focused on in future research.
KEYWORDS: Systematic review; physical distancing; COVID-19; social distancing
Highlights
•Evaluates the effectiveness of interventions to promote distancing in pandemics
•Six studies show that interventions can increase distancing
•Key techniques: feedback, information about consequences, restructuring
•Key delivery modes are posters and proximity buzzers
•Further research is required to test more techniques and modes of delivery
Epton, Tracy
c930c15c-4ecd-4d6a-a12a-3fb79d3e9080
Ghio, Daniela
3883f706-2f5b-4607-a4ab-4d911dff9e55
Ballard, Lisa
48a7b1af-4d2b-4ec7-8927-84361a3c62a9
Allen, Sarah F.
47477614-c2c6-491b-b7de-ac5a8b5c46e7
Kassianos, Angelos
140209c8-ffd8-4754-9bdd-bf588ae1cd43
Hewitt, Rachael
4344f40d-5267-4fd4-80ac-98571e6cd116
Swainston, Katherine
37c92e54-7907-4289-a519-acec8f7d5650
11 June 2021
Epton, Tracy
c930c15c-4ecd-4d6a-a12a-3fb79d3e9080
Ghio, Daniela
3883f706-2f5b-4607-a4ab-4d911dff9e55
Ballard, Lisa
48a7b1af-4d2b-4ec7-8927-84361a3c62a9
Allen, Sarah F.
47477614-c2c6-491b-b7de-ac5a8b5c46e7
Kassianos, Angelos
140209c8-ffd8-4754-9bdd-bf588ae1cd43
Hewitt, Rachael
4344f40d-5267-4fd4-80ac-98571e6cd116
Swainston, Katherine
37c92e54-7907-4289-a519-acec8f7d5650
Epton, Tracy, Ghio, Daniela, Ballard, Lisa, Allen, Sarah F., Kassianos, Angelos, Hewitt, Rachael and Swainston, Katherine
(2021)
Systematic review of interventions to promote the performance of physical distancing behaviours during infectious disease pandemics/epidemics.
PsyArXiv.
(doi:10.31234/osf.io/rn4vb).
Abstract
Objectives
Physical distancing, defined as keeping 1-2m apart when co-located, can prevent cases of droplet or aerosol transmitted infectious diseases such as SARS-CoV2. During the COVID-19 pandemic, distancing was a recommendation or a requirement in many countries. This systematic review aimed to determine which interventions and behavior change techniques (BCTs) are effective in promoting adherence to distancing and through which potential mechanisms of action (MOAs).
Methods
Six databases were searched. The review included studies that were (a) conducted on humans, (b) reported physical distancing interventions, (c) included any comparator (e.g., pre-intervention versus post-intervention; randomized controlled trial) and (d) reported actual distancing or predictors of distancing behavior. Risk of bias was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. BCTs and potential MoAs were identified in each intervention.
Results
Six papers indicated that distancing interventions could successfully change MoAs and behavior. Successful BCTs (MoAs) included feedback on behavior (e.g., motivation); information about health consequences, salience of health consequences (e.g., beliefs about consequences), demonstration (e.g., beliefs about capabilities) and restructuring the physical environment (e.g., environmental context and resources). The most promising interventions were proximity buzzers, directional systems and posters with loss-framed messages that demonstrated the behaviors.
Conclusions
The evidence indicates several BCTs and potential MoAs that should be targeted in interventions and highlights the gaps that should be focused on in future research.
KEYWORDS: Systematic review; physical distancing; COVID-19; social distancing
Highlights
•Evaluates the effectiveness of interventions to promote distancing in pandemics
•Six studies show that interventions can increase distancing
•Key techniques: feedback, information about consequences, restructuring
•Key delivery modes are posters and proximity buzzers
•Further research is required to test more techniques and modes of delivery
Text
Physical distancing review (full file)_
- Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Published date: 11 June 2021
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 456208
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/456208
PURE UUID: 022e2fde-bae2-4fd4-8bd2-54fb385bb71f
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 26 Apr 2022 17:04
Last modified: 06 Nov 2024 02:48
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Tracy Epton
Author:
Daniela Ghio
Author:
Sarah F. Allen
Author:
Angelos Kassianos
Author:
Rachael Hewitt
Author:
Katherine Swainston
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics