Evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of virtual group exercise for older adults delivered by trained volunteers: the ImPACt study protocol
Evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of virtual group exercise for older adults delivered by trained volunteers: the ImPACt study protocol
INTRODUCTION: Physical activity is important for healthy ageing. Despite strong evidence on the benefits of physical activity for health and well-being, physical inactivity remains a significant problem among older adults. This study aims to determine the feasibility and acceptability of implementing an online volunteer-led group exercise for older adults.
METHODS: A quasi-experimental mixed-methods approach will be used in this study. A training programme will be developed to train volunteers to deliver online group exercises to older adults aged >65 years (n=30). The primary outcome is the feasibility of implementing the intervention. This will be assessed by the number of volunteers recruited, trained, and retained at the end of the study, and the number of exercise sessions delivered and completed by participants. Secondary outcomes include physical activity levels measured using the Community Health Model Activities Programme for Seniors questionnaire, Barthel Index, EQ-5D-5L as a measure of health-related quality of life, SARC-F to determine sarcopenia status, and PRIMSA-7 to determine frailty status. Outcomes will be measured at baseline and at 6 months.Qualitative interviews will be conducted with volunteers(n=5), older adults (n=10) and family members (n=5) to explore their views on the intervention.
ANALYSIS: Simple descriptive statistics will be used to describe participant characteristics, the feasibility of the study and the impact of the intervention on health outcomes. Parametric(t-test) or non-parametric(Mann-Whitney U test) statistics will be used to analyse continuous variables. χ2 test will be used for categorical variables. Qualitative data will be analysed using an inductive thematic analysis approach.
ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study received ethical approval from the University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee and Research Integrity and Governance committee (ID: 52 967 .A1). Study findings will be made available to service users, voluntary organisations and other researchers who may be interested in implementing the intervention.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04672200.
geriatric medicine, qualitative research, rehabilitation medicine
Lim, Stephen Eu Ruen
dd2bfbd7-7f74-4365-b77e-9989f6408ddc
Meredith, Samantha
f123848c-d83f-40e7-bb7e-1c3b6c8e6ef0
Agnew, Samantha
22b794f4-5f46-4a40-a85f-82599db4362d
Clift, Esther
07818de6-82be-4830-a6cf-14f29cd19439
Ibrahim, Kinda
54f027ad-0599-4dd4-bdbf-b9307841a294
Roberts, Helen
5ea688b1-ef7a-4173-9da0-26290e18f253
1 February 2022
Lim, Stephen Eu Ruen
dd2bfbd7-7f74-4365-b77e-9989f6408ddc
Meredith, Samantha
f123848c-d83f-40e7-bb7e-1c3b6c8e6ef0
Agnew, Samantha
22b794f4-5f46-4a40-a85f-82599db4362d
Clift, Esther
07818de6-82be-4830-a6cf-14f29cd19439
Ibrahim, Kinda
54f027ad-0599-4dd4-bdbf-b9307841a294
Roberts, Helen
5ea688b1-ef7a-4173-9da0-26290e18f253
Lim, Stephen Eu Ruen, Meredith, Samantha, Agnew, Samantha, Clift, Esther, Ibrahim, Kinda and Roberts, Helen
(2022)
Evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of virtual group exercise for older adults delivered by trained volunteers: the ImPACt study protocol.
BMJ Open, 12 (2), [e052631].
(doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052631).
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Physical activity is important for healthy ageing. Despite strong evidence on the benefits of physical activity for health and well-being, physical inactivity remains a significant problem among older adults. This study aims to determine the feasibility and acceptability of implementing an online volunteer-led group exercise for older adults.
METHODS: A quasi-experimental mixed-methods approach will be used in this study. A training programme will be developed to train volunteers to deliver online group exercises to older adults aged >65 years (n=30). The primary outcome is the feasibility of implementing the intervention. This will be assessed by the number of volunteers recruited, trained, and retained at the end of the study, and the number of exercise sessions delivered and completed by participants. Secondary outcomes include physical activity levels measured using the Community Health Model Activities Programme for Seniors questionnaire, Barthel Index, EQ-5D-5L as a measure of health-related quality of life, SARC-F to determine sarcopenia status, and PRIMSA-7 to determine frailty status. Outcomes will be measured at baseline and at 6 months.Qualitative interviews will be conducted with volunteers(n=5), older adults (n=10) and family members (n=5) to explore their views on the intervention.
ANALYSIS: Simple descriptive statistics will be used to describe participant characteristics, the feasibility of the study and the impact of the intervention on health outcomes. Parametric(t-test) or non-parametric(Mann-Whitney U test) statistics will be used to analyse continuous variables. χ2 test will be used for categorical variables. Qualitative data will be analysed using an inductive thematic analysis approach.
ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study received ethical approval from the University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee and Research Integrity and Governance committee (ID: 52 967 .A1). Study findings will be made available to service users, voluntary organisations and other researchers who may be interested in implementing the intervention.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04672200.
Text
e052631.full
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 7 January 2022
Published date: 1 February 2022
Keywords:
geriatric medicine, qualitative research, rehabilitation medicine
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 456273
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/456273
ISSN: 2044-6055
PURE UUID: c0b83730-34ed-420f-a566-29562a92c732
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 27 Apr 2022 00:58
Last modified: 12 Jun 2024 02:02
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Samantha Meredith
Author:
Samantha Agnew
Author:
Esther Clift
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics