The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Screening, assessment and management of perioperative malnutrition: a survey of UK practice

Screening, assessment and management of perioperative malnutrition: a survey of UK practice
Screening, assessment and management of perioperative malnutrition: a survey of UK practice
Background: perioperative malnutrition is common and is associated with increased mortality, complications and healthcare costs. Patients having surgery for cancer and gastro-intestinal disease are at particular risk. It is a modifiable pre-operative risk factor and perioperative clinicians are well placed to identify those at risk and instigate interventions shown to improve outcome. Thus, we conducted a survey of Perioperative Medicine Leads with the aim of assessing the current provision of nutritional screening and intervention pathways in the UK.

Methods: Perioperative Medicine Leads registered with the Royal College of Anaesthetists were asked to complete an online survey exploring current practice in screening, assessment and management of malnutrition in the perioperative period. The survey included a mixture of open and closed questions, graded response questions and options for free text. Where a response was not received, departments were phoned directly and e-mails sent to non-responders.

Results: we received 121 completed questionnaires from 167 Perioperative Medicine Leads (response rate of 72.5%). Seventy respondents (57.9%) reported using the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool to screen patients; however, only 61 (50.4%) referred patients at nutritional risk onto a dietitian. Sixty (49.6%) lacked confidence in local ability to identify and manage malnutrition perioperatively, with 28 (23.1%) reporting having a structured pathway for managing malnourished patients. One hundred eleven respondents (91.7%) agreed that malnutrition impacts on quality of life after surgery and 105 (86.8%) felt adopting a standard protocol would improve outcomes for patients. Those reporting a lack of confidence in dealing with malnutrition perioperatively cited a lack of organisational support, patients being seen too close to surgery and lack of clarity around responsibility as key reasons for difficulties in managing this group of patients.

Conclusions: malnutrition in the perioperative period is a modifiable risk factor which is common and results in increased morbidity for patients and increased cost to healthcare systems. This survey highlights areas of practice where perioperative clinicians can improve the assessment and management of patients at nutritional risk prior to elective surgery.
2047-0525
Matthews, Lewis
81327a4c-b2a8-44f9-b5b2-fc04f856a930
Wootton, Stephen
bf47ef35-0b33-4edb-a2b0-ceda5c475c0c
Davies, S.J.
6321bcb6-1e91-4d59-9101-46a59da2d9c0
Levett, Denny
1743763a-2853-4baf-affe-6152fde8d05f
Matthews, Lewis
81327a4c-b2a8-44f9-b5b2-fc04f856a930
Wootton, Stephen
bf47ef35-0b33-4edb-a2b0-ceda5c475c0c
Davies, S.J.
6321bcb6-1e91-4d59-9101-46a59da2d9c0
Levett, Denny
1743763a-2853-4baf-affe-6152fde8d05f

Matthews, Lewis, Wootton, Stephen, Davies, S.J. and Levett, Denny (2021) Screening, assessment and management of perioperative malnutrition: a survey of UK practice. Perioperative Medicine, 10, [30]. (doi:10.1186/s13741-021-00196-2).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: perioperative malnutrition is common and is associated with increased mortality, complications and healthcare costs. Patients having surgery for cancer and gastro-intestinal disease are at particular risk. It is a modifiable pre-operative risk factor and perioperative clinicians are well placed to identify those at risk and instigate interventions shown to improve outcome. Thus, we conducted a survey of Perioperative Medicine Leads with the aim of assessing the current provision of nutritional screening and intervention pathways in the UK.

Methods: Perioperative Medicine Leads registered with the Royal College of Anaesthetists were asked to complete an online survey exploring current practice in screening, assessment and management of malnutrition in the perioperative period. The survey included a mixture of open and closed questions, graded response questions and options for free text. Where a response was not received, departments were phoned directly and e-mails sent to non-responders.

Results: we received 121 completed questionnaires from 167 Perioperative Medicine Leads (response rate of 72.5%). Seventy respondents (57.9%) reported using the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool to screen patients; however, only 61 (50.4%) referred patients at nutritional risk onto a dietitian. Sixty (49.6%) lacked confidence in local ability to identify and manage malnutrition perioperatively, with 28 (23.1%) reporting having a structured pathway for managing malnourished patients. One hundred eleven respondents (91.7%) agreed that malnutrition impacts on quality of life after surgery and 105 (86.8%) felt adopting a standard protocol would improve outcomes for patients. Those reporting a lack of confidence in dealing with malnutrition perioperatively cited a lack of organisational support, patients being seen too close to surgery and lack of clarity around responsibility as key reasons for difficulties in managing this group of patients.

Conclusions: malnutrition in the perioperative period is a modifiable risk factor which is common and results in increased morbidity for patients and increased cost to healthcare systems. This survey highlights areas of practice where perioperative clinicians can improve the assessment and management of patients at nutritional risk prior to elective surgery.

Text
s13741-021-00196-2 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (736kB)

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 26 August 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 456381
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/456381
ISSN: 2047-0525
PURE UUID: c5bc733a-9ad4-45f1-bc8b-48343b0a0f9c

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 27 Apr 2022 15:29
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 16:40

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Lewis Matthews
Author: Stephen Wootton
Author: S.J. Davies
Author: Denny Levett

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×