Impacted fetal head during second stage Caesarean birth: a prospective observational study
Impacted fetal head during second stage Caesarean birth: a prospective observational study
Objective: to determine the incidence of, and complication rates from, impacted fetal head at full dilatation Caesarean birth in the UK, and record what techniques were used.
Design: prospective observational study using the UK Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS).
Setting: 159 (82%) of the 194 UK hospitals with obstetric units.
Population: all women who underwent second stage Caesarean birth in the UK between 1st March and 31st August 2019. Further information was collected on cases where a dis-impaction technique was used, or the operating surgeon experienced 'difficulty' in delivering the head.
Methods: prospective observational study.
Main outcome measures: technique(s) used, maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Results: 3,518 s stage Caesarean births reported. The surgeon used a dis-impaction technique or reported 'difficulty' in 564 (16%) of these. The most common dis-impaction techniques used were manual elevation of the head by an assistant through the vagina (n = 235) and a fetal "pillow" (n = 176). Thirteen babies (2%) died or sustained severe injury. Four babies died (two directly attributable to the impacted fetal head).
Conclusions: difficulty with delivery of the fetal head and the use of dis-impaction techniques during second stage Caesarean sections are common but there is no consensus as to the best method to achieve delivery and in what order.
Birth injury, Birth trauma, Caesarean, Impacted fetal head, Instrumental delivery, Stillbirth
77-81
Wyn Jones, Nia
c2b842eb-fd1a-4479-8372-52c1ae74ee56
Mitchell, Eleanor J.
f7d8ce2d-e847-44c7-95af-4076be358af8
Wakefield, Natalie
da1a6392-be93-4c43-9761-b7776f9bb1cf
Knight, Marian
85aa1323-352b-431c-8fd2-e4902f6e8dc0
Dorling, Jon
e55dcb9a-a798-41a1-8753-9e9ff8aab630
Thornton, Jim G.
ac3af3ba-9b2e-4291-98d5-3618a853123f
Walker, Kate F.
6a8fc99a-eaed-4580-95af-bd8bc2f9f440
May 2022
Wyn Jones, Nia
c2b842eb-fd1a-4479-8372-52c1ae74ee56
Mitchell, Eleanor J.
f7d8ce2d-e847-44c7-95af-4076be358af8
Wakefield, Natalie
da1a6392-be93-4c43-9761-b7776f9bb1cf
Knight, Marian
85aa1323-352b-431c-8fd2-e4902f6e8dc0
Dorling, Jon
e55dcb9a-a798-41a1-8753-9e9ff8aab630
Thornton, Jim G.
ac3af3ba-9b2e-4291-98d5-3618a853123f
Walker, Kate F.
6a8fc99a-eaed-4580-95af-bd8bc2f9f440
Wyn Jones, Nia, Mitchell, Eleanor J., Wakefield, Natalie, Knight, Marian, Dorling, Jon, Thornton, Jim G. and Walker, Kate F.
(2022)
Impacted fetal head during second stage Caesarean birth: a prospective observational study.
European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 272, .
(doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.03.004).
Abstract
Objective: to determine the incidence of, and complication rates from, impacted fetal head at full dilatation Caesarean birth in the UK, and record what techniques were used.
Design: prospective observational study using the UK Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS).
Setting: 159 (82%) of the 194 UK hospitals with obstetric units.
Population: all women who underwent second stage Caesarean birth in the UK between 1st March and 31st August 2019. Further information was collected on cases where a dis-impaction technique was used, or the operating surgeon experienced 'difficulty' in delivering the head.
Methods: prospective observational study.
Main outcome measures: technique(s) used, maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Results: 3,518 s stage Caesarean births reported. The surgeon used a dis-impaction technique or reported 'difficulty' in 564 (16%) of these. The most common dis-impaction techniques used were manual elevation of the head by an assistant through the vagina (n = 235) and a fetal "pillow" (n = 176). Thirteen babies (2%) died or sustained severe injury. Four babies died (two directly attributable to the impacted fetal head).
Conclusions: difficulty with delivery of the fetal head and the use of dis-impaction techniques during second stage Caesarean sections are common but there is no consensus as to the best method to achieve delivery and in what order.
Text
1-s2.0-S0301211522002366-main
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 1 March 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 4 March 2022
Published date: May 2022
Additional Information:
Funding Information:
This project is funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (project reference 17/75/09). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. The funding body approved the final design of the study. The funding body had no involvement in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.
Funding Information:
The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: All authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare: NIHR HTA grant funding to support the submitted work, JD declares grants from NIHR, during the conduct of the study; grants from NIHR, from CIHR, from IWK, grants from Nova Scotia Research, outside the submitted work. All authors declare no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years, no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors
Keywords:
Birth injury, Birth trauma, Caesarean, Impacted fetal head, Instrumental delivery, Stillbirth
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 456576
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/456576
ISSN: 0301-2115
PURE UUID: b0c7aa59-fbf5-4286-bd26-e76903920f60
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 May 2022 16:38
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:23
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Nia Wyn Jones
Author:
Eleanor J. Mitchell
Author:
Natalie Wakefield
Author:
Marian Knight
Author:
Jon Dorling
Author:
Jim G. Thornton
Author:
Kate F. Walker
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics