The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Incremental or paradigm-shifting? Evidence about the retrenchment of public pension schemes in the industrialised world from expenditure and replacement rate data, 1980-2015

Incremental or paradigm-shifting? Evidence about the retrenchment of public pension schemes in the industrialised world from expenditure and replacement rate data, 1980-2015
Incremental or paradigm-shifting? Evidence about the retrenchment of public pension schemes in the industrialised world from expenditure and replacement rate data, 1980-2015
Pension systems have often been regarded as difficult to retrench, particularly in the larger conservative and social democratic welfare states. Empirical testing has generated significant doubts about such expectations. Using institutional analysis, most commentators accept significant reforms have occurred, often inconsistent with regime theory. Some regard the scale of the change in the conservative, Bismarckian world as paradigmatic. This chapter focuses on outcomes in 18 OECD countries using pension expenditure, adjusted for the size of older populations, and social rights data. Such data has been avoided due to the long-term nature of pension entitlement, but as we move further away from major reforms these concerns becomes less constraining. Based on this data, the chapter argues reforms from the 1980s to the early 2000s have generally resulted in retrenchment of outcomes which can be considered incremental at most. Support for pensioners has remained strong in most countries, both in terms of the public pension resource allocation and benefit generosity, although the strength of this commitment has diminished somewhat in more recent decades. This is true for all worlds of welfare. The only two major exceptions are Germany and Sweden.
244 - 264
Edward Elgar Publishing
Bridgen, Paul
6a2060f6-cbab-47d4-a831-ff82350055c9
Greve, Bent
Bridgen, Paul
6a2060f6-cbab-47d4-a831-ff82350055c9
Greve, Bent

Bridgen, Paul (2021) Incremental or paradigm-shifting? Evidence about the retrenchment of public pension schemes in the industrialised world from expenditure and replacement rate data, 1980-2015. In, Greve, Bent (ed.) Handbook on Austerity, Populism and the Welfare State. Cheltenham. Edward Elgar Publishing, 244 - 264. (doi:10.4337/9781789906745).

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

Pension systems have often been regarded as difficult to retrench, particularly in the larger conservative and social democratic welfare states. Empirical testing has generated significant doubts about such expectations. Using institutional analysis, most commentators accept significant reforms have occurred, often inconsistent with regime theory. Some regard the scale of the change in the conservative, Bismarckian world as paradigmatic. This chapter focuses on outcomes in 18 OECD countries using pension expenditure, adjusted for the size of older populations, and social rights data. Such data has been avoided due to the long-term nature of pension entitlement, but as we move further away from major reforms these concerns becomes less constraining. Based on this data, the chapter argues reforms from the 1980s to the early 2000s have generally resulted in retrenchment of outcomes which can be considered incremental at most. Support for pensioners has remained strong in most countries, both in terms of the public pension resource allocation and benefit generosity, although the strength of this commitment has diminished somewhat in more recent decades. This is true for all worlds of welfare. The only two major exceptions are Germany and Sweden.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 11 May 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 456781
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/456781
PURE UUID: 548b0198-59f7-4be3-a261-5dc5bf14b182
ORCID for Paul Bridgen: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6039-3254

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 May 2022 16:42
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:48

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Paul Bridgen ORCID iD
Editor: Bent Greve

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×