Forecasting realised volatility: does the LASSO approach outperform HAR?
Forecasting realised volatility: does the LASSO approach outperform HAR?
The HAR model dominates current volatility forecasting. This model implies a restricted lag approach, with three parameters accounting for an AR(22) structure. This paper uses the Lasso method, which selects a parsimonious lag structure, while allowing both a flexible lag structure and lags greater than 22. In-sample results suggest that while significance is largely found among the first 22 lags, consistent with the HAR model, there is evidence that longer lags contain information, as Lasso models provide an improved fit. Out-of-sample forecasts for daily, weekly and monthly volatility, evaluated using MSE, QLIKE, MCS and VaR measures, suggest that the ordered Lasso model provides the preferred forecasts using an AR(1 0 0) at the daily level and an AR(22) for the weekly and monthly horizons. The results support t
Ding, Yi
c2398405-127c-4dfc-a0d8-e4025d736610
Kambouroudis, Dimos
a1263623-1c79-48a4-b837-893bd31e6275
McMillan, David
fc95292e-bf0c-48b1-8fb9-85ee39a46d0d
22 September 2021
Ding, Yi
c2398405-127c-4dfc-a0d8-e4025d736610
Kambouroudis, Dimos
a1263623-1c79-48a4-b837-893bd31e6275
McMillan, David
fc95292e-bf0c-48b1-8fb9-85ee39a46d0d
Ding, Yi, Kambouroudis, Dimos and McMillan, David
(2021)
Forecasting realised volatility: does the LASSO approach outperform HAR?
Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 74.
(doi:10.1016/j.intfin.2021.101386).
Abstract
The HAR model dominates current volatility forecasting. This model implies a restricted lag approach, with three parameters accounting for an AR(22) structure. This paper uses the Lasso method, which selects a parsimonious lag structure, while allowing both a flexible lag structure and lags greater than 22. In-sample results suggest that while significance is largely found among the first 22 lags, consistent with the HAR model, there is evidence that longer lags contain information, as Lasso models provide an improved fit. Out-of-sample forecasts for daily, weekly and monthly volatility, evaluated using MSE, QLIKE, MCS and VaR measures, suggest that the ordered Lasso model provides the preferred forecasts using an AR(1 0 0) at the daily level and an AR(22) for the weekly and monthly horizons. The results support t
Text
SSRN-id3802466
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 11 July 2021
e-pub ahead of print date: 16 July 2021
Published date: 22 September 2021
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 456823
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/456823
ISSN: 1042-4431
PURE UUID: 0efecc1e-1eb6-4eb5-8df3-6c4983ffb155
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 12 May 2022 16:37
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 07:15
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Yi Ding
Author:
Dimos Kambouroudis
Author:
David McMillan
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics