The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

P06.03 Child, parent, and clinician selection of patient-reported outcome measures to use in pediatric neuro-oncology outpatient follow-up clinics

P06.03 Child, parent, and clinician selection of patient-reported outcome measures to use in pediatric neuro-oncology outpatient follow-up clinics
P06.03 Child, parent, and clinician selection of patient-reported outcome measures to use in pediatric neuro-oncology outpatient follow-up clinics
BACKGROUND
Survivors of childhood brain tumours are at risk of poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Appropriate and relevant measures can be used to monitor HRQoL so that timely interventions may be made for issues thus identified. We had previously selected patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) with good psychometric properties that had emerged as well-suited for this use in two systematic reviews. The aim of the present study was to ascertain the views of families regarding the suitability of the selected measures for use in paediatric neuro-oncology follow-up clinics. These views were then used to inform the choice of PROMs for use on the KLIK PROM portal, a website designed to gather HRQoL information from families.

MATERIAL AND METHODS
As part of the PROMOTE study, we used a multi-centre, multi-informant, cross-sectional, qualitative methods research design. Using ‘think aloud’ audio-recorded interviews, children aged 8–17 years diagnosed within the previous five years with a brain tumour, off treatment and receiving outpatient care, and their parents, were shown a total of nine PROMs and asked to express their views on which they preferred. Detailed notes were made of all audio-recordings by two independent researchers. The final choice of PROMs to be included on the KLIK PROM portal was agreed through discussion of the PROMs selected by families with an expert panel of clinicians, researchers, and parent representatives.

RESULTS
16 children and 17 parents participated and of these 2 children and 2 parents did not express a preference. The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Core module was the most popular among the children and parents with 7/14 (50%) of children selecting it as either their 1st or 2nd choice citing that they liked the questions and felt them to be most relevant to them, and 8/15 (53%) of parents citing that it was easy, quick and simple, the wording was easy, and they liked the questions about emotional, social, and school functioning. The least popular questionnaires, with no participants selecting them as first choices, were the Kidscreen-10 and the Health Utilities Index. The latter 2 were selected only as 2nd or lower choices by 1 child and 3 parents respectively.

CONCLUSION
The PROMs that were finally selected for the KLIK PROM portal were the parent- and child-report PedsQL-Core measures of HRQoL due to their good psychometric properties, family and clinician preference and perceived relevance to follow-up care, and for clinical utility on the KLIK PROM portal.
1522-8517
ii24-ii24
Bull, Kim
751f8b25-29ba-4d4f-96e2-6c339a83a47f
Stubley, Shelly
c0f620a1-5888-4481-85a8-b7f11a483c12
Freeman, Anita
ebc69b0b-4721-4d04-b54f-ee9e9d3ca004
Liossi, Christina
fd401ad6-581a-4a31-a60b-f8671ffd3558
Darlington, Anne-Sophie
472fcfc9-160b-4344-8113-8dd8760ff962
Grootenhuis, Martha A.
a2fbe577-d81b-41d1-86f5-d7c0beab16dd
Hargrave, Darren R.
ffb8f016-db32-44c7-9c66-f05b84431164
Morris, Christopher M.
e5a286e3-30c6-401c-9c51-3a9d0a359423
Walker, David
305b146b-bd74-4aec-9dfc-030439b07105
Kennedy, Colin
7c3aff62-0a86-4b44-b7d7-4bc01f23ec93
Bull, Kim
751f8b25-29ba-4d4f-96e2-6c339a83a47f
Stubley, Shelly
c0f620a1-5888-4481-85a8-b7f11a483c12
Freeman, Anita
ebc69b0b-4721-4d04-b54f-ee9e9d3ca004
Liossi, Christina
fd401ad6-581a-4a31-a60b-f8671ffd3558
Darlington, Anne-Sophie
472fcfc9-160b-4344-8113-8dd8760ff962
Grootenhuis, Martha A.
a2fbe577-d81b-41d1-86f5-d7c0beab16dd
Hargrave, Darren R.
ffb8f016-db32-44c7-9c66-f05b84431164
Morris, Christopher M.
e5a286e3-30c6-401c-9c51-3a9d0a359423
Walker, David
305b146b-bd74-4aec-9dfc-030439b07105
Kennedy, Colin
7c3aff62-0a86-4b44-b7d7-4bc01f23ec93

Bull, Kim, Stubley, Shelly, Freeman, Anita, Liossi, Christina, Darlington, Anne-Sophie, Grootenhuis, Martha A., Hargrave, Darren R., Morris, Christopher M., Walker, David and Kennedy, Colin (2021) P06.03 Child, parent, and clinician selection of patient-reported outcome measures to use in pediatric neuro-oncology outpatient follow-up clinics. Neuro-Oncology, 23 (Supplement_2), ii24-ii24. (doi:10.1093/neuonc/noab180.081).

Record type: Meeting abstract

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Survivors of childhood brain tumours are at risk of poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Appropriate and relevant measures can be used to monitor HRQoL so that timely interventions may be made for issues thus identified. We had previously selected patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) with good psychometric properties that had emerged as well-suited for this use in two systematic reviews. The aim of the present study was to ascertain the views of families regarding the suitability of the selected measures for use in paediatric neuro-oncology follow-up clinics. These views were then used to inform the choice of PROMs for use on the KLIK PROM portal, a website designed to gather HRQoL information from families.

MATERIAL AND METHODS
As part of the PROMOTE study, we used a multi-centre, multi-informant, cross-sectional, qualitative methods research design. Using ‘think aloud’ audio-recorded interviews, children aged 8–17 years diagnosed within the previous five years with a brain tumour, off treatment and receiving outpatient care, and their parents, were shown a total of nine PROMs and asked to express their views on which they preferred. Detailed notes were made of all audio-recordings by two independent researchers. The final choice of PROMs to be included on the KLIK PROM portal was agreed through discussion of the PROMs selected by families with an expert panel of clinicians, researchers, and parent representatives.

RESULTS
16 children and 17 parents participated and of these 2 children and 2 parents did not express a preference. The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Core module was the most popular among the children and parents with 7/14 (50%) of children selecting it as either their 1st or 2nd choice citing that they liked the questions and felt them to be most relevant to them, and 8/15 (53%) of parents citing that it was easy, quick and simple, the wording was easy, and they liked the questions about emotional, social, and school functioning. The least popular questionnaires, with no participants selecting them as first choices, were the Kidscreen-10 and the Health Utilities Index. The latter 2 were selected only as 2nd or lower choices by 1 child and 3 parents respectively.

CONCLUSION
The PROMs that were finally selected for the KLIK PROM portal were the parent- and child-report PedsQL-Core measures of HRQoL due to their good psychometric properties, family and clinician preference and perceived relevance to follow-up care, and for clinical utility on the KLIK PROM portal.

Text
noab180.081 - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Published date: 9 September 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 456958
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/456958
ISSN: 1522-8517
PURE UUID: 6297241b-6923-40d9-8256-d7bb12ddf850
ORCID for Kim Bull: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5541-4556
ORCID for Christina Liossi: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0627-6377

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 18 May 2022 16:50
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:04

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Kim Bull ORCID iD
Author: Shelly Stubley
Author: Anita Freeman
Author: Martha A. Grootenhuis
Author: Darren R. Hargrave
Author: Christopher M. Morris
Author: David Walker
Author: Colin Kennedy

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×