A Platform-Agnostic Model and Analysis of Learner Engagement within Peer Supported Digital Environments: FutureLearn MOOCs and PeerWise
A Platform-Agnostic Model and Analysis of Learner Engagement within Peer Supported Digital Environments: FutureLearn MOOCs and PeerWise
Digital technologies have accelerated a conceptual shift in education from traditional face-to-face instruction towards an increasingly asynchronous, online, learner-centred paradigm. Under this paradigm, learners interact both with peers and content matter, leaving traces that can be used to characterise their learning engagement. This is the focus of a growing interest in learning analytics, particularly with data mining algorithms, of which clustering are an important class. These algorithms are however usually applied to datasets from a single platform, leading to platform-specific findings.
This thesis presents a new model of learner engagement within peer-supported digital environments that describes interactions independently of their platform, and can help make meaningful comparisons across contexts. The model was validated by ap- plying a machine-learning approach to datasets from courses in face-to-face instruction and online. Data processed were from a total of 271,851 learners from nineteen courses from the University of Southampton between 2014-2019 on topics on archaeology, lan- guage teaching and human-computer interaction. Seventeen of these were massive open online courses (MOOCs), and the remaining two were in a face-to-face setting that included the use of PeerWise as a peer-supported digital environment.
Feature engineering was performed on timestamped digital traces of activity using this new model, producing sixteen feature files with up to 78 features per learner, which were subjected to the clustering algorithms Expectation Maximization, Simple k-Means and X-Means with k values varying from two to ten. Highly-interpretable clusters were identified by X-Means on dialogic features from datasets from both platforms, allowing for a meaningful comparison of learner engagement across environments. In particular, engagement in both platforms was found to fall in four main activity classes ranging from asocial to fully active social learners; although nuanced behaviours were also evi- denced. Learning design was found to affect the composition of these clusters, and when free of behavioural constraints, learners in the face-to-face environment evidenced the same types of behaviours as those online.
University of Southampton
Wilde, Adriana
4f9174fe-482a-4114-8e81-79b835946224
2021
Wilde, Adriana
4f9174fe-482a-4114-8e81-79b835946224
Millard, David
4f19bca5-80dc-4533-a101-89a5a0e3b372
Wilde, Adriana
(2021)
A Platform-Agnostic Model and Analysis of Learner Engagement within Peer Supported Digital Environments: FutureLearn MOOCs and PeerWise.
Doctoral Thesis, 352pp.
Record type:
Thesis
(Doctoral)
Abstract
Digital technologies have accelerated a conceptual shift in education from traditional face-to-face instruction towards an increasingly asynchronous, online, learner-centred paradigm. Under this paradigm, learners interact both with peers and content matter, leaving traces that can be used to characterise their learning engagement. This is the focus of a growing interest in learning analytics, particularly with data mining algorithms, of which clustering are an important class. These algorithms are however usually applied to datasets from a single platform, leading to platform-specific findings.
This thesis presents a new model of learner engagement within peer-supported digital environments that describes interactions independently of their platform, and can help make meaningful comparisons across contexts. The model was validated by ap- plying a machine-learning approach to datasets from courses in face-to-face instruction and online. Data processed were from a total of 271,851 learners from nineteen courses from the University of Southampton between 2014-2019 on topics on archaeology, lan- guage teaching and human-computer interaction. Seventeen of these were massive open online courses (MOOCs), and the remaining two were in a face-to-face setting that included the use of PeerWise as a peer-supported digital environment.
Feature engineering was performed on timestamped digital traces of activity using this new model, producing sixteen feature files with up to 78 features per learner, which were subjected to the clustering algorithms Expectation Maximization, Simple k-Means and X-Means with k values varying from two to ten. Highly-interpretable clusters were identified by X-Means on dialogic features from datasets from both platforms, allowing for a meaningful comparison of learner engagement across environments. In particular, engagement in both platforms was found to fall in four main activity classes ranging from asocial to fully active social learners; although nuanced behaviours were also evi- denced. Learning design was found to affect the composition of these clusters, and when free of behavioural constraints, learners in the face-to-face environment evidenced the same types of behaviours as those online.
Text
AdrianaThesis-postviva (3)
- Version of Record
Text
SIGNED Permission to deposit thesis
Restricted to Repository staff only
More information
Published date: 2021
Additional Information:
Peer-reviewed journal paper that contains work described as part of this thesis is:
S. Snow, A. Wilde, m.c. schraefel, and P. Denny (2019) “A discursive question:
Supporting student-authored multiple-choice questions through peer-learning software in non-STEMM disciplines”. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50 (4), pp. 1815–1830.
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 457278
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/457278
PURE UUID: 98766d7b-86bc-4871-b906-24417e1bb9ba
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 30 May 2022 16:56
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 07:18
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Adriana Wilde
Thesis advisor:
David Millard
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics