The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Medicare and the Non-Insured Health Benefits and Interim Federal Health Programs: A procedural justice analysis

Medicare and the Non-Insured Health Benefits and Interim Federal Health Programs: A procedural justice analysis
Medicare and the Non-Insured Health Benefits and Interim Federal Health Programs: A procedural justice analysis
Procedural justice in health care goods and services allocation is a necessary, though likely insufficient, condition for a just health care system. Specific health care systems should accordingly be subject to procedural justice analyses. Norman Daniels and James E Sabin’s accountability for reasonableness framework is one of the best accounts of procedural justice in the health care allocation context. This framework requires the public display of decisions and the reasons for health care allocation decisions (“publicity” or “transparency”), the use of publicly accepted or acceptable rationales in those decisions (“acceptance” or “acceptability”), and mechanisms for challenging and/or appealing the decisions (“reviewability”); it may also require legal protection of the fulfillment of the first three conditions (“regulation”). These conditions provide clear metrics for assessing nations’ compliance with their framework account of procedural justice. This article accordingly applies that framework to three pillars of the Canadian health care system – Medicare, the Interim Federal Health Program, and the Non-Insured Health Benefits Program – to assess the extent to which Canada meets the demands of at least one influential account of procedural justice. It ultimately finds serious deficits in the publicity/transparency of the Canadian health care system, which makes it difficult to apply acceptability metrics, but identifies some progressive steps in better compliance with the publicity/transparency and reviewability components of the accountability for reasonableness framework. It also identifies non-drastic measures Canada can take to better achieve Daniels and Sabin’s vision of procedural justice in health care allocation.
Procedural Justice, Health Law, Canadian Law, Medicare, Health Care, Health Systems, Refugee Health, Indigenous Health, Health Policy
101-154
Da Silva, Michael
05ad649f-8409-4012-8edc-88709b1a3182
Da Silva, Michael
05ad649f-8409-4012-8edc-88709b1a3182

Da Silva, Michael (2017) Medicare and the Non-Insured Health Benefits and Interim Federal Health Programs: A procedural justice analysis. McGill Journal of Law and Health, 10 (2), 101-154.

Record type: Article

Abstract

Procedural justice in health care goods and services allocation is a necessary, though likely insufficient, condition for a just health care system. Specific health care systems should accordingly be subject to procedural justice analyses. Norman Daniels and James E Sabin’s accountability for reasonableness framework is one of the best accounts of procedural justice in the health care allocation context. This framework requires the public display of decisions and the reasons for health care allocation decisions (“publicity” or “transparency”), the use of publicly accepted or acceptable rationales in those decisions (“acceptance” or “acceptability”), and mechanisms for challenging and/or appealing the decisions (“reviewability”); it may also require legal protection of the fulfillment of the first three conditions (“regulation”). These conditions provide clear metrics for assessing nations’ compliance with their framework account of procedural justice. This article accordingly applies that framework to three pillars of the Canadian health care system – Medicare, the Interim Federal Health Program, and the Non-Insured Health Benefits Program – to assess the extent to which Canada meets the demands of at least one influential account of procedural justice. It ultimately finds serious deficits in the publicity/transparency of the Canadian health care system, which makes it difficult to apply acceptability metrics, but identifies some progressive steps in better compliance with the publicity/transparency and reviewability components of the accountability for reasonableness framework. It also identifies non-drastic measures Canada can take to better achieve Daniels and Sabin’s vision of procedural justice in health care allocation.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2017
Keywords: Procedural Justice, Health Law, Canadian Law, Medicare, Health Care, Health Systems, Refugee Health, Indigenous Health, Health Policy

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 457413
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/457413
PURE UUID: 558d7c05-941c-423e-996f-c71bbb5639ba

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Jun 2022 16:46
Last modified: 23 Jul 2022 00:24

Export record

Contributors

Author: Michael Da Silva

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×