The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Experiences of psychological interventions in neurodegenerative diseases: a systematic review and thematic synthesis

Experiences of psychological interventions in neurodegenerative diseases: a systematic review and thematic synthesis
Experiences of psychological interventions in neurodegenerative diseases: a systematic review and thematic synthesis
Background: Psychological interventions for managing emotional distress in neurodegenerative diseases are needed, but progressive worsening of symptoms and increasing disability might pose difficulties with engagement. We aimed to synthesise the experiences of engaging with and using psychological interventions in neurodegenerative diseases and identify relevant barriers and facilitators. Methods: Systematic searches were conducted in six electronic databases and results were screened. We included qualitative and mixed methods studies reporting patient or caregivers’ views or experiences of psychological interventions. Qualitative data were extracted and thematically synthesised. Results: 34 papers were included, covering a range of diseases and interventions. Engagement was facilitated by flexible intervention formats and tailoring to the specific needs of people with neurodegenerative diseases. Interventions were sometimes inaccessible or burdensome because of physical and cognitive symptoms, and the time and effort required for the intervention. Participants’ levels of acceptance and readiness often differed and influenced engagement with the intervention. Across different interventions, participants experienced wide-ranging benefits including changes in insight, perspective, self-efficacy, emotions and relationships. Conclusion: Although people with neurodegenerative diseases and caregivers experience benefits from psychological interventions, burden-reducing adaptations and sensitive tailoring to the specific disease context is required to improve acceptability and engagement.
Neurodegenerative disease, psychological intervention, psychosocial intervention, psychotherapy, qualitative evidence synthesis, thematic synthesis
1-23
Pinto, Cathryn, Lisa
8173c095-7b5c-4aca-b44a-86451c93e2fd
Geraghty, Adam
2c6549fe-9868-4806-b65a-21881c1930af
McLoughlin, Charlotte
1d7c15e9-6369-45f9-a240-e15c36cd4a98
Pagnini, Francesco
88e767b4-3a51-4f75-8d00-e4f503b2b794
Yardley, Lucy
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
Dennison, Laura
15c399cb-9a81-4948-8906-21944c033c20
Pinto, Cathryn, Lisa
8173c095-7b5c-4aca-b44a-86451c93e2fd
Geraghty, Adam
2c6549fe-9868-4806-b65a-21881c1930af
McLoughlin, Charlotte
1d7c15e9-6369-45f9-a240-e15c36cd4a98
Pagnini, Francesco
88e767b4-3a51-4f75-8d00-e4f503b2b794
Yardley, Lucy
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
Dennison, Laura
15c399cb-9a81-4948-8906-21944c033c20

Pinto, Cathryn, Lisa, Geraghty, Adam, McLoughlin, Charlotte, Pagnini, Francesco, Yardley, Lucy and Dennison, Laura (2022) Experiences of psychological interventions in neurodegenerative diseases: a systematic review and thematic synthesis. Health Psychology Review, 1-23. (doi:10.1080/17437199.2022.2073901).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Psychological interventions for managing emotional distress in neurodegenerative diseases are needed, but progressive worsening of symptoms and increasing disability might pose difficulties with engagement. We aimed to synthesise the experiences of engaging with and using psychological interventions in neurodegenerative diseases and identify relevant barriers and facilitators. Methods: Systematic searches were conducted in six electronic databases and results were screened. We included qualitative and mixed methods studies reporting patient or caregivers’ views or experiences of psychological interventions. Qualitative data were extracted and thematically synthesised. Results: 34 papers were included, covering a range of diseases and interventions. Engagement was facilitated by flexible intervention formats and tailoring to the specific needs of people with neurodegenerative diseases. Interventions were sometimes inaccessible or burdensome because of physical and cognitive symptoms, and the time and effort required for the intervention. Participants’ levels of acceptance and readiness often differed and influenced engagement with the intervention. Across different interventions, participants experienced wide-ranging benefits including changes in insight, perspective, self-efficacy, emotions and relationships. Conclusion: Although people with neurodegenerative diseases and caregivers experience benefits from psychological interventions, burden-reducing adaptations and sensitive tailoring to the specific disease context is required to improve acceptability and engagement.

Text
17437199.2022 (1) - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (2MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 12 May 2022
Published date: 12 May 2022
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Keywords: Neurodegenerative disease, psychological intervention, psychosocial intervention, psychotherapy, qualitative evidence synthesis, thematic synthesis

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 457457
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/457457
PURE UUID: cdccffc6-6e1c-4155-99a8-b537431fff6d
ORCID for Cathryn, Lisa Pinto: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7607-7192
ORCID for Adam Geraghty: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7984-8351
ORCID for Lucy Yardley: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3853-883X
ORCID for Laura Dennison: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0122-6610

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Jun 2022 16:32
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:21

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Adam Geraghty ORCID iD
Author: Charlotte McLoughlin
Author: Francesco Pagnini
Author: Lucy Yardley ORCID iD
Author: Laura Dennison ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×