The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Statistical methods used to combine the effective reproduction number, R(t), and other related measures of COVID-19 in the UK

Statistical methods used to combine the effective reproduction number, R(t), and other related measures of COVID-19 in the UK
Statistical methods used to combine the effective reproduction number, R(t), and other related measures of COVID-19 in the UK
In the recent COVID-19 pandemic, a wide range of epidemiological modelling approaches have been used topredict the effective reproduction number, R(t), and other COVID-19 related measures such as the daily rate of exponential growth, r(t). These candidate models use different modelling approaches or differing assumptions about spatialor age mixing, and some capture genuine uncertainty in scientific understanding of disease dynamics. Combining estimates using appropriate statistical methodology from multiple candidate models is important to better understandthe variation of these outcome measures to help inform decision making. In this paper, we combine these estimatesfor specific UK nations and regions using random effects meta analyses techniques, utilising the restricted maximumlikelihood (REML) method to estimate the heterogeneity variance parameter, and two approaches to calculate theconfidence interval for the combined estimate: the standard Wald-type intervals; and the Knapp and Hartung (KNHA)method. As estimates in this setting are derived using model predictions, each with varying degrees of uncertainty,equal weighting is favoured over the more standard inverse-variance weighting in order avoid potential up-weighting of models providing estimates with lower levels of uncertainty that are not fully accounting for inherent uncertain ties. Both equally weighted models using REML alone and REML+KNHA approaches were found to provide similar variation for R(t) and r(t), with both approaches providing wider, and therefore more conservative, confidence intervals around the combined estimate compared to the standard inverse-variance weighting approach. Utilising these meta-analysis techniques has allowed for statistically robust combined estimates to be calculated for key COVID-19outcome measures. This in turn allows timely and informed decision making based on all of the available information.
0962-2802
Maishman, Tom
c25ab2a0-8a1c-4aa1-9c39-d210762e407d
Schaap, Stephanie
a32e4102-6438-499d-8b63-7e17b942a6df
Silk, Daniel
fa771280-73f1-44d6-9f92-d15dedfc7670
Nevitt, Sarah J.
782a13bc-019e-4887-b72b-20259781f72b
Woods, David
ae21f7e2-29d9-4f55-98a2-639c5e44c79c
Bowman, Veronica
970ea71c-b12e-4743-b9b3-ec1dbe8401f6
Maishman, Tom
c25ab2a0-8a1c-4aa1-9c39-d210762e407d
Schaap, Stephanie
a32e4102-6438-499d-8b63-7e17b942a6df
Silk, Daniel
fa771280-73f1-44d6-9f92-d15dedfc7670
Nevitt, Sarah J.
782a13bc-019e-4887-b72b-20259781f72b
Woods, David
ae21f7e2-29d9-4f55-98a2-639c5e44c79c
Bowman, Veronica
970ea71c-b12e-4743-b9b3-ec1dbe8401f6

Maishman, Tom, Schaap, Stephanie, Silk, Daniel, Nevitt, Sarah J., Woods, David and Bowman, Veronica (2021) Statistical methods used to combine the effective reproduction number, R(t), and other related measures of COVID-19 in the UK. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. (doi:10.48550/arXiv.2103.01742). (In Press)

Record type: Article

Abstract

In the recent COVID-19 pandemic, a wide range of epidemiological modelling approaches have been used topredict the effective reproduction number, R(t), and other COVID-19 related measures such as the daily rate of exponential growth, r(t). These candidate models use different modelling approaches or differing assumptions about spatialor age mixing, and some capture genuine uncertainty in scientific understanding of disease dynamics. Combining estimates using appropriate statistical methodology from multiple candidate models is important to better understandthe variation of these outcome measures to help inform decision making. In this paper, we combine these estimatesfor specific UK nations and regions using random effects meta analyses techniques, utilising the restricted maximumlikelihood (REML) method to estimate the heterogeneity variance parameter, and two approaches to calculate theconfidence interval for the combined estimate: the standard Wald-type intervals; and the Knapp and Hartung (KNHA)method. As estimates in this setting are derived using model predictions, each with varying degrees of uncertainty,equal weighting is favoured over the more standard inverse-variance weighting in order avoid potential up-weighting of models providing estimates with lower levels of uncertainty that are not fully accounting for inherent uncertain ties. Both equally weighted models using REML alone and REML+KNHA approaches were found to provide similar variation for R(t) and r(t), with both approaches providing wider, and therefore more conservative, confidence intervals around the combined estimate compared to the standard inverse-variance weighting approach. Utilising these meta-analysis techniques has allowed for statistically robust combined estimates to be calculated for key COVID-19outcome measures. This in turn allows timely and informed decision making based on all of the available information.

Text
2103.01742 - Version of Record
Available under License Other.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 5 December 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 457638
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/457638
ISSN: 0962-2802
PURE UUID: 0d4a57d9-099a-4739-8c62-a7a47931faa9
ORCID for David Woods: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7648-429X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 14 Jun 2022 16:49
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:51

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Tom Maishman
Author: Stephanie Schaap
Author: Daniel Silk
Author: Sarah J. Nevitt
Author: David Woods ORCID iD
Author: Veronica Bowman

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×