Psychological impact of caring for critically ill patients during the Covid-19 pandemic and recommendations for staff support
Psychological impact of caring for critically ill patients during the Covid-19 pandemic and recommendations for staff support
Background: reports of significant psychological stress among frontline healthcare workers are emerging from the Covid-19 outbreak in China. Concerningly, these match findings from previous infective outbreaks, which resulted in long-term psychological pathology.
Methods: during the Covid-19 pandemic, a multi-disciplinary cohort of Intensive Care staff completed an online survey of psychological well-being and rated the perceived usefulness of supportive interventions.
Results: sixty per cent of invited staff responded. Seventy-seven per cent reported normal/high level of resilience. Thirty-two staff (35%) reported anxiety of a level at which formal psychological assessment is recommended. Sixteen (14%) staff members reported symptomology suggestive of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Multiple regression analysis revealed a significant relationship between job-related well-being, anxiety (p = 0.003) and PTSD (p = 0.005). Nurses were seven times more likely than doctors to score higher anxiety (OR = 6.8; p = 0.01). Preferred supportive interventions were adequate personal protective equipment, rest facilities and regular breaks. In the subgroup with high anxiety, psychological support was perceived as significantly more useful, with significant reductions reported for rest facilities and PPE.
Discussion: we report concerning levels of anxiety and post-traumatic stress symptomology among intensive care staff during the Covid-19 crisis, significantly impacting job-related well-being. Nurses are disproportionately affected. Overall, physiologically protective supportive interventions were preferred by staff; however, staff with established anxiety desire professional psychological help. Our findings match reports from SARS 2003 and China 2019. To mitigate long-term psychological consequences of caring for patients during a pandemic, easily deliverable protective strategies should be instigated, supported by formal and longer-term psychological support. Particular attention should be paid to developing strategies which support nursing staff.
312-318
Bates, Andrew
46ff2189-9345-45bb-bb83-c90971ccccb4
Ottaway, Julia
cf81f584-2554-43cd-9481-764150659c8f
Moyses, Helen
56434d9c-870f-4539-a66a-c791add44f67
Perrrow, Marcie
a378b9bb-b049-4746-bffe-d9f83243743d
Rushbrook, Sophie
74d92021-57df-4463-b0c6-d93a6f0cfb1f
Cusack, Rebecca
dfb1595f-2792-4f76-ac6d-da027cf40146
1 November 2021
Bates, Andrew
46ff2189-9345-45bb-bb83-c90971ccccb4
Ottaway, Julia
cf81f584-2554-43cd-9481-764150659c8f
Moyses, Helen
56434d9c-870f-4539-a66a-c791add44f67
Perrrow, Marcie
a378b9bb-b049-4746-bffe-d9f83243743d
Rushbrook, Sophie
74d92021-57df-4463-b0c6-d93a6f0cfb1f
Cusack, Rebecca
dfb1595f-2792-4f76-ac6d-da027cf40146
Bates, Andrew, Ottaway, Julia, Moyses, Helen, Perrrow, Marcie, Rushbrook, Sophie and Cusack, Rebecca
(2021)
Psychological impact of caring for critically ill patients during the Covid-19 pandemic and recommendations for staff support.
Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 22 (4), .
(doi:10.1177/1751143720965109).
Abstract
Background: reports of significant psychological stress among frontline healthcare workers are emerging from the Covid-19 outbreak in China. Concerningly, these match findings from previous infective outbreaks, which resulted in long-term psychological pathology.
Methods: during the Covid-19 pandemic, a multi-disciplinary cohort of Intensive Care staff completed an online survey of psychological well-being and rated the perceived usefulness of supportive interventions.
Results: sixty per cent of invited staff responded. Seventy-seven per cent reported normal/high level of resilience. Thirty-two staff (35%) reported anxiety of a level at which formal psychological assessment is recommended. Sixteen (14%) staff members reported symptomology suggestive of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Multiple regression analysis revealed a significant relationship between job-related well-being, anxiety (p = 0.003) and PTSD (p = 0.005). Nurses were seven times more likely than doctors to score higher anxiety (OR = 6.8; p = 0.01). Preferred supportive interventions were adequate personal protective equipment, rest facilities and regular breaks. In the subgroup with high anxiety, psychological support was perceived as significantly more useful, with significant reductions reported for rest facilities and PPE.
Discussion: we report concerning levels of anxiety and post-traumatic stress symptomology among intensive care staff during the Covid-19 crisis, significantly impacting job-related well-being. Nurses are disproportionately affected. Overall, physiologically protective supportive interventions were preferred by staff; however, staff with established anxiety desire professional psychological help. Our findings match reports from SARS 2003 and China 2019. To mitigate long-term psychological consequences of caring for patients during a pandemic, easily deliverable protective strategies should be instigated, supported by formal and longer-term psychological support. Particular attention should be paid to developing strategies which support nursing staff.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 14 October 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 14 October 2020
Published date: 1 November 2021
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 457768
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/457768
ISSN: 1751-1437
PURE UUID: 968d1351-b445-4d7c-a472-3a50c8e1fe28
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 16 Jun 2022 16:37
Last modified: 23 Apr 2024 01:55
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Andrew Bates
Author:
Julia Ottaway
Author:
Helen Moyses
Author:
Marcie Perrrow
Author:
Sophie Rushbrook
Author:
Rebecca Cusack
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics