The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Psychological impact of caring for critically ill patients during the Covid-19 pandemic and recommendations for staff support

Psychological impact of caring for critically ill patients during the Covid-19 pandemic and recommendations for staff support
Psychological impact of caring for critically ill patients during the Covid-19 pandemic and recommendations for staff support
Background: reports of significant psychological stress among frontline healthcare workers are emerging from the Covid-19 outbreak in China. Concerningly, these match findings from previous infective outbreaks, which resulted in long-term psychological pathology.
Methods: during the Covid-19 pandemic, a multi-disciplinary cohort of Intensive Care staff completed an online survey of psychological well-being and rated the perceived usefulness of supportive interventions.
Results: sixty per cent of invited staff responded. Seventy-seven per cent reported normal/high level of resilience. Thirty-two staff (35%) reported anxiety of a level at which formal psychological assessment is recommended. Sixteen (14%) staff members reported symptomology suggestive of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Multiple regression analysis revealed a significant relationship between job-related well-being, anxiety (p = 0.003) and PTSD (p = 0.005). Nurses were seven times more likely than doctors to score higher anxiety (OR = 6.8; p = 0.01). Preferred supportive interventions were adequate personal protective equipment, rest facilities and regular breaks. In the subgroup with high anxiety, psychological support was perceived as significantly more useful, with significant reductions reported for rest facilities and PPE.
Discussion: we report concerning levels of anxiety and post-traumatic stress symptomology among intensive care staff during the Covid-19 crisis, significantly impacting job-related well-being. Nurses are disproportionately affected. Overall, physiologically protective supportive interventions were preferred by staff; however, staff with established anxiety desire professional psychological help. Our findings match reports from SARS 2003 and China 2019. To mitigate long-term psychological consequences of caring for patients during a pandemic, easily deliverable protective strategies should be instigated, supported by formal and longer-term psychological support. Particular attention should be paid to developing strategies which support nursing staff.
1751-1437
312-318
Bates, Andrew
46ff2189-9345-45bb-bb83-c90971ccccb4
Ottaway, Julia
cf81f584-2554-43cd-9481-764150659c8f
Moyses, Helen
56434d9c-870f-4539-a66a-c791add44f67
Perrrow, Marcie
a378b9bb-b049-4746-bffe-d9f83243743d
Rushbrook, Sophie
74d92021-57df-4463-b0c6-d93a6f0cfb1f
Cusack, Rebecca
dfb1595f-2792-4f76-ac6d-da027cf40146
Bates, Andrew
46ff2189-9345-45bb-bb83-c90971ccccb4
Ottaway, Julia
cf81f584-2554-43cd-9481-764150659c8f
Moyses, Helen
56434d9c-870f-4539-a66a-c791add44f67
Perrrow, Marcie
a378b9bb-b049-4746-bffe-d9f83243743d
Rushbrook, Sophie
74d92021-57df-4463-b0c6-d93a6f0cfb1f
Cusack, Rebecca
dfb1595f-2792-4f76-ac6d-da027cf40146

Bates, Andrew, Ottaway, Julia, Moyses, Helen, Perrrow, Marcie, Rushbrook, Sophie and Cusack, Rebecca (2021) Psychological impact of caring for critically ill patients during the Covid-19 pandemic and recommendations for staff support. Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 22 (4), 312-318. (doi:10.1177/1751143720965109).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: reports of significant psychological stress among frontline healthcare workers are emerging from the Covid-19 outbreak in China. Concerningly, these match findings from previous infective outbreaks, which resulted in long-term psychological pathology.
Methods: during the Covid-19 pandemic, a multi-disciplinary cohort of Intensive Care staff completed an online survey of psychological well-being and rated the perceived usefulness of supportive interventions.
Results: sixty per cent of invited staff responded. Seventy-seven per cent reported normal/high level of resilience. Thirty-two staff (35%) reported anxiety of a level at which formal psychological assessment is recommended. Sixteen (14%) staff members reported symptomology suggestive of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Multiple regression analysis revealed a significant relationship between job-related well-being, anxiety (p = 0.003) and PTSD (p = 0.005). Nurses were seven times more likely than doctors to score higher anxiety (OR = 6.8; p = 0.01). Preferred supportive interventions were adequate personal protective equipment, rest facilities and regular breaks. In the subgroup with high anxiety, psychological support was perceived as significantly more useful, with significant reductions reported for rest facilities and PPE.
Discussion: we report concerning levels of anxiety and post-traumatic stress symptomology among intensive care staff during the Covid-19 crisis, significantly impacting job-related well-being. Nurses are disproportionately affected. Overall, physiologically protective supportive interventions were preferred by staff; however, staff with established anxiety desire professional psychological help. Our findings match reports from SARS 2003 and China 2019. To mitigate long-term psychological consequences of caring for patients during a pandemic, easily deliverable protective strategies should be instigated, supported by formal and longer-term psychological support. Particular attention should be paid to developing strategies which support nursing staff.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 14 October 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 14 October 2020
Published date: 1 November 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 457768
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/457768
ISSN: 1751-1437
PURE UUID: 968d1351-b445-4d7c-a472-3a50c8e1fe28
ORCID for Andrew Bates: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3614-0270

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Jun 2022 16:37
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:12

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Andrew Bates ORCID iD
Author: Julia Ottaway
Author: Helen Moyses
Author: Marcie Perrrow
Author: Sophie Rushbrook
Author: Rebecca Cusack

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×