The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The role of unions as working-class representation

The role of unions as working-class representation
The role of unions as working-class representation
Increasing structural inequality in distribution Inequality develops by segregation of social groups. Groups can appear in different constitutions and often have an official and institutionalized form. An important link between social segregation and inequality is capital (Bowles et al., 2009). According to Bowles (2012), the only way of emancipating disadvantaged people is to install regulatory mechanisms which redistribute capital. Thus to pave the way for equality, group consciousness and redistribution processes need to be set in motion. But, the trend in Europe shows an opposite dynamic. There has been an increase in a skewed distribution of income and wealth, which has led to added inequality (Atkinson et al., 2012; Piketty, 2014; Piketty & Zucman, 2013; Therborn, 2012). The distribution of disposable household income since the 1980s has continuously become more unequal in OECD countries. In 1980 the top 10% earned seven times as much as the bottom 10% while in 2014 the top 10% earned 10 times as much. This is because the disposable household income of the top 10% rose further than that of others, and the bottom-income households had higher income losses during and after the economic crisis of 2008. Clearly income inequality has increased (OECD, 2015). This can be seen in the Gini coefficient. The Gini-coefficient shows how national income (or wealth) is distributed. A Gini-coefficient of 1 shows a maximal unequal income distribution in a country whereas a Gini-coefficient of 0 depicts that national incomes are equally distributed within society. Most often values lie between 0.3 and 0.5 (Wilkinson & Pickett, 2010). In the mid-1980s the Gini coefficient of the OECD countries stood at 0.29. By 2013 it had risen to an average of 0.32. Germany, for example, had an increase from 0.25 to 0.30, Sweden from approximately 0.18 to 0.27 and the USA approximately from 0.34 to 0.41 (OECD, 2015).
85-100
Routledge
Kutscher, Gloria
55a9f26b-87ea-4d0d-b8e8-c02caa10bf7d
Hanappi-Egger, Edeltraud
858703e9-6e8d-4982-9eb6-18b87dd4e347
Hanappi, Hardy
Katsikides, Savvas
Scholz-Wäckerle, Manuel
Kutscher, Gloria
55a9f26b-87ea-4d0d-b8e8-c02caa10bf7d
Hanappi-Egger, Edeltraud
858703e9-6e8d-4982-9eb6-18b87dd4e347
Hanappi, Hardy
Katsikides, Savvas
Scholz-Wäckerle, Manuel

Kutscher, Gloria and Hanappi-Egger, Edeltraud (2017) The role of unions as working-class representation. In, Hanappi, Hardy, Katsikides, Savvas and Scholz-Wäckerle, Manuel (eds.) Theory and Method of Evolutionary Political Economy: A Cyprus symposium. 1 ed. London. Routledge, pp. 85-100. (doi:10.4324/9781315470214).

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

Increasing structural inequality in distribution Inequality develops by segregation of social groups. Groups can appear in different constitutions and often have an official and institutionalized form. An important link between social segregation and inequality is capital (Bowles et al., 2009). According to Bowles (2012), the only way of emancipating disadvantaged people is to install regulatory mechanisms which redistribute capital. Thus to pave the way for equality, group consciousness and redistribution processes need to be set in motion. But, the trend in Europe shows an opposite dynamic. There has been an increase in a skewed distribution of income and wealth, which has led to added inequality (Atkinson et al., 2012; Piketty, 2014; Piketty & Zucman, 2013; Therborn, 2012). The distribution of disposable household income since the 1980s has continuously become more unequal in OECD countries. In 1980 the top 10% earned seven times as much as the bottom 10% while in 2014 the top 10% earned 10 times as much. This is because the disposable household income of the top 10% rose further than that of others, and the bottom-income households had higher income losses during and after the economic crisis of 2008. Clearly income inequality has increased (OECD, 2015). This can be seen in the Gini coefficient. The Gini-coefficient shows how national income (or wealth) is distributed. A Gini-coefficient of 1 shows a maximal unequal income distribution in a country whereas a Gini-coefficient of 0 depicts that national incomes are equally distributed within society. Most often values lie between 0.3 and 0.5 (Wilkinson & Pickett, 2010). In the mid-1980s the Gini coefficient of the OECD countries stood at 0.29. By 2013 it had risen to an average of 0.32. Germany, for example, had an increase from 0.25 to 0.30, Sweden from approximately 0.18 to 0.27 and the USA approximately from 0.34 to 0.41 (OECD, 2015).

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 24 January 2017

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 457934
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/457934
PURE UUID: 2c508550-bb6d-48ee-8c55-9eab9b471b63
ORCID for Gloria Kutscher: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5712-8959

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 Jun 2022 16:53
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:09

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Gloria Kutscher ORCID iD
Author: Edeltraud Hanappi-Egger
Editor: Hardy Hanappi
Editor: Savvas Katsikides
Editor: Manuel Scholz-Wäckerle

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×