Mixed-methods evaluation of the NHS Genomic Medicine Service for paediatric rare diseases: study protocol [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
Mixed-methods evaluation of the NHS Genomic Medicine Service for paediatric rare diseases: study protocol [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
BACKGROUND: A new nationally commissioned NHS England Genomic Medicine Service (GMS) was recently established to deliver genomic testing with equity of access for patients affected by rare diseases and cancer. The overarching aim of this research is to evaluate the implementation of the GMS during its early years, identify barriers and enablers to successful implementation, and provide recommendations for practice. The focus will be on the use of genomic testing for paediatric rare diseases.
METHODS: This will be a four-year mixed-methods research programme using clinic observations, interviews and surveys. Study 1 consists of qualitative interviews with designers/implementers of the GMS in Year 1 of the research programme, along with documentary analysis to understand the intended outcomes for the Service. These will be revisited in Year 4 to compare intended outcomes with what happened in practice, and to identify barriers and facilitators that were encountered along the way. Study 2 consists of clinic observations (pre-test counselling and results disclosure) to examine the interaction between health professionals and parents, along with follow-up interviews with both after each observation. Study 3 consists of a longitudinal survey with parents at two timepoints (time of testing and 12 months post-results) along with follow-up interviews, to examine parent-reported experiences and outcomes. Study 4 consists of qualitative interviews and a cross-sectional survey with medical specialists to identify preparedness, facilitators and challenges to mainstreaming genomic testing. The use of theory-based and prespecified constructs will help generalise the findings and enable integration across the various sub-studies.
DISSEMINATION: We will disseminate our results to policymakers as findings emerge, so any suggested changes to service provision can be considered in a timely manner. A workshop with key stakeholders will be held in Year 4 to develop and agree a set of recommendations for practice.
Lewis, Celine
0d8fd29a-c38f-4334-b7d2-969f055f0b48
Buchannan, James
bf87083b-a933-4c46-88ba-35c5eac12351
Clarke, Angus
934116e6-81eb-4f1f-ab9a-ef2b80b933cf
Clement, Emma
7450f248-2ecb-47a2-9c50-113b0bf309c3
Friedrich, Bettina
7fa6a018-c8f1-49d9-bbed-18ea726f0e1d
Hastings-Ward, Jillian
a0fd8ba0-ef70-4e67-b7a5-dea87f3f12ae
Hill, Melissa
2a02772f-043c-4540-bac1-e332ae0c37c5
Horn, Ruth
eb5e881d-9620-42e4-af35-f4f0126a56a5
Lucassen, Anneke M
2eb85efc-c6e8-4c3f-b963-0290f6c038a5
Patch, Chris
b61facf5-2a61-423c-8c42-2482f79ff38e
Pickard, Alexandra
9a7601e3-1219-4138-ae74-34babdd3563e
Roberts, Lauren
dcba6553-7506-42fb-9138-d8b5e8ff47d2
Sanderson, Saskia C
a1f35317-4487-44cf-83d3-c55402510320
Lewell, Sarah L
efc74514-b4cf-49bc-96e7-c8a020a87a48
Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia
ceb0b77c-ca53-48ec-82d9-5d124c426714
Lakhanpaul, Monica
d102fc4a-7e9f-4172-a4dc-d2cccc050a72
Lewis, Celine
0d8fd29a-c38f-4334-b7d2-969f055f0b48
Buchannan, James
bf87083b-a933-4c46-88ba-35c5eac12351
Clarke, Angus
934116e6-81eb-4f1f-ab9a-ef2b80b933cf
Clement, Emma
7450f248-2ecb-47a2-9c50-113b0bf309c3
Friedrich, Bettina
7fa6a018-c8f1-49d9-bbed-18ea726f0e1d
Hastings-Ward, Jillian
a0fd8ba0-ef70-4e67-b7a5-dea87f3f12ae
Hill, Melissa
2a02772f-043c-4540-bac1-e332ae0c37c5
Horn, Ruth
eb5e881d-9620-42e4-af35-f4f0126a56a5
Lucassen, Anneke M
2eb85efc-c6e8-4c3f-b963-0290f6c038a5
Patch, Chris
b61facf5-2a61-423c-8c42-2482f79ff38e
Pickard, Alexandra
9a7601e3-1219-4138-ae74-34babdd3563e
Roberts, Lauren
dcba6553-7506-42fb-9138-d8b5e8ff47d2
Sanderson, Saskia C
a1f35317-4487-44cf-83d3-c55402510320
Lewell, Sarah L
efc74514-b4cf-49bc-96e7-c8a020a87a48
Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia
ceb0b77c-ca53-48ec-82d9-5d124c426714
Lakhanpaul, Monica
d102fc4a-7e9f-4172-a4dc-d2cccc050a72
Lewis, Celine, Buchannan, James, Clarke, Angus, Clement, Emma, Friedrich, Bettina, Hastings-Ward, Jillian, Hill, Melissa, Horn, Ruth, Lucassen, Anneke M, Patch, Chris, Pickard, Alexandra, Roberts, Lauren, Sanderson, Saskia C, Lewell, Sarah L, Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia and Lakhanpaul, Monica
(2021)
Mixed-methods evaluation of the NHS Genomic Medicine Service for paediatric rare diseases: study protocol [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations].
NIHR open research, 1.
(doi:10.3310/nihropenres.13236.1).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A new nationally commissioned NHS England Genomic Medicine Service (GMS) was recently established to deliver genomic testing with equity of access for patients affected by rare diseases and cancer. The overarching aim of this research is to evaluate the implementation of the GMS during its early years, identify barriers and enablers to successful implementation, and provide recommendations for practice. The focus will be on the use of genomic testing for paediatric rare diseases.
METHODS: This will be a four-year mixed-methods research programme using clinic observations, interviews and surveys. Study 1 consists of qualitative interviews with designers/implementers of the GMS in Year 1 of the research programme, along with documentary analysis to understand the intended outcomes for the Service. These will be revisited in Year 4 to compare intended outcomes with what happened in practice, and to identify barriers and facilitators that were encountered along the way. Study 2 consists of clinic observations (pre-test counselling and results disclosure) to examine the interaction between health professionals and parents, along with follow-up interviews with both after each observation. Study 3 consists of a longitudinal survey with parents at two timepoints (time of testing and 12 months post-results) along with follow-up interviews, to examine parent-reported experiences and outcomes. Study 4 consists of qualitative interviews and a cross-sectional survey with medical specialists to identify preparedness, facilitators and challenges to mainstreaming genomic testing. The use of theory-based and prespecified constructs will help generalise the findings and enable integration across the various sub-studies.
DISSEMINATION: We will disseminate our results to policymakers as findings emerge, so any suggested changes to service provision can be considered in a timely manner. A workshop with key stakeholders will be held in Year 4 to develop and agree a set of recommendations for practice.
Text
7295f640-e331-4710-b917-3a1fdcde379e_13236_-_celine_lewis
- Version of Record
Available under License Other.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 22 November 2021
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 458188
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/458188
ISSN: 2633-4402
PURE UUID: 2b4eaf89-ba2f-4a6b-a136-b07bcd108ecd
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 30 Jun 2022 16:41
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:54
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Celine Lewis
Author:
James Buchannan
Author:
Angus Clarke
Author:
Emma Clement
Author:
Bettina Friedrich
Author:
Jillian Hastings-Ward
Author:
Melissa Hill
Author:
Ruth Horn
Author:
Chris Patch
Author:
Alexandra Pickard
Author:
Lauren Roberts
Author:
Saskia C Sanderson
Author:
Sarah L Lewell
Author:
Cecilia Vindrola-Padros
Author:
Monica Lakhanpaul
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics