The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Semantic context and episodic memory

Semantic context and episodic memory
Semantic context and episodic memory

The theoretical and experimental background to Tulving's encoding specificity principle on retrieval cue effectiveness is reviewed and possible theoretical and artifactual explanations are discussed and evaluated.The first study compiled association norms for the material used in Experiments 1-6 by a novel method in which subjects rated word pairs. The results are compared with those of conventional studies.In Experiment I the recall cues were strongly related to the ambiguous (homonym) targets. Hore homonyms were recalled with cues hich bad accompanied them at presentation than with cues equally strongly related to their alternative meetings. The use of act-establishing lists, as employed by Tulving and his colleagues, increased this context effect, but four such lists produced no greater effect than two.Experiment 2 showed the context effect to persist with forced responding, eliminating any explanation in terns of ignoring cues or criterion differences.In Experiment 3 none of the recall cues were presented with the study list. However, more target homonyms were recalled when the recall cues were related to the meanings primed by the presentation context than when they were equally strongly related to the alternative meanings. This suggests a semantic interpretation of encoding specificity.Experiment 4 was a cued recall experiment designed to test explanations of encoding specificity which claim that it results from multiple internal representations (nodes) of ambiguous words. The results are interpreted in terms of episodic theory and as incompatible with multi-node models. However, an alternative interpretation of Experiment 4 holds the results to be compatible with multi-node models. Experiments 6 and 6 were unsuccessful attempts to eliminate this interpretation by replicating the pattern of results of Experiment 4 using context recognition. Features of these recognition paradigms are identified which may have prevented the pattern from emerging. A paradigm which avoids these features is suggested.

University of Southampton
Harris, John Edward
Harris, John Edward

Harris, John Edward (1977) Semantic context and episodic memory. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

The theoretical and experimental background to Tulving's encoding specificity principle on retrieval cue effectiveness is reviewed and possible theoretical and artifactual explanations are discussed and evaluated.The first study compiled association norms for the material used in Experiments 1-6 by a novel method in which subjects rated word pairs. The results are compared with those of conventional studies.In Experiment I the recall cues were strongly related to the ambiguous (homonym) targets. Hore homonyms were recalled with cues hich bad accompanied them at presentation than with cues equally strongly related to their alternative meetings. The use of act-establishing lists, as employed by Tulving and his colleagues, increased this context effect, but four such lists produced no greater effect than two.Experiment 2 showed the context effect to persist with forced responding, eliminating any explanation in terns of ignoring cues or criterion differences.In Experiment 3 none of the recall cues were presented with the study list. However, more target homonyms were recalled when the recall cues were related to the meanings primed by the presentation context than when they were equally strongly related to the alternative meanings. This suggests a semantic interpretation of encoding specificity.Experiment 4 was a cued recall experiment designed to test explanations of encoding specificity which claim that it results from multiple internal representations (nodes) of ambiguous words. The results are interpreted in terms of episodic theory and as incompatible with multi-node models. However, an alternative interpretation of Experiment 4 holds the results to be compatible with multi-node models. Experiments 6 and 6 were unsuccessful attempts to eliminate this interpretation by replicating the pattern of results of Experiment 4 using context recognition. Features of these recognition paradigms are identified which may have prevented the pattern from emerging. A paradigm which avoids these features is suggested.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1977

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 458420
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/458420
PURE UUID: d4d8d951-a3b7-448f-ad39-f237b08fe35c

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Jul 2022 16:48
Last modified: 04 Jul 2022 16:48

Export record

Contributors

Author: John Edward Harris

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×