The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Zooplankton production and energy flow : towards a biological model of Southampton Water

Zooplankton production and energy flow : towards a biological model of Southampton Water
Zooplankton production and energy flow : towards a biological model of Southampton Water

Growth rates, production and the ecology of calanoid copepods, together with abundance of meroplankton, were examined within Southampton Water, U.K. Estimated biomass values of calanoid copepods are greater in the inner estuary (ie. total range found was between 0.0206 and 17.844mgCm-3 at Cracknore), and lower at the mouth of the estuary (ie. between 0.0006 and 15.175mgCm-3 at Calshot). Estimated annual calanoid copepod production rates were typically <290mgCm-3yr-1 at the estuary mouth, while mid-estuary rates averaged �530mgCm-3yr-1. Estimates of other pelagic and benthic components were also derived to allow a box model of annual carbon production rates of the dominant compartments to be established. Calanoid copepod annual production rates represent around 0.5% of total annual primary production, while estimates of ciliate annual production were 6.2 to 9.3 times greater than the copepod rates. This study therefore confirms the dominance of the microbial community in this area with regard to carbon ingestion and production.

Calanoid copepod weight-specific growth rates were found to vary between 0.008 to 0.378d-1 when measured in situ at Calshot. Biomass of calanoid copepods was very low in comparison to many other temperate areas, which may be the result of high flushing rates and the relatively lower growth rates. The calanoid production rates are lower than in most other estuarine and neritic areas previously studied. Gelatinous predators within the estuary appear to have strong impacts upon mesozooplankton numbers at times, even though their apparent production and ingestion demands are much less than in many other neritic areas. These impacts are pronounced as a result of the low biomass and production rates of calanoids. Annual gelatinous production rates were higher in the upper estuary, where they reach 27.5mgCm-3yr-1 at Cracknore, with annual ingestion demands at the same site reaching 77.2mgCm-3yr-1. At the mouth of the estuary gelatinous production ingestion demands are little over 1.6mgCm-3yr-1. The gelatinous predators may prey heavily upon meroplanktonic larvae in addition to copepods, the initial weight of such meroplankton is highlighted as a potentially important source for these predators, and as a benthic-pelagic energy-matter pathway.

University of Southampton
Hirst, Andrew Garwood
6905a4cc-2986-4952-b51d-459af810244e
Hirst, Andrew Garwood
6905a4cc-2986-4952-b51d-459af810244e

Hirst, Andrew Garwood (1996) Zooplankton production and energy flow : towards a biological model of Southampton Water. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Growth rates, production and the ecology of calanoid copepods, together with abundance of meroplankton, were examined within Southampton Water, U.K. Estimated biomass values of calanoid copepods are greater in the inner estuary (ie. total range found was between 0.0206 and 17.844mgCm-3 at Cracknore), and lower at the mouth of the estuary (ie. between 0.0006 and 15.175mgCm-3 at Calshot). Estimated annual calanoid copepod production rates were typically <290mgCm-3yr-1 at the estuary mouth, while mid-estuary rates averaged �530mgCm-3yr-1. Estimates of other pelagic and benthic components were also derived to allow a box model of annual carbon production rates of the dominant compartments to be established. Calanoid copepod annual production rates represent around 0.5% of total annual primary production, while estimates of ciliate annual production were 6.2 to 9.3 times greater than the copepod rates. This study therefore confirms the dominance of the microbial community in this area with regard to carbon ingestion and production.

Calanoid copepod weight-specific growth rates were found to vary between 0.008 to 0.378d-1 when measured in situ at Calshot. Biomass of calanoid copepods was very low in comparison to many other temperate areas, which may be the result of high flushing rates and the relatively lower growth rates. The calanoid production rates are lower than in most other estuarine and neritic areas previously studied. Gelatinous predators within the estuary appear to have strong impacts upon mesozooplankton numbers at times, even though their apparent production and ingestion demands are much less than in many other neritic areas. These impacts are pronounced as a result of the low biomass and production rates of calanoids. Annual gelatinous production rates were higher in the upper estuary, where they reach 27.5mgCm-3yr-1 at Cracknore, with annual ingestion demands at the same site reaching 77.2mgCm-3yr-1. At the mouth of the estuary gelatinous production ingestion demands are little over 1.6mgCm-3yr-1. The gelatinous predators may prey heavily upon meroplanktonic larvae in addition to copepods, the initial weight of such meroplankton is highlighted as a potentially important source for these predators, and as a benthic-pelagic energy-matter pathway.

Text
224053.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (23MB)

More information

Published date: 1996

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 459866
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/459866
PURE UUID: f7445ad3-c811-4388-af82-2909d7daba22

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Jul 2022 17:20
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 18:34

Export record

Contributors

Author: Andrew Garwood Hirst

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×