The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Language and identity in Galicia : the current orthographic debate

Language and identity in Galicia : the current orthographic debate
Language and identity in Galicia : the current orthographic debate

Galicia is one of the seventeen Autonomous Communities which constitute the Spanish state. It consists of four provinces, Pontevedra, Corunna, Lugo and Orense, and is situated on the north-west of Spain. Two languages are recognised as co-official within Galicia: Galician and Castilian. The Real Academia Galega and the Instituto da Lingua Galega agreed an orthographic and morphological norma (standard) for Galician in July 1982, which was approved by the Xunta, the Galician local government. In spite of this, there are groups who contend that Galician should be written to a greater or lesser extent like Portuguese, rather than like these normas. This orthographic debate, between the tendencies known as Reintegracionista and Independentista, is the focus of this thesis, not in terms of which orthography may technically be the more appropriate way to write Galician, but in terms of what issues lie behind the debate.

Given that speech developed long before writing, that individuals learn to speak before they learn to write and that writing is absent from some societies, some commentators would argue that spoken language is much more important than written language. In the case of Galician, however, more than a decade after the normas were approved by the Xunta, there is still debate about how the language should be written. If spoken language is more important than written language, why do these different positions exist?

The process of prescribing normas is part of language corpus planning. Language planning is generally not carried out solely to improve communication, but rather in order to achieve non-linguistic ends, such as national integration, political control, economic development, and so no. The Reintegracionista-Independentista debate is ostensibly a debate about Galician orthography, that is, a debate rooted in the corpus of the language, but in reality it is a debate about non-linguistic issues.

University of Southampton
Henderson, Tracy Karen
21c022d3-eced-478f-ab52-77df2e5f5382
Henderson, Tracy Karen
21c022d3-eced-478f-ab52-77df2e5f5382

Henderson, Tracy Karen (1996) Language and identity in Galicia : the current orthographic debate. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Galicia is one of the seventeen Autonomous Communities which constitute the Spanish state. It consists of four provinces, Pontevedra, Corunna, Lugo and Orense, and is situated on the north-west of Spain. Two languages are recognised as co-official within Galicia: Galician and Castilian. The Real Academia Galega and the Instituto da Lingua Galega agreed an orthographic and morphological norma (standard) for Galician in July 1982, which was approved by the Xunta, the Galician local government. In spite of this, there are groups who contend that Galician should be written to a greater or lesser extent like Portuguese, rather than like these normas. This orthographic debate, between the tendencies known as Reintegracionista and Independentista, is the focus of this thesis, not in terms of which orthography may technically be the more appropriate way to write Galician, but in terms of what issues lie behind the debate.

Given that speech developed long before writing, that individuals learn to speak before they learn to write and that writing is absent from some societies, some commentators would argue that spoken language is much more important than written language. In the case of Galician, however, more than a decade after the normas were approved by the Xunta, there is still debate about how the language should be written. If spoken language is more important than written language, why do these different positions exist?

The process of prescribing normas is part of language corpus planning. Language planning is generally not carried out solely to improve communication, but rather in order to achieve non-linguistic ends, such as national integration, political control, economic development, and so no. The Reintegracionista-Independentista debate is ostensibly a debate about Galician orthography, that is, a debate rooted in the corpus of the language, but in reality it is a debate about non-linguistic issues.

Text
286273.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (13MB)

More information

Published date: 1996

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 460299
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/460299
PURE UUID: 96a30bbe-aacd-44c8-b91f-e97ceb36f276

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Jul 2022 18:18
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 18:37

Export record

Contributors

Author: Tracy Karen Henderson

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×