The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The early Prelude : texts and contexts

The early Prelude : texts and contexts
The early Prelude : texts and contexts

This thesis works from the assumption that there is no privileged core-text of the Prelude, but instead a series of texts (representing more or less settled textual states) of to some extent uncertain historical relations and which are all of independent interest. It claims that the early (1798-99) and later (1804-05) texts encourage different kinds of readings, and examines the unsettling effect of such a polymorphous poem on current editorial thinking. The two-part Prelude of 1798-99 is considered as a composite and discontinuous text, inassimilable to any system of generic conventions, which filters so many styles and resonances of earlier writers that it is difficult to isolate within it a finite Wordsworthian idiom. The composition of 1804-05 is seen as redefining and restructuring the poem within the context of the epic tradition, and it is argued that in its later states the poem offers to be read alongside other works in that tradition -particularly Milton's Paradise Lost. A discussion of modern theories of poetic influence is prefixed to a full analysis of the semantic tension between these two works. Two ways of reading between poems (which demarcate both individual 'allusions' and habitual usage) are posited, and put on trial in actual interpretation.Complexities surrounding the projected five-Hook Prelude (which is proven to be irrecoverable) are taken as exemplary of the inappositeness of attempts to rationalise the poem's history in the interests of either a postulated 'final form' or a series of 'versions.' The methods and assumptions of Anglo-American textual criticism are re-evaluated and suggestions made as to how they might be democratised.

University of Southampton
Jarvis, Robin James
Jarvis, Robin James

Jarvis, Robin James (1982) The early Prelude : texts and contexts. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

This thesis works from the assumption that there is no privileged core-text of the Prelude, but instead a series of texts (representing more or less settled textual states) of to some extent uncertain historical relations and which are all of independent interest. It claims that the early (1798-99) and later (1804-05) texts encourage different kinds of readings, and examines the unsettling effect of such a polymorphous poem on current editorial thinking. The two-part Prelude of 1798-99 is considered as a composite and discontinuous text, inassimilable to any system of generic conventions, which filters so many styles and resonances of earlier writers that it is difficult to isolate within it a finite Wordsworthian idiom. The composition of 1804-05 is seen as redefining and restructuring the poem within the context of the epic tradition, and it is argued that in its later states the poem offers to be read alongside other works in that tradition -particularly Milton's Paradise Lost. A discussion of modern theories of poetic influence is prefixed to a full analysis of the semantic tension between these two works. Two ways of reading between poems (which demarcate both individual 'allusions' and habitual usage) are posited, and put on trial in actual interpretation.Complexities surrounding the projected five-Hook Prelude (which is proven to be irrecoverable) are taken as exemplary of the inappositeness of attempts to rationalise the poem's history in the interests of either a postulated 'final form' or a series of 'versions.' The methods and assumptions of Anglo-American textual criticism are re-evaluated and suggestions made as to how they might be democratised.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1982

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 460330
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/460330
PURE UUID: 73e6f2b7-1c75-487a-88e1-636c42c3ffef

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Jul 2022 18:18
Last modified: 04 Jul 2022 18:18

Export record

Contributors

Author: Robin James Jarvis

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×