The role of the metaphor in modern critical approaches to Shakespeare
The role of the metaphor in modern critical approaches to Shakespeare
This thesis is a response to the tendency of many modern critics to attach special importance to Shakespeare's use of the metaphor. The questions from which it grew are: How have critics since Bradley conceived of the meraphor; and how ha-:e their ideas about the metaphor influenced their readir.:s of Sha' & .espeare?The inquiry in the main is confined to the work of critics who came to prominence in the 1930's: J. Middleton Murry, G. Wilson Knight, Caroline Spurgeon, W. Clemen, V. Empson, F.R. Leavis, L.C. Knights and D.A. Traversi.Seen in the light of a theory of the metaphor suggested by Ryle and enlarged by other analysts of language, the ideas about the metaphor of some of these critics are shown to be confused or mistaken. The notion that the metaphor register a similarity or focuses a meaning that exists before its formulation in metaphorical form is the most frequent and far-reaching error.Against this is set a view that defines the metaphor as a deliberate 'category-mistake', or a breach of logical propriety. The metaphor is regarded as presenting something in the idiom appropriate to something else, of a different logical category. Meaning ensues from the interaction of the taco terms: thou-:hts associated with one term are active with thoughts associated with the other.The fallacy that the metaphor embodies an insight that is pre-verbal becomes especially significant; in the work of Wilson Knight; in a celebrated statement, endorsed by several critics, he likens the Shakespearean play to an 'expanded metaphor'. A mistaken conception of the metaphor is thus held up as a model of the Shakespearean play. Moreover, Wilson Knight's interpretation of his model is seer, to correspond point for point with Eliot's conception of the work of art as an 'objective correlative'.Wilson Knight's model and Eliot's theory unite in misdirecting critical attention; a major effect is apparent in some modern assessments of Hamlet and Othello. Critical attention is directed away from the plays themselves to a 'vision' or 'philosophy', which the play is supposed to project. The outcome is an impaired responsiveness to the living irnediacy of the plays and a tendency to interpret a hypothetical 'vision' rather than the actual play.
University of Southampton
1975
Edmunds, Donald Paul
(1975)
The role of the metaphor in modern critical approaches to Shakespeare.
University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.
Record type:
Thesis
(Doctoral)
Abstract
This thesis is a response to the tendency of many modern critics to attach special importance to Shakespeare's use of the metaphor. The questions from which it grew are: How have critics since Bradley conceived of the meraphor; and how ha-:e their ideas about the metaphor influenced their readir.:s of Sha' & .espeare?The inquiry in the main is confined to the work of critics who came to prominence in the 1930's: J. Middleton Murry, G. Wilson Knight, Caroline Spurgeon, W. Clemen, V. Empson, F.R. Leavis, L.C. Knights and D.A. Traversi.Seen in the light of a theory of the metaphor suggested by Ryle and enlarged by other analysts of language, the ideas about the metaphor of some of these critics are shown to be confused or mistaken. The notion that the metaphor register a similarity or focuses a meaning that exists before its formulation in metaphorical form is the most frequent and far-reaching error.Against this is set a view that defines the metaphor as a deliberate 'category-mistake', or a breach of logical propriety. The metaphor is regarded as presenting something in the idiom appropriate to something else, of a different logical category. Meaning ensues from the interaction of the taco terms: thou-:hts associated with one term are active with thoughts associated with the other.The fallacy that the metaphor embodies an insight that is pre-verbal becomes especially significant; in the work of Wilson Knight; in a celebrated statement, endorsed by several critics, he likens the Shakespearean play to an 'expanded metaphor'. A mistaken conception of the metaphor is thus held up as a model of the Shakespearean play. Moreover, Wilson Knight's interpretation of his model is seer, to correspond point for point with Eliot's conception of the work of art as an 'objective correlative'.Wilson Knight's model and Eliot's theory unite in misdirecting critical attention; a major effect is apparent in some modern assessments of Hamlet and Othello. Critical attention is directed away from the plays themselves to a 'vision' or 'philosophy', which the play is supposed to project. The outcome is an impaired responsiveness to the living irnediacy of the plays and a tendency to interpret a hypothetical 'vision' rather than the actual play.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1975
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 462102
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/462102
PURE UUID: b39820ec-2086-46a9-be57-0271926ee0aa
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 04 Jul 2022 19:02
Last modified: 04 Jul 2022 19:02
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Donald Paul Edmunds
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics