The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Bronzework of mainland Greece, from c.2600 B.C. to c.1450 B.C.

Bronzework of mainland Greece, from c.2600 B.C. to c.1450 B.C.
Bronzework of mainland Greece, from c.2600 B.C. to c.1450 B.C.

The widespread use of copper and bronze objects started in the Early Helladic II period on the mainland. Although the bronzework of this period appears basically Anatolian in origin, it seems to have developed independently, adjusting itself to new demands and situations. Whereas there are signs of Anatolian and Cycladic links with the metalwork of ER II mainland, there is no such link with Crete.Daring the following ES III-IM II period we find a sudden recession in the mainland metal industry; but a few of the remaining copper and bronze objects show that the connection with the Cyclades and Anatolia was not broken. The EH III-YR II metal objects appear to have evolved directly from E$ II forms. The distribution of metallurgical centres in the Middle Helladic period suggests that new centres started producing metal objects. Tha new sophisticated weapons produced testify to the high level of craftsmanship of the smiths. The widespread distribution of similar types of weapons and knives throughout the mainland indicates internal trade of such objects. The metal analyses of EH-IC objects suggest the use of tin bronze on the mainland from the beginning of the Early Helladic II period.During the last phase of the Middle Helladic period we find evidence of growing prosperity on the mainland, due to the interaction of Cretan influence and Middle Helladic prosperity. Most of the bronzework during the Shaft Grave and the following periods is indigenous, particularly the weaponry. Craftsmen elsewhere on the nsinlnv also produced similar objects in the Early Mycenaean period, and we find: evidence for bronze armour for the first time.Thus, it is clear that much of the bronzework f the mainland should now be regarded as the product of an indigenous development, conditioned by local demands, and not simply imports from other regions of the Aegean.

University of Southampton
Tripathi, Daya Nath
Tripathi, Daya Nath

Tripathi, Daya Nath (1976) Bronzework of mainland Greece, from c.2600 B.C. to c.1450 B.C. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

The widespread use of copper and bronze objects started in the Early Helladic II period on the mainland. Although the bronzework of this period appears basically Anatolian in origin, it seems to have developed independently, adjusting itself to new demands and situations. Whereas there are signs of Anatolian and Cycladic links with the metalwork of ER II mainland, there is no such link with Crete.Daring the following ES III-IM II period we find a sudden recession in the mainland metal industry; but a few of the remaining copper and bronze objects show that the connection with the Cyclades and Anatolia was not broken. The EH III-YR II metal objects appear to have evolved directly from E$ II forms. The distribution of metallurgical centres in the Middle Helladic period suggests that new centres started producing metal objects. Tha new sophisticated weapons produced testify to the high level of craftsmanship of the smiths. The widespread distribution of similar types of weapons and knives throughout the mainland indicates internal trade of such objects. The metal analyses of EH-IC objects suggest the use of tin bronze on the mainland from the beginning of the Early Helladic II period.During the last phase of the Middle Helladic period we find evidence of growing prosperity on the mainland, due to the interaction of Cretan influence and Middle Helladic prosperity. Most of the bronzework during the Shaft Grave and the following periods is indigenous, particularly the weaponry. Craftsmen elsewhere on the nsinlnv also produced similar objects in the Early Mycenaean period, and we find: evidence for bronze armour for the first time.Thus, it is clear that much of the bronzework f the mainland should now be regarded as the product of an indigenous development, conditioned by local demands, and not simply imports from other regions of the Aegean.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1976

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 462315
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/462315
PURE UUID: 0a586387-6e49-4356-bb29-e81b03bf1e33

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Jul 2022 19:05
Last modified: 04 Jul 2022 19:05

Export record

Contributors

Author: Daya Nath Tripathi

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×