The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Ecology of the sand lizard (Lacerta agilis L.) in Southern England and comparisons with the common lizard (Lacerta vivipara jacquin)

Ecology of the sand lizard (Lacerta agilis L.) in Southern England and comparisons with the common lizard (Lacerta vivipara jacquin)
Ecology of the sand lizard (Lacerta agilis L.) in Southern England and comparisons with the common lizard (Lacerta vivipara jacquin)

The ecology of the sand lizard (Lacorta agilis) and the sympatric common lizard (Lacorta vivipara) was studied at two sites in Dorset, England from 1975 to 1977. Lizards wore caught in dry pitfall traps at one site and by hand at the other. Each individual caught was weighed, measured, and marked, before release. Diet was studied by faecal analysis. Both species took invertebrate pray of a variety of types and sizes but there were several taxonomic differences in prey taken. L. gilis took larger and border prcy than L. vivipara. Relationships between prey length and snout-vent length were examined for both species„Prey of L. agilis in spring was smaller, harder, and less diverse than in summer. Food consumption, measured by production of nitrogenous excreta, was lower in spring. Factors affecting production of nitrogenous and faecal excreta were investigated. Faecal excreta was unsuitable as a measure of food consumption for L. agilis because of its relationship with prey hardness.Stomach capacity of L. agilis was much greater than normal daily levels of food consumption. Individuals appeared capable of exploiting locally and seasonally abundant prey by feeding at high rates.Reproductive effort of L. agilis increased with age. Annual adult mortality was estimated as 28%. Densities at both sites wore approximately 50 individuals hectare 1. Sub-adult L. amilis grow faster than sub-adult L. vivipara 3~horgy devoted to growth by different ago classes of both species is compared. Individuals of L. agilis had overlapping home ranges and did not defend territories. It is suggested that home range size is too large to allow resources to be defended. Pitfall traps caught 7 times more L. agilis than L. ivipara. Rates of capture of L. agilis increased with increasing temperature and radiation whereas those of L.vivipara did not.

University of Southampton
Nicholson, Andrew Miles
Nicholson, Andrew Miles

Nicholson, Andrew Miles (1979) Ecology of the sand lizard (Lacerta agilis L.) in Southern England and comparisons with the common lizard (Lacerta vivipara jacquin). University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

The ecology of the sand lizard (Lacorta agilis) and the sympatric common lizard (Lacorta vivipara) was studied at two sites in Dorset, England from 1975 to 1977. Lizards wore caught in dry pitfall traps at one site and by hand at the other. Each individual caught was weighed, measured, and marked, before release. Diet was studied by faecal analysis. Both species took invertebrate pray of a variety of types and sizes but there were several taxonomic differences in prey taken. L. gilis took larger and border prcy than L. vivipara. Relationships between prey length and snout-vent length were examined for both species„Prey of L. agilis in spring was smaller, harder, and less diverse than in summer. Food consumption, measured by production of nitrogenous excreta, was lower in spring. Factors affecting production of nitrogenous and faecal excreta were investigated. Faecal excreta was unsuitable as a measure of food consumption for L. agilis because of its relationship with prey hardness.Stomach capacity of L. agilis was much greater than normal daily levels of food consumption. Individuals appeared capable of exploiting locally and seasonally abundant prey by feeding at high rates.Reproductive effort of L. agilis increased with age. Annual adult mortality was estimated as 28%. Densities at both sites wore approximately 50 individuals hectare 1. Sub-adult L. amilis grow faster than sub-adult L. vivipara 3~horgy devoted to growth by different ago classes of both species is compared. Individuals of L. agilis had overlapping home ranges and did not defend territories. It is suggested that home range size is too large to allow resources to be defended. Pitfall traps caught 7 times more L. agilis than L. ivipara. Rates of capture of L. agilis increased with increasing temperature and radiation whereas those of L.vivipara did not.

Text
429806.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (6MB)

More information

Published date: 1979

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 462459
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/462459
PURE UUID: edc98f28-f590-47db-818c-805d733b4dc4

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Jul 2022 19:08
Last modified: 04 Jul 2022 20:41

Export record

Contributors

Author: Andrew Miles Nicholson

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×