The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Exaggerating current and past performance: motivated self-enhancement versus reconstructive memory

Exaggerating current and past performance: motivated self-enhancement versus reconstructive memory
Exaggerating current and past performance: motivated self-enhancement versus reconstructive memory
The self-as-evaluative base (SEB) hypothesis proposes that self-evaluation extends automatically via an amotivated consistency process to affect evaluation of novel in-groups. Four minimal group studies support SEB. Personal trait self-esteem (PSE) predicted increased favoritism toward a novel in-group that, objectively, was equivalent to the out-group (Study 1). This association was independent of information-processing effects (Study 1), collective self-esteem, right-wing authoritarianism (RWA), and narcissism (Studies 2 and 3). A self-affirmation manipulation attenuated the association between in-group favoritism and an individual difference associated with motivated social identity concerns (RWA) but did not alter the PSE effect (Study 3). Finally, the association between PSE and in-group favoritism remained positive even when the in-group was objectively less favorable than the out-group (Study 4).
0146-1672
1114-1125
Gramzow, Richard H.
59d755fb-4c53-459b-93e8-afdb9709addc
Willard, Greg
86b8b4d6-3c44-44cc-86ed-da0b65189f16
Gramzow, Richard H.
59d755fb-4c53-459b-93e8-afdb9709addc
Willard, Greg
86b8b4d6-3c44-44cc-86ed-da0b65189f16

Gramzow, Richard H. and Willard, Greg (2006) Exaggerating current and past performance: motivated self-enhancement versus reconstructive memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32 (8), 1114-1125. (doi:10.1177/0146167206288600).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The self-as-evaluative base (SEB) hypothesis proposes that self-evaluation extends automatically via an amotivated consistency process to affect evaluation of novel in-groups. Four minimal group studies support SEB. Personal trait self-esteem (PSE) predicted increased favoritism toward a novel in-group that, objectively, was equivalent to the out-group (Study 1). This association was independent of information-processing effects (Study 1), collective self-esteem, right-wing authoritarianism (RWA), and narcissism (Studies 2 and 3). A self-affirmation manipulation attenuated the association between in-group favoritism and an individual difference associated with motivated social identity concerns (RWA) but did not alter the PSE effect (Study 3). Finally, the association between PSE and in-group favoritism remained positive even when the in-group was objectively less favorable than the out-group (Study 4).

Text
7109357.pdf - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only

More information

Published date: 2006

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 46259
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/46259
ISSN: 0146-1672
PURE UUID: 739a5cbe-927d-40c1-8106-72f8f7a554fd

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Jun 2007
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 09:20

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Richard H. Gramzow
Author: Greg Willard

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×