The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Marine high-resolution reflection seismology : acquisition, processing and applications

Marine high-resolution reflection seismology : acquisition, processing and applications
Marine high-resolution reflection seismology : acquisition, processing and applications

Buried wooden artefacts can be readily imaged by Chirp-sourced reflection seismology. Compressional wave velocity parallel to the wood grain (VL) is consistently faster than that across-grain (VR and VT). Theoretical and experimental predictions of reflection coefficients (KR) calculated for wood buried in unconsolidated marine sediments are typically large and negative (KR = +0.27 to -0.79; KRoak = 0.03 to -0.64). Variations in KR are dependent upon the burial-sediment, wood species and structural coherency of the artefact.

Synthetic modelling demonstrates that small changes in the seafloor impedance profile causes random switches in the polarity of the Chirp pulse. Reflection coefficients are calculated from Chirp sub-bottom data using amplitude-time relationships and polarity information derived from trace-mixing. Calculations from Chirp data acquired over a partially buried 17th Century oak-wreck provide an average KR of -0.26, in agreement with the predicted range.

A pseudo 3-dimensional Chirp survey of the excavated Mary Rose wreck site (East Solent, UK) identified two brightspot anomalies, buried to a depth of 4-5 m, trending east-west adjacent to the western margin of the excavation hole. These anomalous reflectors are interpreted as infilled palaeo-scour features associated with the wrecking and subsequent degradation of the Mary Rose. Fill material comprises wreck fragments and coarse sediment sourced from the ship's ballast. Longitudinal scour features were previously unrecognised on the site, and represent the first time such palaeo-scour marks have been recognised in the sedimentary record.

Integrated Chirp and side-scan sonar surveys of the Invincible site (East Solent, UK) demonstrate the capability of high-resolution acoustic techniques to: identify the extent and coherency of semi-exposed wrecks, determine the wrecking history of a site and act as an effective management tool. The distribution of wreck material is primarily controlled by storm-associated wave action, depositing the bulk of fragmented wreck-structure to the north and north-east of the in situ port side. Evidence suggests that current site stability is controlled by a combination of tidally induced currents and anthropogenic activity.

University of Southampton
Quinn, Rory
692c435a-eecc-4f4b-8ec6-b54596ae4ca3
Quinn, Rory
692c435a-eecc-4f4b-8ec6-b54596ae4ca3

Quinn, Rory (1997) Marine high-resolution reflection seismology : acquisition, processing and applications. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Buried wooden artefacts can be readily imaged by Chirp-sourced reflection seismology. Compressional wave velocity parallel to the wood grain (VL) is consistently faster than that across-grain (VR and VT). Theoretical and experimental predictions of reflection coefficients (KR) calculated for wood buried in unconsolidated marine sediments are typically large and negative (KR = +0.27 to -0.79; KRoak = 0.03 to -0.64). Variations in KR are dependent upon the burial-sediment, wood species and structural coherency of the artefact.

Synthetic modelling demonstrates that small changes in the seafloor impedance profile causes random switches in the polarity of the Chirp pulse. Reflection coefficients are calculated from Chirp sub-bottom data using amplitude-time relationships and polarity information derived from trace-mixing. Calculations from Chirp data acquired over a partially buried 17th Century oak-wreck provide an average KR of -0.26, in agreement with the predicted range.

A pseudo 3-dimensional Chirp survey of the excavated Mary Rose wreck site (East Solent, UK) identified two brightspot anomalies, buried to a depth of 4-5 m, trending east-west adjacent to the western margin of the excavation hole. These anomalous reflectors are interpreted as infilled palaeo-scour features associated with the wrecking and subsequent degradation of the Mary Rose. Fill material comprises wreck fragments and coarse sediment sourced from the ship's ballast. Longitudinal scour features were previously unrecognised on the site, and represent the first time such palaeo-scour marks have been recognised in the sedimentary record.

Integrated Chirp and side-scan sonar surveys of the Invincible site (East Solent, UK) demonstrate the capability of high-resolution acoustic techniques to: identify the extent and coherency of semi-exposed wrecks, determine the wrecking history of a site and act as an effective management tool. The distribution of wreck material is primarily controlled by storm-associated wave action, depositing the bulk of fragmented wreck-structure to the north and north-east of the in situ port side. Evidence suggests that current site stability is controlled by a combination of tidally induced currents and anthropogenic activity.

Text
525889.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (15MB)

More information

Published date: 1997

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 463220
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/463220
PURE UUID: eef7829d-753e-400e-b84b-86d0f432a540

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Jul 2022 20:47
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 19:02

Export record

Contributors

Author: Rory Quinn

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×