Torts revolving in statutory orbits : the theory, history and implications in practice of the intersection of tort and regulatory law in a rivers pollution context
Torts revolving in statutory orbits : the theory, history and implications in practice of the intersection of tort and regulatory law in a rivers pollution context
This thesis explores an important general feature of law in a common law jurisdiction, concerning the overlaying upon common law provisions of freestanding provisions of a regulatory law character. A number of standpoints are brought to bear, namely, legal theory, case law, legislative history, and the implementation of regulation in the field. Particular attention is given to the intersection of nuisance and rivers pollution regulation, giving meaning to the tensions and opportunities which arise. Comparisons are made with adjacent tort and regulatory settings, notably chemical pollution and factory safety regulation, reinforcing the message that notwithstanding that the two 'systems' of law are in large part complementary, they are not without significant points of friction too. The broad aim is to identify and critique contrasting 'Blackstonian' and 'Benthamite' images of law which, it will be argued, dominate the relevant academic discussion in such a way as to obscure the need for critical reflection on the intersection at hand.
University of Southampton
Pontin, Benjamin John
ef2413ba-a058-4400-b240-4866473afc6e
1998
Pontin, Benjamin John
ef2413ba-a058-4400-b240-4866473afc6e
Pontin, Benjamin John
(1998)
Torts revolving in statutory orbits : the theory, history and implications in practice of the intersection of tort and regulatory law in a rivers pollution context.
University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.
Record type:
Thesis
(Doctoral)
Abstract
This thesis explores an important general feature of law in a common law jurisdiction, concerning the overlaying upon common law provisions of freestanding provisions of a regulatory law character. A number of standpoints are brought to bear, namely, legal theory, case law, legislative history, and the implementation of regulation in the field. Particular attention is given to the intersection of nuisance and rivers pollution regulation, giving meaning to the tensions and opportunities which arise. Comparisons are made with adjacent tort and regulatory settings, notably chemical pollution and factory safety regulation, reinforcing the message that notwithstanding that the two 'systems' of law are in large part complementary, they are not without significant points of friction too. The broad aim is to identify and critique contrasting 'Blackstonian' and 'Benthamite' images of law which, it will be argued, dominate the relevant academic discussion in such a way as to obscure the need for critical reflection on the intersection at hand.
Text
633889.pdf
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: 1998
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 463428
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/463428
PURE UUID: aaaf2ed7-0895-4de5-adcd-93461095a3f5
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 04 Jul 2022 20:51
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 19:04
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Benjamin John Pontin
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics