The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Fine spatial resolution satellite sensor imagery for per-field land cover classification

Fine spatial resolution satellite sensor imagery for per-field land cover classification
Fine spatial resolution satellite sensor imagery for per-field land cover classification

Land cover information is a useful aid to our understanding and management of the environment. Commonly, the only means of obtaining affordable land cover information at the national scale is via remote sensing. National land cover mapping has been relatively inaccurate and uninformative due to the limited detail provided by coarse spatial resolution satellite sensor imagery. Currently, the finest spatial resolution multispectral satellite sensor imagery in common use is 20 m. Within the next few years, however, finer spatial resolution satellite sensor imagery will become available widely, enabling considerably smaller land cover features to be identified. Notably, three satellite sensors are due for launch within the next year (IKONOS 2, QuickBird, OrbView-3), capable of generating 4 m spatial resolution multispectral imagery.

The potential of fine spatial resolution satellite sensor imagery for national land cover and land use mapping was demonstrated. Airborne sensor imagery was used as a substitute for forthcoming satellite sensor imagery and two local scale studies were used to draw general conclusions of relevance to the remote sensing of land cover at the national scale. Per-pixel classification, the traditional method of mapping from remotely sensed imagery, was relatively inaccurate due to within-field variation. Per-field classification, achieved by integrating remotely sensed imagery with cartographic vector data, was considerably more accurate due to the removal of within-field variation. Fine spatial resolution satellite sensor imagery was of particular value where detailed information was required, such as in urban areas or to generate within-field texture-based measures of discrimination.

Generally, land cover was classified more accurately than land use, since the former was identifiable directly from remotely sensed imagery but the latter was not. Overall, it was demonstrated that per-field classification of forthcoming fine spatial resolution satellite sensor imagery will enable more accurate and informative national land cover mapping than current coarse spatial resolution satellite sensor imagery, thereby increasing our ability to understand and manage the environment.

University of Southampton
Aplin, Paul
028e6bee-05ef-4ea8-8ad0-0da3948583ce
Aplin, Paul
028e6bee-05ef-4ea8-8ad0-0da3948583ce

Aplin, Paul (1999) Fine spatial resolution satellite sensor imagery for per-field land cover classification. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Land cover information is a useful aid to our understanding and management of the environment. Commonly, the only means of obtaining affordable land cover information at the national scale is via remote sensing. National land cover mapping has been relatively inaccurate and uninformative due to the limited detail provided by coarse spatial resolution satellite sensor imagery. Currently, the finest spatial resolution multispectral satellite sensor imagery in common use is 20 m. Within the next few years, however, finer spatial resolution satellite sensor imagery will become available widely, enabling considerably smaller land cover features to be identified. Notably, three satellite sensors are due for launch within the next year (IKONOS 2, QuickBird, OrbView-3), capable of generating 4 m spatial resolution multispectral imagery.

The potential of fine spatial resolution satellite sensor imagery for national land cover and land use mapping was demonstrated. Airborne sensor imagery was used as a substitute for forthcoming satellite sensor imagery and two local scale studies were used to draw general conclusions of relevance to the remote sensing of land cover at the national scale. Per-pixel classification, the traditional method of mapping from remotely sensed imagery, was relatively inaccurate due to within-field variation. Per-field classification, achieved by integrating remotely sensed imagery with cartographic vector data, was considerably more accurate due to the removal of within-field variation. Fine spatial resolution satellite sensor imagery was of particular value where detailed information was required, such as in urban areas or to generate within-field texture-based measures of discrimination.

Generally, land cover was classified more accurately than land use, since the former was identifiable directly from remotely sensed imagery but the latter was not. Overall, it was demonstrated that per-field classification of forthcoming fine spatial resolution satellite sensor imagery will enable more accurate and informative national land cover mapping than current coarse spatial resolution satellite sensor imagery, thereby increasing our ability to understand and manage the environment.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1999

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 463744
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/463744
PURE UUID: 2fc41dee-bde3-46d0-984a-56449c147767

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Jul 2022 20:56
Last modified: 23 Jul 2022 02:15

Export record

Contributors

Author: Paul Aplin

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×