The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Response timing and interval estimation in ADHD

Response timing and interval estimation in ADHD
Response timing and interval estimation in ADHD

Current theories of childhood ADHD stress motivational (Van der Meere, 1996), under arousal (Zentall & Zentall, 1993) or inhibitory difficulties (Barkley, 1997; Quay, 1988a, b). Also these children may exhibit an aversion to delay (Sonuga-Barke et al, 1992a, b and 1996). Underpinning all these approaches may be a difficulty with temporal estimation but little robust research has been carried out to test this hypothesis. This research was designed to test the ability of ADHD children to time responses and on an interval reproduction task.

21 ADHD children in middle childhood and 19 very young ADHD children were matched with controls (20 and 19 respectively). They were given a timing task and an interval reproduction task on a computer in baseline and contingency schedules. There were 30 trials for each task, alternating between trials for the older children and alternating blocks of 10 trials for the younger children. The timing trials required the older children to halt a caricature, after 7secs. on an ascending escalator over an arrow shown under the escalator. The interval reproduction task required the older children to estimate when the caricature had reached the arrow as the ascending caricature was obscured by a tunnel for the latter half of the ascent, giving an interval for reproduction of 3.5 seconds. The timing task for the younger children required them to drop toy bricks into a modified electric toy train as it passed under a central hopper feed, using a remote button, as it ran backwards and forwards along 165cm. of track. Optimum response time was app. 3 secs. In the interval reproduction task, the younger children were required to estimate when the train was under the hopper feed as a tunnel obscured a central section of track. The time for reproduction was approx. 1.5secs.

On the timing task, the older control group achieved performance close to ceiling, which gave them consistently higher hit scores. The performance of ADHD children was characterised by persistent premature responding especially in the contingency schedules. As a consequence of the control group performance these findings understate the difficulty that this task posed for the ADHD children.

University of Southampton
Beaumont, Stephen
Beaumont, Stephen

Beaumont, Stephen (1998) Response timing and interval estimation in ADHD. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Current theories of childhood ADHD stress motivational (Van der Meere, 1996), under arousal (Zentall & Zentall, 1993) or inhibitory difficulties (Barkley, 1997; Quay, 1988a, b). Also these children may exhibit an aversion to delay (Sonuga-Barke et al, 1992a, b and 1996). Underpinning all these approaches may be a difficulty with temporal estimation but little robust research has been carried out to test this hypothesis. This research was designed to test the ability of ADHD children to time responses and on an interval reproduction task.

21 ADHD children in middle childhood and 19 very young ADHD children were matched with controls (20 and 19 respectively). They were given a timing task and an interval reproduction task on a computer in baseline and contingency schedules. There were 30 trials for each task, alternating between trials for the older children and alternating blocks of 10 trials for the younger children. The timing trials required the older children to halt a caricature, after 7secs. on an ascending escalator over an arrow shown under the escalator. The interval reproduction task required the older children to estimate when the caricature had reached the arrow as the ascending caricature was obscured by a tunnel for the latter half of the ascent, giving an interval for reproduction of 3.5 seconds. The timing task for the younger children required them to drop toy bricks into a modified electric toy train as it passed under a central hopper feed, using a remote button, as it ran backwards and forwards along 165cm. of track. Optimum response time was app. 3 secs. In the interval reproduction task, the younger children were required to estimate when the train was under the hopper feed as a tunnel obscured a central section of track. The time for reproduction was approx. 1.5secs.

On the timing task, the older control group achieved performance close to ceiling, which gave them consistently higher hit scores. The performance of ADHD children was characterised by persistent premature responding especially in the contingency schedules. As a consequence of the control group performance these findings understate the difficulty that this task posed for the ADHD children.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1998

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 463779
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/463779
PURE UUID: 24fc76d8-be16-421c-8a20-66a6d74e56fd

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Jul 2022 20:57
Last modified: 04 Jul 2022 20:57

Export record

Contributors

Author: Stephen Beaumont

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×