Geostatistical prediction of vegetation amount using ground and remotely sensed data
Geostatistical prediction of vegetation amount using ground and remotely sensed data
Geostatistical methods, which assume spatial dependence, have an untapped potential to map vegetation amount using ancillary data from remote sensing images. Two geostatistical methods, cokriging and conditional simulation, were constructed with aspatial regression in terms of their accuracy and uncertainty description.
For a synthetic data set constructed from imaging spectrometer data, spatial regression was most accurate when ground and spectral variables were very closely related (r between the data exceeding .89). Cokriging was more accurate in all other situations. Conditional simulation, though not as accurate, was superior to the other two methods in reproducing the univariate and spatial characteristics of vegetation amount. The sample size was 300 and the sampling fraction was .3%. For a real data set from western Montana, USA, over 300 ground measurements of conifer canopy cover made in each of two years by the US Forest Service and collocated NDVI values from Landsat TM were used to predict canopy cover in a 97 square km2 subarea where the sampling fraction was .03%. The nonlinear aspatial regression model between canopy cover and NDVI had statistically identical parameters in both years, but prediction intervals were very wide and accuracy was low at test points. Cokriged maps had much higher accuracy, but were affected by the small sampling fraction and clumped of ground measurements. Conditionally simulated realizations using collocated cokriging displayed the desirable aspects of cokriging at the same time as presenting plausible global and spatial distributions of canopy cover and were therefore preferable to the cokriged maps.
University of Southampton
Dungan, Jennifer Lee
b87abd4c-df32-4633-aee4-6f66dcc51f77
1999
Dungan, Jennifer Lee
b87abd4c-df32-4633-aee4-6f66dcc51f77
Dungan, Jennifer Lee
(1999)
Geostatistical prediction of vegetation amount using ground and remotely sensed data.
University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.
Record type:
Thesis
(Doctoral)
Abstract
Geostatistical methods, which assume spatial dependence, have an untapped potential to map vegetation amount using ancillary data from remote sensing images. Two geostatistical methods, cokriging and conditional simulation, were constructed with aspatial regression in terms of their accuracy and uncertainty description.
For a synthetic data set constructed from imaging spectrometer data, spatial regression was most accurate when ground and spectral variables were very closely related (r between the data exceeding .89). Cokriging was more accurate in all other situations. Conditional simulation, though not as accurate, was superior to the other two methods in reproducing the univariate and spatial characteristics of vegetation amount. The sample size was 300 and the sampling fraction was .3%. For a real data set from western Montana, USA, over 300 ground measurements of conifer canopy cover made in each of two years by the US Forest Service and collocated NDVI values from Landsat TM were used to predict canopy cover in a 97 square km2 subarea where the sampling fraction was .03%. The nonlinear aspatial regression model between canopy cover and NDVI had statistically identical parameters in both years, but prediction intervals were very wide and accuracy was low at test points. Cokriged maps had much higher accuracy, but were affected by the small sampling fraction and clumped of ground measurements. Conditionally simulated realizations using collocated cokriging displayed the desirable aspects of cokriging at the same time as presenting plausible global and spatial distributions of canopy cover and were therefore preferable to the cokriged maps.
Text
731350.pdf
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: 1999
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 464084
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/464084
PURE UUID: b84e8c80-3d2f-4d1d-bbe6-d96ab44e33fb
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 04 Jul 2022 21:02
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 19:07
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Jennifer Lee Dungan
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics