The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Geostatistical prediction of vegetation amount using ground and remotely sensed data

Geostatistical prediction of vegetation amount using ground and remotely sensed data
Geostatistical prediction of vegetation amount using ground and remotely sensed data

Geostatistical methods, which assume spatial dependence, have an untapped potential to map vegetation amount using ancillary data from remote sensing images. Two geostatistical methods, cokriging and conditional simulation, were constructed with aspatial regression in terms of their accuracy and uncertainty description.

For a synthetic data set constructed from imaging spectrometer data, spatial regression was most accurate when ground and spectral variables were very closely related (r between the data exceeding .89). Cokriging was more accurate in all other situations. Conditional simulation, though not as accurate, was superior to the other two methods in reproducing the univariate and spatial characteristics of vegetation amount. The sample size was 300 and the sampling fraction was .3%. For a real data set from western Montana, USA, over 300 ground measurements of conifer canopy cover made in each of two years by the US Forest Service and collocated NDVI values from Landsat TM were used to predict canopy cover in a 97 square km2 subarea where the sampling fraction was .03%. The nonlinear aspatial regression model between canopy cover and NDVI had statistically identical parameters in both years, but prediction intervals were very wide and accuracy was low at test points. Cokriged maps had much higher accuracy, but were affected by the small sampling fraction and clumped of ground measurements. Conditionally simulated realizations using collocated cokriging displayed the desirable aspects of cokriging at the same time as presenting plausible global and spatial distributions of canopy cover and were therefore preferable to the cokriged maps.

University of Southampton
Dungan, Jennifer Lee
b87abd4c-df32-4633-aee4-6f66dcc51f77
Dungan, Jennifer Lee
b87abd4c-df32-4633-aee4-6f66dcc51f77

Dungan, Jennifer Lee (1999) Geostatistical prediction of vegetation amount using ground and remotely sensed data. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Geostatistical methods, which assume spatial dependence, have an untapped potential to map vegetation amount using ancillary data from remote sensing images. Two geostatistical methods, cokriging and conditional simulation, were constructed with aspatial regression in terms of their accuracy and uncertainty description.

For a synthetic data set constructed from imaging spectrometer data, spatial regression was most accurate when ground and spectral variables were very closely related (r between the data exceeding .89). Cokriging was more accurate in all other situations. Conditional simulation, though not as accurate, was superior to the other two methods in reproducing the univariate and spatial characteristics of vegetation amount. The sample size was 300 and the sampling fraction was .3%. For a real data set from western Montana, USA, over 300 ground measurements of conifer canopy cover made in each of two years by the US Forest Service and collocated NDVI values from Landsat TM were used to predict canopy cover in a 97 square km2 subarea where the sampling fraction was .03%. The nonlinear aspatial regression model between canopy cover and NDVI had statistically identical parameters in both years, but prediction intervals were very wide and accuracy was low at test points. Cokriged maps had much higher accuracy, but were affected by the small sampling fraction and clumped of ground measurements. Conditionally simulated realizations using collocated cokriging displayed the desirable aspects of cokriging at the same time as presenting plausible global and spatial distributions of canopy cover and were therefore preferable to the cokriged maps.

Text
731350.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (20MB)

More information

Published date: 1999

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 464084
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/464084
PURE UUID: b84e8c80-3d2f-4d1d-bbe6-d96ab44e33fb

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Jul 2022 21:02
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 19:07

Export record

Contributors

Author: Jennifer Lee Dungan

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×