The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Poetry and posies : the poetics of the family magazine 1840-1860

Poetry and posies : the poetics of the family magazine 1840-1860
Poetry and posies : the poetics of the family magazine 1840-1860

This thesis examines how the poetry published by family magazines of the early Victorian period demonstrates both the conservative influence of contemporary poetics upon popular verse and the extent of resistance to such influence.

It argues that academic and domestic discourses of the first quarter of the nineteenth century exclude the social and political from their definitions of 'true poetry' and that this process of exclusion is evident in the poetics of magazines intended for a family readership. It also contends that the similarities between poems appearing in these magazines and overtly political poetry indicates both how political poetry is constrained by contemporary poetics and how apparently conventional poems may resist such constraint through limited social and political reference.

The first chapter discusses the frequent use of floral imagery in the poetry published in family magazines and locates such imagery in the context of domestic ideology and in relation to other forms of contemporary floral representation. It suggests how otherwise conventional poems may draw attention to the constraints of poetic convention obliquely, representing poetic conformity as incoherent.

Subsequent chapters explore the extent to which contemporary poetics modifies Romantic conceptions of the poet's role by excluding the expression of social or political ideas from its definitions of poetry. Firstly, academic writing is examined through the work of John Stuart Mill and John Keble. Here it is argued that despite their distinct Utilitarian and Christian philosophies their writings on poetry each establish a view of poetry as a closely regulated discourse that distances the poet from society and therefore precludes the possibility of a legitimate popular poetry. Secondly, Mary Ann Stodart is considered as an example of a writer on domestic matters. It is argued here that she identifies poetry as a particularly powerful and subversive genre antithetical to the maintenance of social stability. Thirdly, articles on poets and poetry taken from a selection of family magazines of the period are examined in order to demonstrate the extent to which the ideas discussed by Mill, Keble and Stodart are represented in the poetic of these periodicals.

University of Southampton
Rossiter, Ian
646b194e-f5b2-467a-abc0-3ba57f28ad8f
Rossiter, Ian
646b194e-f5b2-467a-abc0-3ba57f28ad8f

Rossiter, Ian (2000) Poetry and posies : the poetics of the family magazine 1840-1860. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

This thesis examines how the poetry published by family magazines of the early Victorian period demonstrates both the conservative influence of contemporary poetics upon popular verse and the extent of resistance to such influence.

It argues that academic and domestic discourses of the first quarter of the nineteenth century exclude the social and political from their definitions of 'true poetry' and that this process of exclusion is evident in the poetics of magazines intended for a family readership. It also contends that the similarities between poems appearing in these magazines and overtly political poetry indicates both how political poetry is constrained by contemporary poetics and how apparently conventional poems may resist such constraint through limited social and political reference.

The first chapter discusses the frequent use of floral imagery in the poetry published in family magazines and locates such imagery in the context of domestic ideology and in relation to other forms of contemporary floral representation. It suggests how otherwise conventional poems may draw attention to the constraints of poetic convention obliquely, representing poetic conformity as incoherent.

Subsequent chapters explore the extent to which contemporary poetics modifies Romantic conceptions of the poet's role by excluding the expression of social or political ideas from its definitions of poetry. Firstly, academic writing is examined through the work of John Stuart Mill and John Keble. Here it is argued that despite their distinct Utilitarian and Christian philosophies their writings on poetry each establish a view of poetry as a closely regulated discourse that distances the poet from society and therefore precludes the possibility of a legitimate popular poetry. Secondly, Mary Ann Stodart is considered as an example of a writer on domestic matters. It is argued here that she identifies poetry as a particularly powerful and subversive genre antithetical to the maintenance of social stability. Thirdly, articles on poets and poetry taken from a selection of family magazines of the period are examined in order to demonstrate the extent to which the ideas discussed by Mill, Keble and Stodart are represented in the poetic of these periodicals.

Text
771180.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (6MB)

More information

Published date: 2000

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 464271
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/464271
PURE UUID: f74f476a-c2eb-45d9-b4b2-129c48a9a233

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Jul 2022 21:51
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 19:22

Export record

Contributors

Author: Ian Rossiter

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×