The contribution of meaning in forming holistic and segmented based visual representations
The contribution of meaning in forming holistic and segmented based visual representations
Three paradigms were used to compare performance across meaningful and meaningless stimuli. Within each type of stimulus the relative performances with simple and complex objects were examined. The complexity was used as an analytical tool. In a segment-based representation, with relatively independent parts, there would be more parts in the representation of a complex stimulus that in that of a simple stimulus. In holistic representations the parts would be less independent; the number of parts would be less influential that the relationship among them.
The first study used a mental rotation task. A segmented representation would show an interactive effect of orientation and complexity, whereas a holistic representation would not. The findings suggested that the meaningful stimuli were rotated part by part, whereas the meaningless objects were rotated holistically. The second study used a part search task. It was predicted that the dependence among the parts in a holistic representation would result in a greater difference in performance across complexities than in a segmented representation with independent parts. The complexity of the stimulus showed a greater difference in the meaningful stimuli than in the meaningless stimuli. Assuming that holistic representations made more use of configural information than segment-based representations, the final study tested the contribution of configural information to the representation during a binary forced-choice probe task. The meaningful stimuli showed a greater advantage when configural information was present, especially the complex stimuli, relative to the meaningless stimuli.
The findings suggested that meaningful objects were represented more holistically than comparable meaningless objects; this difference is greater in the complex stimuli.
University of Southampton
Smith, Wendy
b3cb3089-2fd6-4a88-a354-40afdb37a6b0
2000
Smith, Wendy
b3cb3089-2fd6-4a88-a354-40afdb37a6b0
Smith, Wendy
(2000)
The contribution of meaning in forming holistic and segmented based visual representations.
University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.
Record type:
Thesis
(Doctoral)
Abstract
Three paradigms were used to compare performance across meaningful and meaningless stimuli. Within each type of stimulus the relative performances with simple and complex objects were examined. The complexity was used as an analytical tool. In a segment-based representation, with relatively independent parts, there would be more parts in the representation of a complex stimulus that in that of a simple stimulus. In holistic representations the parts would be less independent; the number of parts would be less influential that the relationship among them.
The first study used a mental rotation task. A segmented representation would show an interactive effect of orientation and complexity, whereas a holistic representation would not. The findings suggested that the meaningful stimuli were rotated part by part, whereas the meaningless objects were rotated holistically. The second study used a part search task. It was predicted that the dependence among the parts in a holistic representation would result in a greater difference in performance across complexities than in a segmented representation with independent parts. The complexity of the stimulus showed a greater difference in the meaningful stimuli than in the meaningless stimuli. Assuming that holistic representations made more use of configural information than segment-based representations, the final study tested the contribution of configural information to the representation during a binary forced-choice probe task. The meaningful stimuli showed a greater advantage when configural information was present, especially the complex stimuli, relative to the meaningless stimuli.
The findings suggested that meaningful objects were represented more holistically than comparable meaningless objects; this difference is greater in the complex stimuli.
Text
771376.pdf
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: 2000
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 464272
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/464272
PURE UUID: 5aee81fc-9736-40c8-a3af-83563ce655bd
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 04 Jul 2022 21:52
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 19:22
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Wendy Smith
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics