Arts for everyone? The distribution of arts lottery funds by region and genre 1995-98
Arts for everyone? The distribution of arts lottery funds by region and genre 1995-98
In November 1994, a new form of arts patronage began with the introduction of the British National Lottery. The subsequent distribution of arts lottery funds excited much comment over the regional equity and artistic propriety of the allocations. In this thesis, I address these issues by examining the application processes and the lottery award statistics of the four arts councils responsible for distributing the funds. After establishing conclusions on the equity of distribution, I examine the tools employed by journalists to sway opinion, and compare their representation of distribution with that discovered in the statistical analysis. I then examine the five pilot schemes, introduced by the Arts Council of England in 1996, to reveal how the schemes addressed the public criticism cited by the press. Through this thesis I plot the changing approach of the arts councils to public access to lottery benefits and draw conclusions on their success in achieving equity. Finally, I discuss the changes in arts distribution that limit this study to the three year period April 1995 to March 1998, and suggest some future directions for research.
University of Southampton
Webb, Elizabeth Ruth
70a285d2-9495-43f8-baf2-18c13be90098
2000
Webb, Elizabeth Ruth
70a285d2-9495-43f8-baf2-18c13be90098
Webb, Elizabeth Ruth
(2000)
Arts for everyone? The distribution of arts lottery funds by region and genre 1995-98.
University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.
Record type:
Thesis
(Doctoral)
Abstract
In November 1994, a new form of arts patronage began with the introduction of the British National Lottery. The subsequent distribution of arts lottery funds excited much comment over the regional equity and artistic propriety of the allocations. In this thesis, I address these issues by examining the application processes and the lottery award statistics of the four arts councils responsible for distributing the funds. After establishing conclusions on the equity of distribution, I examine the tools employed by journalists to sway opinion, and compare their representation of distribution with that discovered in the statistical analysis. I then examine the five pilot schemes, introduced by the Arts Council of England in 1996, to reveal how the schemes addressed the public criticism cited by the press. Through this thesis I plot the changing approach of the arts councils to public access to lottery benefits and draw conclusions on their success in achieving equity. Finally, I discuss the changes in arts distribution that limit this study to the three year period April 1995 to March 1998, and suggest some future directions for research.
Text
771478.pdf
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: 2000
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 464277
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/464277
PURE UUID: 55cf5bcb-25c9-4381-8727-4fe526d646fb
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 04 Jul 2022 21:53
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 19:23
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Elizabeth Ruth Webb
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics