Factors affecting human self-control in a local versus global choice paradigm
Factors affecting human self-control in a local versus global choice paradigm
Recently, Rachlin (1995a) has criticised the traditional smaller-sooner vs. larger-later model of self-control on the grounds that it fails to capture many of the essential characteristics of the situations to which the everyday language sense of self-control is usually applied. Rachlin's alternative model sees self-control as choosing to act in ways that deliver relatively small immediate (local) rewards but that contribute to a larger overall (global) pattern of reward. The choice procedure of Herrnstein, Loewenstein, Prelec, and Vaughan (1993) offers a laboratory-based instantiation of these conditions. This thesis is concerned with the examination of factors that may affect human choice between local and global rewards.
The thesis reports four experiments that used the Herrnstein et al. (1993) paradigm to examine how cognitive and motivational factors may affect human choice. Overall, participants were found to be relatively insensitive to the global contingency. In Experiment 1, rewards were based on accumulating points. Participants preferred local reward when the difference in local rates was larger, but the provision of prospective and social comparative information reduced local choice. In Experiments 2 to 4, rewards were based on minimising delay. Experiment 2 manipulated the difference in local rates but the results were inconclusive. Experiment 3 found that global choice was increased by the provision of explicit delay information but that the rate at which the rewards changed between trials had no effect within the parameters studied. Experiment 4 found that the provision of a written description of the contingencies increased global choice relative to a control group but that a forced-choice training procedure did not. Generally, global strategies increased with awareness of the global contingency. Results are discussed in relation to Skinner's (1969) distinction between contingency-shaped and rule-governed behaviour.
University of Southampton
Warry, Christopher John Bevan
9d62963c-d04e-4dfe-bd02-c9baddba8b70
2000
Warry, Christopher John Bevan
9d62963c-d04e-4dfe-bd02-c9baddba8b70
Warry, Christopher John Bevan
(2000)
Factors affecting human self-control in a local versus global choice paradigm.
University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.
Record type:
Thesis
(Doctoral)
Abstract
Recently, Rachlin (1995a) has criticised the traditional smaller-sooner vs. larger-later model of self-control on the grounds that it fails to capture many of the essential characteristics of the situations to which the everyday language sense of self-control is usually applied. Rachlin's alternative model sees self-control as choosing to act in ways that deliver relatively small immediate (local) rewards but that contribute to a larger overall (global) pattern of reward. The choice procedure of Herrnstein, Loewenstein, Prelec, and Vaughan (1993) offers a laboratory-based instantiation of these conditions. This thesis is concerned with the examination of factors that may affect human choice between local and global rewards.
The thesis reports four experiments that used the Herrnstein et al. (1993) paradigm to examine how cognitive and motivational factors may affect human choice. Overall, participants were found to be relatively insensitive to the global contingency. In Experiment 1, rewards were based on accumulating points. Participants preferred local reward when the difference in local rates was larger, but the provision of prospective and social comparative information reduced local choice. In Experiments 2 to 4, rewards were based on minimising delay. Experiment 2 manipulated the difference in local rates but the results were inconclusive. Experiment 3 found that global choice was increased by the provision of explicit delay information but that the rate at which the rewards changed between trials had no effect within the parameters studied. Experiment 4 found that the provision of a written description of the contingencies increased global choice relative to a control group but that a forced-choice training procedure did not. Generally, global strategies increased with awareness of the global contingency. Results are discussed in relation to Skinner's (1969) distinction between contingency-shaped and rule-governed behaviour.
Text
771482.pdf
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: 2000
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 464279
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/464279
PURE UUID: c25d7440-95b6-412f-8179-c7376742cab3
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 04 Jul 2022 21:54
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 19:23
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Christopher John Bevan Warry
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics