The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Factors affecting human self-control in a local versus global choice paradigm

Factors affecting human self-control in a local versus global choice paradigm
Factors affecting human self-control in a local versus global choice paradigm

Recently, Rachlin (1995a) has criticised the traditional smaller-sooner vs. larger-later model of self-control on the grounds that it fails to capture many of the essential characteristics of the situations to which the everyday language sense of self-control is usually applied. Rachlin's alternative model sees self-control as choosing to act in ways that deliver relatively small immediate (local) rewards but that contribute to a larger overall (global) pattern of reward. The choice procedure of Herrnstein, Loewenstein, Prelec, and Vaughan (1993) offers a laboratory-based instantiation of these conditions. This thesis is concerned with the examination of factors that may affect human choice between local and global rewards.

The thesis reports four experiments that used the Herrnstein et al. (1993) paradigm to examine how cognitive and motivational factors may affect human choice. Overall, participants were found to be relatively insensitive to the global contingency. In Experiment 1, rewards were based on accumulating points. Participants preferred local reward when the difference in local rates was larger, but the provision of prospective and social comparative information reduced local choice. In Experiments 2 to 4, rewards were based on minimising delay. Experiment 2 manipulated the difference in local rates but the results were inconclusive. Experiment 3 found that global choice was increased by the provision of explicit delay information but that the rate at which the rewards changed between trials had no effect within the parameters studied. Experiment 4 found that the provision of a written description of the contingencies increased global choice relative to a control group but that a forced-choice training procedure did not. Generally, global strategies increased with awareness of the global contingency. Results are discussed in relation to Skinner's (1969) distinction between contingency-shaped and rule-governed behaviour.

University of Southampton
Warry, Christopher John Bevan
9d62963c-d04e-4dfe-bd02-c9baddba8b70
Warry, Christopher John Bevan
9d62963c-d04e-4dfe-bd02-c9baddba8b70

Warry, Christopher John Bevan (2000) Factors affecting human self-control in a local versus global choice paradigm. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Recently, Rachlin (1995a) has criticised the traditional smaller-sooner vs. larger-later model of self-control on the grounds that it fails to capture many of the essential characteristics of the situations to which the everyday language sense of self-control is usually applied. Rachlin's alternative model sees self-control as choosing to act in ways that deliver relatively small immediate (local) rewards but that contribute to a larger overall (global) pattern of reward. The choice procedure of Herrnstein, Loewenstein, Prelec, and Vaughan (1993) offers a laboratory-based instantiation of these conditions. This thesis is concerned with the examination of factors that may affect human choice between local and global rewards.

The thesis reports four experiments that used the Herrnstein et al. (1993) paradigm to examine how cognitive and motivational factors may affect human choice. Overall, participants were found to be relatively insensitive to the global contingency. In Experiment 1, rewards were based on accumulating points. Participants preferred local reward when the difference in local rates was larger, but the provision of prospective and social comparative information reduced local choice. In Experiments 2 to 4, rewards were based on minimising delay. Experiment 2 manipulated the difference in local rates but the results were inconclusive. Experiment 3 found that global choice was increased by the provision of explicit delay information but that the rate at which the rewards changed between trials had no effect within the parameters studied. Experiment 4 found that the provision of a written description of the contingencies increased global choice relative to a control group but that a forced-choice training procedure did not. Generally, global strategies increased with awareness of the global contingency. Results are discussed in relation to Skinner's (1969) distinction between contingency-shaped and rule-governed behaviour.

Text
771482.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (9MB)

More information

Published date: 2000

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 464279
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/464279
PURE UUID: c25d7440-95b6-412f-8179-c7376742cab3

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Jul 2022 21:54
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 19:23

Export record

Contributors

Author: Christopher John Bevan Warry

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×