The historical development of 'culture' in IR : word and concepts
The historical development of 'culture' in IR : word and concepts
'Culture' is often considered to have been a neglected subject in the discipline of International Relations (IR). This thesis, however, tells a very different disciplinary story; one that reveals the idea of culture to be deeply embedded in the discipline's history. From the League of Nations era, through the Cold War, to the post-Cold War period, the word 'culture' is easily located in the work the discipline's scholars have produced. A contextual methodology is employed to recover the conceptual meaning that a number of authors have attached to the word 'culture' in their work. These authors include Norman Angell, Alfred Zimmern, Hans Morgenthau, Martin Wight, Hedley Bull and Samuel Huntington. What is clear is that these scholars have not understood the term 'culture' in the same way. In short, they have operated with alternative culture concepts; to demonstrate this point a number of distinctions are drawn.
Two concepts of culture are identified; the Arnoldian and Boasian concepts, following the humanism of Matthew Arnold and the scientific and anthropological approach of Franz Boas, respectively. It is noted that IR scholars have been uniquely placed to choose between two levels of application for their idea of culture - the international and the parochial. Depending on the type of concept a scholar has employed and the level at which that concept has been thought appropriately articulated, has served to generate a rich and varied place for the word 'culture' in IR. Within this framework, an epistemic transformation is plainly discernible in the discipline. The texts reveal a theoretical shift from the Arnoldian concept to the Boasian and from the international to the parochial level of analysis. A further distinction is drawn within the Boasian idea of culture between the essentialist and anti-essentialist configurations of the concept; this indicates that, currently, an essentialist version of the anthropological concept obscures other forms of cultural thinking.
University of Southampton
Reeves, Julie Dawn
2e904787-7043-4d67-8df1-8b4a5d49d81b
2001
Reeves, Julie Dawn
2e904787-7043-4d67-8df1-8b4a5d49d81b
Reeves, Julie Dawn
(2001)
The historical development of 'culture' in IR : word and concepts.
University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.
Record type:
Thesis
(Doctoral)
Abstract
'Culture' is often considered to have been a neglected subject in the discipline of International Relations (IR). This thesis, however, tells a very different disciplinary story; one that reveals the idea of culture to be deeply embedded in the discipline's history. From the League of Nations era, through the Cold War, to the post-Cold War period, the word 'culture' is easily located in the work the discipline's scholars have produced. A contextual methodology is employed to recover the conceptual meaning that a number of authors have attached to the word 'culture' in their work. These authors include Norman Angell, Alfred Zimmern, Hans Morgenthau, Martin Wight, Hedley Bull and Samuel Huntington. What is clear is that these scholars have not understood the term 'culture' in the same way. In short, they have operated with alternative culture concepts; to demonstrate this point a number of distinctions are drawn.
Two concepts of culture are identified; the Arnoldian and Boasian concepts, following the humanism of Matthew Arnold and the scientific and anthropological approach of Franz Boas, respectively. It is noted that IR scholars have been uniquely placed to choose between two levels of application for their idea of culture - the international and the parochial. Depending on the type of concept a scholar has employed and the level at which that concept has been thought appropriately articulated, has served to generate a rich and varied place for the word 'culture' in IR. Within this framework, an epistemic transformation is plainly discernible in the discipline. The texts reveal a theoretical shift from the Arnoldian concept to the Boasian and from the international to the parochial level of analysis. A further distinction is drawn within the Boasian idea of culture between the essentialist and anti-essentialist configurations of the concept; this indicates that, currently, an essentialist version of the anthropological concept obscures other forms of cultural thinking.
Text
784313.pdf
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: 2001
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 464356
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/464356
PURE UUID: 501f989d-6fe1-4097-a149-1e6bf43aae50
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 04 Jul 2022 22:20
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 19:26
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Julie Dawn Reeves
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics